Jump to content

90mm Recommendation (pair with 50mm Summicron V3 / 35mm Summicron V4)


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

IUFOO & 12575 hoods

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

12575 hood on Elmarit 90/2.8 v1 & Macro-Elmar 90/4 v1

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thin T-E 90/2.8 & Rokkor 90/4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lct said:

Thin T-E 90/2.8 & Rokkor 90/4

Thanks ! Do you find that the thin T-E and Rokkor render similarly (in particular, have similar colour ? ) There are significantly less sample images out there for the Rokkor but there is some feedback to suggest that they do.  If so the Rokkor is becoming increasingly tempting despite the fact I do agree with many here that T-E is the best choice. 
 

considering I own the CLE (and 2 of it’s 3 lenses) the Rokkor would be a nice (aswell as cheap) purchase to complete my set and scratch my 90mm itch. 
 

However I won’t do it if the rendering isn’t very similar to the T-E. as I’ve really enjoyed seeing the T-E images, the rendering looks perfect for what I want.  
 

Side note being that I probably don’t need the extra stop, so increased flare resistance of the Rokkor would be a very fair trade for me to make for a stop of light.

Although if you own then both perhaps they aren’t that similar in rendering ?  

Edited by grahamc
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, luigi bertolotti said:

I am on a wild side when speaking of CAPS 😒 : have lost one more 5 days ago (Summilux 50) and is the 3rd in last 12 months... 😞 

You can buy cheap red ones on eBay and use those when out and about and keep the originals at home!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, my 2 M mount 90mm lenses LEITZ Tele-Elmarit-M and Leica Elmarit-M, with fitted hood, and extended hood :

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

The LEITZ I bought with my M6 in 1988, the Elmarit-M later, used. The Elmarit-M is a little contrastier, and less fiddly to use with the extended hood.

(I would recommend the Elmarit-M as a first second-hand 90mm ... . I use them on my M9s.)

 

 

 

Edited by crony
Camera used, added
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Crony good choice.

Years ago, I had opportunity to buy (at good price sh) 90mm Elmarit-M (#11807), but declined as I found a bit heavy at 410g,

comparing to 225g of T-E or older original Elmarit's 320g that I already owned.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ianman said:

 Mine is 12575N with a chrome base. I have no idea what the “N” is for!?

Is simply the "trailing letter" that Leitz conceived and used as part of their new coding system (after the famous "five letters codes" ), and then abandoned some years after.  No other meaning : IUFOO changed to 12575N, ITOOY to 12580Q etc...

 

Edited by luigi bertolotti
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for all the input 

So where I am at is I'm leaning toward the T-E, unless anybody substantiates the rumour that the Rokkor F/2 (2nd edition) renders extremely similarly (especially in colour)...  in which case I'll take a chance on the Rokkor - trading a stop of light for better flare resistance.  As a CLE owner and shooter that doesn't really need F2.8, that outcome will suit me well .  
Although if they don't render extremely closely then the T-E it is and will take my chances with flare - since I really like the samples I've seen from T-E, the rendering style would suit me perfectly it seems. 

Cheers 

Edited by grahamc
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/18/2021 at 12:29 AM, crony said:

Hi, my 2 M mount 90mm lenses LEITZ Tele-Elmarit-M and Leica Elmarit-M, with fitted hood, and extended hood :

 

 

The LEITZ I bought with my M6 in 1988, the Elmarit-M later, used. The Elmarit-M is a little contrastier, and less fiddly to use with the extended hood.

(I would recommend the Elmarit-M as a first second-hand 90mm ... . I use them on my M9s.)

 

 

 

Thanks Crony ,  how do you find the characteristics of the Elmarit-M to compare to T-E other than contrast ?   Elmarit-M has been mentioned a few times as being a good option since it's also not too big and heavy.  Although based on the production years I have a pre-conceived idea that it will give a more modern look than my set (35mm v4 Cron, 50mm v3 Cron), however that could all be in my head.  Would welcome any more thoughts on how it compares to the T-E (which I am leaning to since it fits very well the era I'm currently owning lenses from). Cheers ! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, grahamc said:

@lct Did you happen to see my reply here - It somehow got embedded in the photo you sent, since I'm a newbie I don't think I put the text in the right location when I quoted your photo. Cheers! 

I see no reply sorry. What did you say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, lct said:

I see no reply sorry. What did you say?

Ah yes, sorry I think I messed that up in quoting.  I had said thanks for sending the side-by-side photo (of Rokkor and T-E) and asked that since you own both, if you can possibly advise how closely do they render please.  Or I should say, how closely does the Rokkor render to the T-E... Because I've now seen wealth of pics out there now from the T-E and really like it's character.  Great match for my existing lenses as many here have advised.  

However the extra stop is not essential for me, so if the v2 Rokkor does really get close (in particular with colour rendition) I may trade the extra stop for better flare control. 

There are way less sample pics out there for the Rokkor but some say that these 2 lenses render very closely 

Thanks @lct

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, a.noctilux said:

@grahamc what is the M you use ?

Maybe you had written in a post ...

I didn't see if your M in use is film or digital.

Hi @a.noctilux.  I'm using an MD-262 and for film I use the CLE.   Mostly (due to frameline convenience) my 35mm and 50mm's I use on the MD , and 28m/40mm Rokkor's on the CLE.  The 90 FL is the only one that will be a sharer since both systems have 90mm lines 

Edited by grahamc
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, grahamc said:

Ah yes, sorry I think I messed that up in quoting.  I had said thanks for sending the side-by-side photo (of Rokkor and T-E) and asked that since you own both, if you can possibly advise how closely do they render please.  Or I should say, how closely does the Rokkor render to the T-E... Because I've now seen wealth of pics out there now from the T-E and really like it's character.  Great match for my existing lenses as many here have advised.  

However the extra stop is not essential for me, so if the v2 Rokkor does really get close (in particular with colour rendition) I may trade the extra stop for better flare control. 

There are way less sample pics out there for the Rokkor but some say that these 2 lenses render very closely 

Thanks @lct

Well it is a matter of tastes and i'm not sure mine are the same as yours since i find that 50/2 v4 and v5 match pretty well the 35/2 v4. This said, i would compare the Rokkor 90/4 v2 to the T-E 90/2.8 somewhat the same way as the Rokkor 40/2 v2 vs the Leica 40/2. Both Leica and Minolta lenses have the same Mandler character sort of with less flare on the Minolta. The difference flare wise is more obvious on the Rokkor 90 which is one of my favorite 90's from this viewpoint. Now if you don't shoot often into the light, i would prefer the T-E for its small size at f/2.8. As for the Elmarit 90/2.8 v2 it is an excellent lens with less flare than the T-E and i don't see any mismatch with the 35/2 v4 which was being sold at the same time for many years. The only issue with 90/2.8 v2 is size and weight as explained by our colleagues above. FWIW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, lct said:

Well it is a matter of tastes and i'm not sure mine are the same as yours since i find that 50/2 v4 and v5 match pretty well the 35/2 v4. This said, i would compare the Rokkor 90/4 v2 to the T-E 90/2.8 somewhat the same way as the Rokkor 40/2 v2 vs the Leica 40/2. Both Leica and Minolta lenses have the same Mandler character sort of with less flare on the Minolta. The difference flare wise is more obvious on the Rokkor 90 which is one of my favorite 90's from this viewpoint. Now if you don't shoot often into the light, i would prefer the T-E for its small size at f/2.8. As for the Elmarit 90/2.8 v2 it is an excellent lens with less flare than the T-E and i don't see any mismatch with the 35/2 v4 which was being sold at the same time for many years. The only issue with 90/2.8 v2 is size and weight as explained by our colleagues above. FWIW.

OK great, thanks for that .  Sounds like I won't be able to go wrong between T-E and Rokkor for my uses.  I do shoot into the light often so may go for the Rokkor.  Good to know that feedback on the 90/2.8 v2 also thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Graham,

this would be my choice (if using with CLE plus M-D), but yours may differ :

1 - Tele-Elmarit 'thin' firstly for size/weight and as I know that a good long hood can help, a must have 12575 carried reversed

2 - Old Elmarit for sake of "right period thing" and it's a bit long but not as heavy to carry/use as the newer Elmarit-M

3 - why not the older Elmar in LTM (as I stated before plus adapter M) cheap very light but as good (or even better than T-E in some use )

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, a.noctilux said:

I know that a good long hood can help, a must have 12575 carried reversed

It does not on both Canada and German made T-E 90/2.8 in my experience but the 12575 hood may help to cup the hand around the lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...