Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

31 minutes ago, Jeff S said:

Still ok with hood reverse mounted?

Jeff

I'm able to comfortably get the 90-280mm into the Lowepro 11x26 with the tripod foot attached & hood reversed.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if this lens fits vertically within a Billingham Hadley One?  (The Hadley Pro, which I own, is too short.) The specs for the insert indicate about 1.5 inches shy, but the Oberwerth Porto (far more expensive) has similar specs and it supposedly was designed to hold the zoom vertically.  

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jeff S said:

Does anyone know if this lens fits vertically within a Billingham Hadley One?  (The Hadley Pro, which I own, is too short.) The specs for the insert indicate about 1.5 inches shy, but the Oberwerth Porto (far more expensive) has similar specs and it supposedly was designed to hold the zoom vertically.  

Jeff

Jeff, don't know about the Billingham Hadley One, I have the ONA Brixton Messenger Bag and it takes the lens vertically without a squeeze.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I no longer *protect* gear. It just makes it difficult to access when I need it. My 90-280 goes into to the bottom of whatever bag I’m using for the day and that’s it. Often.that’s a normal backpack and a gear wrap. I have removed the tripod foot and replaced it with a simple RRS plate with QD mount. The $600,000.00 lens cap is replaced by something that costs 12c or, if I’m shooting landscapes, an 82mm Lee filter ring and cover.

I try to take care of my gear but access is the most important thing when I pack a bag.

Gordon

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed that ‘protect’ just meant something other than in hand, mounted on camera...in bag, pouch, backpack or whatever.  Unlike my other lenses, I would rarely if ever use solely the 90-280 for the whole day, hence my questions about carrying, and at least minimally protecting it, while not mounted. At least that was my perspective.  I don’t baby my gear; just seeking functional carry options.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, FlashGordonPhotography said:

I no longer *protect* gear. It just makes it difficult to access when I need it. My 90-280 goes into to the bottom of whatever bag I’m using for the day and that’s it. Often.that’s a normal backpack and a gear wrap. I have removed the tripod foot and replaced it with a simple RRS plate with QD mount. The $600,000.00 lens cap is replaced by something that costs 12c or, if I’m shooting landscapes, an 82mm Lee filter ring and cover.

I try to take care of my gear but access is the most important thing when I pack a bag.

Gordon

Aha! I used to mount RRS plate on the tripod foot of the 90-280. Removing the tripod food and mounting BQDS instead works much better, though the BQDS's anti-twist flange barely prevents accidental rotation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking personally, given the landscapes and environments that we traverse on our safaris, the gear definitely does need protection. A broken lens or camera is no good when sitting in the Namib Desert, 22 hours drive away from the closest town -with no camera shop-,  or 4 hours flight from the closest camera shop.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 8:42 AM, michali said:

I'm able to comfortably get the 90-280mm into the Lowepro 11x26 with the tripod foot attached & hood reversed.

 

I just put mine into an 11x26... fits, but tight. No hood, filter and front cap. Looks like there might be some differences in the padding over the years... my case doesn't have the mesh on top. Not sure if mine is older or younger than mine. Mine looks tighter than yours...

Edited by Donzo98
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Donzo98 said:

I just put mine into an 11x26... fits, but tight. No hood, filter and front cap. Looks like there might be some differences in the padding over the years... my case doesn't have the mesh on top. Not sure if mine is older or younger than mine. Mine looks tighter than yours...

I figured it out... the case I have is the Lowepro Lens Case 4... (4.5 x 10H in. / 11.5 x 25.5 cm) vs (4.3 x H: 10.2" / 11.0 x H: 26.0 cm)... so mine is slightly shorter.

Edited by Donzo98
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Tenba pouches if the lens travels outside a padded backpack (Thinktank). It is a wise strategy to protect a telephoto with a neoprene coat - including medium tele-zooms.  The camou likely helps for wildlife shooting but the rubber takes the brunt of scratches and general wear and is also better than zero impact buffer.

The popular US make (on Wex, BandH etc) doesn't wear at all well in my experience. Shoddy stitching. But the covers from this UK supplier are better made. They also release new models soon after a mainstream lens appears in the market. Maybe worth contacting them to enquire

https://www.outdoorphotographygear.co.uk/otheritems.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 months later...

i am one of these guys who likes to protect his telephoto-lenses during outdoor (wildlife, nature). For my Nikon gear i am using "easy-cover", possible also for the most common gear (canon, nikon...). 

When i switched to Leica, especially for the 90-280 i didn't find something similar.... 

If you are interested also in a "non 100% solution", just try "Lens coat" for Nikon 500 F/5.6 PF VR - an 80% solution for a Leica 90-280 :-))

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2019 at 9:44 AM, helged said:

And in case you want the SL2 attached to the 90-280, Think Tank Digital Holster 30 V2 provides perfect (but tight) fit...

You can do the same with the Think Tank Retrospective 7 V2. Hood is reversed.

Edited by Pixeleater
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, hellobrandonscott said:

How does Leica not include a lens bag/pouch with this lens? Seems very un-Leica.

It comes with a soft pouch (nylon?), with string tie and flat bottom. I’ve never used it.

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's not acceptable given the price point of the lens.  IMO they're cutting corners, the soft pouch is useless.

As I've mentioned earlier in this thread, I've purchased a couple of the Lowepro lens cases which offer proper protection. In addition to the case for the VE90-280L above, I've also got one for the large Canon 400mm f4 USM II, it fits the lens comfortably with the tripod foot, 1.4x TC & the Sigma MC-21 L mount adapter mounted.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I bought it I got a protective bag included to. But it is too uncomfortable to un zip and extract every time. So now I use the large oberwerth camera bag that fit my sl2, 24/90,16/35, and 90/280

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Vip said:

So now I use the large oberwerth camera bag that fit my sl2, 24/90,16/35, and 90/280

Oberwerth Porto (or the newer ‘SL2 bag’ replacement)?  I have the Porto, and it fits my SL2 plus 3 lenses, but found that it’s just too darn heavy to carry fully loaded.  If I need to carry everything, the small Billingham Rucksack 25 saves my shoulder. But if I need to carry the 90-280 as an extra lens during a hike, I’ll just place it horizontally in one of my smaller bags.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2018 at 5:59 AM, didier said:

Dear all,

I am interested to know how you protect your 90-280 : I used to have a nikon 80-400 which was sold with a lens bag and I had a LensCoat on.

None of this is part of the 90-280 box, and a LensCoat is unavailable.

Thanks for sharing your experience

 

Didier

Here’s my case for the 90-280 (& GF 250)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...