Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, scroy said:

Note with a Caveat, at CES I was only holding the mechanical prototype + 24-105 in one hand and my SL+35mm Summilux-TL in the other hand. I was told by the marketing guy that the weight should be nearly identical to the production version.

S1R + 24-105 is heavier than the SL+ 35mm Summilux-TL but the combo did feel quite a bit lighter than the SL+24-90mm. I had the 24-90mm with me as well, but couldn't compare them at the same time due to the line of people interested in holding the S1R.

 

 

Thanks for this.

One make or break consideration with the S1R, I think, will be if the sensor plays well with M lenses. If it does, despite it being very un-Leica-like in form, it may be a very tempting alternative, esp. as the current rumor (and it is only a faint one) is that the SL2 announcement is many months away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bags27 said:

Thanks for this.

One make or break consideration with the S1R, I think, will be if the sensor plays well with M lenses. If it does, despite it being very un-Leica-like in form, it may be a very tempting alternative, esp. as the current rumor (and it is only a faint one) is that the SL2 announcement is many months away.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Keith (M) said:

Looking at that video, the filter size for the 24-105mm is a huge 77mm, which really gives a clear idea of the scale of the outfit - even my Sony 70-200mm f4 G is only 72mm.

the debate about this lens (with tape hiding the aperture) is that maybe it's an f/2.8 all the way rather than a 2.8-4.0. Would the large filter help strengthen that hypothesis?

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Chaemono said:

September, but not sure if it meant announcement or availability. I assume it’s availability because the person who told me wants to buy my SL and can’t wait to do so. I’ve put my name on the “list” for the SL2. 😀

Of course, September used to be Photakino time, so maybe the person got influenced by that to give that date. (That's how we historians think, anyway--which is why we're usually wrong.)

If Leica has even a ballpark idea of what the SL2 will look like, especially its sensor, it just behooves them to make that known before Panasonic ships. Leica can't be worried about trade secrets--at its price point and quality, it effectively has no competition. But it could lose customers to GAS if there's a Panasonic in hand, and not even an SL2 in the bush.

Edited by bags27
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor einer Stunde schrieb Chaemono:

September, but not sure if it meant announcement or availability. I assume it’s availability because the person who told me wants to buy my SL and can’t wait to do so. I’ve put my name on the “list” for the SL2. 😀

On Lrumor i can only read "Leica plans to have it on market by late 2019 only". Why do you think September? Late 2019 can be 30th December…

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, bags27 said:

Of course, September used to be Photakino time, so maybe the person got influenced by that to give that date. (That's how we historians think, anyway--which is why we're usually wrong.)

If Leica has even a ballpark idea of what the SL2 will look like, especially its sensor, it just behooves them to make that known before Panasonic ships. Leica can't be worried about trade secrets--at its price point and quality, it effectively has no competition. But it could lose customers to GAS if there's a Panasonic in hand, and not even an SL2 in the bush.

Or there might be an opportunity to pick up a lightly used Panasonic end of the year ;)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, frame-it said:

i cant remember the launch price of the SL..i guess a 48MP, SL2 would probably be priced around $8000+ at launch

In UK launch price of SL601 was £5,250 later price jumped close to 6,000 only to drop below 5,000 once Sony A9 was launched.

I can see Panasonic S1R at almost identical specification to SL2 would be selling at roughly half that amount in order to keep it competitive with Nikon Z/Sony Alpha,  and also being new full frame kid on the block.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no insight, but I guess the key spec difference will be the sensor on the SL2 being the only one specifically optimised for the M lenses. I’m not sure that aspect will be worth it for me, personally, given I prefer the image quality of the SL primes over even my M 50 APO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...