bags27 Posted November 28, 2019 Share #21  Posted November 28, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) 20 minutes ago, nicci78 said: So what do you prefer ? CL + S Pro 70-200 f/4 + 2x TC ? or CL + Vario-Elmar-R 80-200 f/4 + APO-Extender 2x ? Does this rig usable handhold ? Or do we need a monopod for stable focusing ? I use the latter, and it is handholdable, especially in decent sunlight (I shoot at 1/1000 and no higher than ISO 1600; I try to shoot at f/8 to give a bit of depth to the bird). But the best support for that is the incomparable Leica table tripod that acts as a chest tripod. Easy to find on ebay. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 28, 2019 Posted November 28, 2019 Hi bags27, Take a look here Tele for SL ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
nicci78 Posted November 28, 2019 Share #22  Posted November 28, 2019 Thank you for the answer Ken. I quite like the idea of the 80-200 f/4 But I am a bit quite concern about the shaky view between 200 and 600mm equivalent focal lengths.  I not the idea of Leica table tripod. Doesn’t it look a bit weird ? 🤔 But certainly more manageable than a monopod. Why not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bags27 Posted November 28, 2019 Share #23  Posted November 28, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, nicci78 said:  Doesn’t it look a bit weird ? 🤔 But certainly more manageable than a monopod. Why not. Weird? everyone out birding looks weird. No matter what you wear or carry, you won't look more or less weird than every other birder. 😀 As to equipment, few birders are ever satisfied for long. It's sort of like golf: a good walk spoiled. So many missed shots, but we keep at it. Edited November 28, 2019 by bags27 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erudolph Posted November 28, 2019 Share #24  Posted November 28, 2019 Hi nicci... I guess I prefer the Panasonic. It is handholdable.  Also, the CL + Vario-Elmar-R 80-200 f/4 + APO-Extender 2x requires the big R-L adapter.   1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bags27 Posted November 28, 2019 Share #25  Posted November 28, 2019 just to say that there are small and cheap r to m and the m to L adapters. A lot of folks do this, but it's an individual decision. Just wanted to put that out as information  Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 28, 2019 Share #26  Posted November 28, 2019 On 9/27/2019 at 12:48 PM, dkCambridgeshire said: A budget price option worth considering is a Novoflex 'follow focus' mount with a Noflexar 'T' 400/5.6 … with a Novoflex R adapter plus R to SL adapter … which compatible with R 1.4 x and 2x APO extenders … and is capable of excellent imaging. Furthermore, the Novoflex follow focus mount has a built-in bellows which enables close focus. Try a forum SEARCH using 'Noflexar' to see the apparatus. dunk Only the older type Noflexar doublet has the bellows. The Noflexar-T ( triplet-the better lens) has a sliding mount only. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted November 29, 2019 Share #27  Posted November 29, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) 16 hours ago, jaapv said: Only the older type Noflexar doublet has the bellows. The Noflexar-T ( triplet-the better lens) has a sliding mount only. I have two Noflexar T '3 element' lenses with bellows … Noflexar mounts are modular and can be configured with or without Novoflex bellows. dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now