signalkuppe Posted May 22, 2020 Share #1 Posted May 22, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) I noticed that removing the automatic geometry correction of DxO the field of view widens a lot The automatic correction in jpegs forces a 3:2 aspect ratio, while the raw one seems like a 16:10 I think that this is normal but the uncorrected raw seems nearly perfect without any critical distorsion or vignetting It's like having a wider lens Here is an example without Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! with Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! with ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/309834-q2-and-dng-geometry-crop/?do=findComment&comment=3978348'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 22, 2020 Posted May 22, 2020 Hi signalkuppe, Take a look here Q2 and DNG geometry crop. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Leica28 Posted May 22, 2020 Share #2 Posted May 22, 2020 Interesting!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iliyan Michev Posted March 30, 2022 Share #3 Posted March 30, 2022 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/309834-q2-and-dng-geometry-crop/?do=findComment&comment=4409728'>More sharing options...
Siriusone59 Posted March 30, 2022 Share #4 Posted March 30, 2022 Thanks for posting those results. I think most of us knew that lens correction would crop a bit to eliminate the vignetting, but doubted that it would be quite that much. I wonder(just thinking out loud) if aperture would have any effect on the amount of vignetting or how much the correction would remove. From the original post I'm guessing that smaller aperture would create less but the correction will remove the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave in Wales Posted April 4, 2022 Share #5 Posted April 4, 2022 (edited) DNG file.......Screen shot of Luminar 4 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! DNG file...........Screen shot of Photoshop Elements 2022 Edited April 4, 2022 by Dave in Wales Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! DNG file...........Screen shot of Photoshop Elements 2022 ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/309834-q2-and-dng-geometry-crop/?do=findComment&comment=4412277'>More sharing options...
TeleElmar135mm Posted April 4, 2022 Share #6 Posted April 4, 2022 (edited) In the german forum we had a similar discussion about the 24-90 - just the same Edited April 4, 2022 by TeleElmar135mm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmschuh Posted April 6, 2022 Share #7 Posted April 6, 2022 Advertisement (gone after registration) Even with the Q1, initial comparisons showed that the lens tends to show the angle of view of a 26mm lens. Since no one wants to have a 26mm lens, they write 28mm on it. That is not uncommon. The focal length sold is often a bit of marketing and variations have always been normal. Hardly any of the 50mm lenses sold for years really had 50mm. In the very early days, the variance was also engraved on the lenses. At some point they stopped doing that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now