Paulus Posted October 16, 2018 Share #1 Posted October 16, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) Just happened to see this in Lightroom, I don't know what it means. Another bug? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/290588-anybody-interested-in-a-90mm-summilux-m-11590-asph/?do=findComment&comment=3613779'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 Hi Paulus, Take a look here Anybody interested in a 90mm: Summilux M 1:1,5/90 ASPH. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Paulus Posted October 16, 2018 Author Share #2 Posted October 16, 2018 DNG File Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/290588-anybody-interested-in-a-90mm-summilux-m-11590-asph/?do=findComment&comment=3613784'>More sharing options...
Peter Kilmister Posted October 16, 2018 Share #3 Posted October 16, 2018 Maybe it's me that's missing something, but I can't see anything wrong. Neither can I see any error message It just looks like an autumn scene on an old pathway. Please explain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted October 16, 2018 Share #4 Posted October 16, 2018 I think that the 90mm indication is wrong as he has a 50mm. Is that it? I would clean the contacts . . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted October 16, 2018 Share #5 Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Alex U. said: I think that the 90mm indication is wrong as he has a 50mm. Is that it? I would clean the contacts . . Good idea… indeed a Summilux 1,5/90 ("twin" of the 1,25/75) is rumored by some time : see Leicarumors and also the Forum.. it's even in the official "Leica Poster" , but without a declared 6 bit code, contrary to the available lenses : probably a code has been issued… Adobe took notice and listed it in new version of LR as a recognizable lens… which lens was mounted in your picture, Paulus ? Supposing that 1 bit only was misread… we could speculate by "reverse reasoning" what's the code of the 1,5/90... Edited October 16, 2018 by luigi bertolotti Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted October 16, 2018 Share #6 Posted October 16, 2018 There is something very strange in the exif! Focal Length : 90.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 535.4 mm) There is also: Lens Info : 90mm f/1.5-16 Lens Make : Leica Camera AG Lens Model : Summilux-M 1:1.5/90 ASPH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
schattenundlicht Posted October 16, 2018 Share #7 Posted October 16, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) A 90 mm f/1.5 at a minimum focusing distance of 0.7 m, presupposing a conservative circle of confusion of 0.3 mm, would have a DOF of about one milimeter to each side of the true focus point. A very useful and much needed lens to take portraits of a single eyelash🙄. This will be difficult to achieve without EVF as viewfinder blockage will amount to total eclipse. The downside would be the two strongmen aides needed to carry around the lump of glass for you, and the bodyguard on which the insurance company will insist due to the expected retail price😂. Sadly, in real life, the rumour on this lens has been condensing since about June. But to each his own... 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted October 16, 2018 Share #8 Posted October 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, ianman said: There is something very strange in the exif! Focal Length : 90.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 535.4 mm) …. LOL … Adobe's developers make usual Software errors… a Supertele for cellphones 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted October 16, 2018 Share #9 Posted October 16, 2018 And what is this? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/290588-anybody-interested-in-a-90mm-summilux-m-11590-asph/?do=findComment&comment=3613840'>More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 16, 2018 Share #10 Posted October 16, 2018 Zeiss announced a Otus 1.4/100 after the Otus 1.4/85 came out a while ago, which is also not a small lens. The 1.0/35mm apparently coming from Zenith (isn‘t there a Switch watch brand, too? How come the lawyers let the brand names coexist?) probably obstructs more of the viewfinder‘s frames, which are bigger for a shorter focal length. So whoever must have such an object should not give up hope imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted October 16, 2018 Share #11 Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Alex U. said: And what is this? Well Paul is Dutch, so it stands to reason that he is using a Dutch version of the software ! Just take a look at the other labels in his screenshot. Edited October 16, 2018 by ianman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 16, 2018 Share #12 Posted October 16, 2018 vor 1 Stunde schrieb Paulus: Just happened to see this in Lightroom, I don't know what it means. Another bug? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! What lens did you use, Paul? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted October 16, 2018 Share #13 Posted October 16, 2018 And these are the EXIFs that I see: Unfortunately the Forum Software does not allow me to upload another Screenshot being 600K in size. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted October 16, 2018 Share #14 Posted October 16, 2018 From Google translate from Dutch… "1/250 sec bij" is "at 1/250 sec." ... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted October 16, 2018 Share #15 Posted October 16, 2018 vor 7 Minuten schrieb ianman: Well Paul is Dutch, so it stands to reason that he is using a Dutch version of the software ! Just take a look at the other labels in his screenshot. Of course that is correct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted October 16, 2018 Share #16 Posted October 16, 2018 9 minutes ago, luigi bertolotti said: LOL … Adobe's developers make usual Software errors… a Supertele for cellphones 😀 Yes, but Adobe software did not write the Quote Lens Model : Summilux-M 1:1.5/90 ASPH. ... that was clearly written in camera. So I would suggest that this lens is "known" in the firmware, and as you mentioned maybe some dirt corrupted the reading of the real lens and the camera just thought that a lens having this "new" code was attached. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianman Posted October 16, 2018 Share #17 Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Alex U. said: And these are the EXIFs that I see: Unfortunately the Forum Software does not allow me to upload another Screenshot being 600K in size. Reduce the filesize then ! 🙄 https://tinyjpg.com/ Edited October 16, 2018 by ianman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UliWer Posted October 16, 2018 Share #18 Posted October 16, 2018 Which lens did you actually use? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted October 16, 2018 Share #19 Posted October 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, ianman said: 😀 Yes, but Adobe software did not write the ... that was clearly written in camera. So I would suggest that this lens is "known" in the firmware, and as you mentioned maybe some dirt corrupted the reading of the real lens and the camera just thought that a lens having this "new" code was attached. You're perfectly right … name of the lens is in the camera firmware, no doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M11 for me Posted October 16, 2018 Share #20 Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Oh, here then my EXIFs 🙂 And here the EXIFs after being throughtinyjpg.com 🙂 Edited October 16, 2018 by Alex U. Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Oh, here then my EXIFs 🙂 And here the EXIFs after being throughtinyjpg.com 🙂 ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/290588-anybody-interested-in-a-90mm-summilux-m-11590-asph/?do=findComment&comment=3613862'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now