Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For any incremental improvement in performance, you would pay a steep premium. When I don't need the speed, I choose my late version Summicron rather than carry the extra weight of my Summilux. It all depends on your regular needs.

Edited by wda
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the center it's comparable, over the whole field the APO dominates at f/2.

Btw., the APO is not much lighter than the Summilux. I went back to the Summilux as I prefer the rendering and the extra stop over edge-to-edge sharpness. As additional benefit, the 35 FLE could join the gang due to additional funds 😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jaeger said:

as good as 50mm APO

You are comparing two excellent lenses that deliver everything a reasonable person could want. I moved from 'lux to APO as I wanted 'the best', and it is not just about sharpness, also colour, clarity and performance in all areas. To quote from another APO thread - it just delivers and never gets in the way.

That said, I have never been unhappy with my Zeiss 50mm Planar or Elmar-M!

Edited by pedaes
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The "bokeh balls" from a Summicron at f/2 will of course always be rounder than a Summilux at f/2, because the Summicron's aperture blades are wide open, while the Summilux is slightly stopped down. At f/2.8 a Summicron will still retain an advantage in this regard, because one stop down shapes a rounder aperture than two stops. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

10 blades vs 9 blades too.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A more interesting (fair) comparison would be the Summilux ASPH at f/2.8 against the APO Summicron at f/4.0 (both stopped down 2 stops). That would show the effect of the number of aperture blades.

Edited by evikne
Link to post
Share on other sites

For a lens of this value I shouldn't have to worry that shooting at certain apertures might give these results.  I haven't experienced the same with the APO-Summicron.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, easy_action said:

For a lens of this value I shouldn't have to worry that shooting at certain apertures might give these results.

Any lens, regardless of price, will do the same.  Shoot towards dappled light, adjust the aperture to f/4 or f/5.6,and focus on an object that's at the minimum focus limit and the out of focus specular highlights will look like circular saw blades instead of balloons.

... Unless you meant only having the top of the subject's head in the bottom right corner, which would qualify as 'operator error'.

Pete.

Edited by farnz
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, easy_action said:

For a lens of this value I shouldn't have to worry that shooting at certain apertures might give these results.  I haven't experienced the same with the APO-Summicron.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Typical OoF rendering of the Summilux 50/1.4 asph. You would get rounder bokeh balls with a 50/1.4 pre-asph or a 50/2 apo if you prefer that. Matter of tastes but i don't think the price has anything to do with that. I prefer the 6 diaphragm blades of the cheaper Elmar-M 50/2.8 personally, don't ask me why...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The combination saw blade + bull's eye bokeh is difficult to 'unsee' once you have noticed it.

I lost faith in the lens a bit after that, which was frustrating as otherwise there is a lot to like.

Happily there are plenty of alternatives available.

 

1 hour ago, farnz said:

Unless you meant only having the top of the subject's head in the bottom right corner, which would qualify as 'operator error'.

If only you knew how often i manage to crop peoples feet - always the feet....

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, easy_action said:

For a lens of this value I shouldn't have to worry that shooting at certain apertures might give these results.  I haven't experienced the same with the APO-Summicron.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I like the painterly look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...