Bill W Posted June 13, 2018 Share #21 Posted June 13, 2018 Advertisement (gone after registration) I have the current 28 cron and do not find it is soft. I carried it and the 50 APO with me for two weeks in Scotland last year. I also had my SL and used them both equally. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 Hi Bill W, Take a look here 2nd Lens to 50mm Apo. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
01af Posted June 13, 2018 Share #22 Posted June 13, 2018 I don't think the latest version of the Summicron-M 28 mm Asph is that much different. It is different. Not totally different ... but different enough to make the update worthwhile when 28 mm is an important focal length to you. It is based on the same optical formula as the older version. That's right. The improvements come from more rounded aperture blades and probably upgraded coatings, as well as higher precision in manufacturing to accomodate the requirements of high-resolution digital sensors. That's wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
helged Posted June 13, 2018 Share #23 Posted June 13, 2018 Regarding the 28 Elmarit, see Scott's test starting at post #32 in this thread: https://www.getdpi.com/forum/leica/57393-new-leica-lenses-announced.html. The edge sharpness is (greatly) improved in the new version, both on the M(240) and the SL. Also the new 28 Cron is improved in this respect. There could be some variations between copies, obviously, but these findings are consistent with what I see/have seen as well. The degree to which corner sharpness is an issue depends on the eyes that see and the type of shooting, but I clearly prefer the latest version(s) for landscapes and city-scapes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 13, 2018 Share #24 Posted June 13, 2018 Jono wrote that the optical formula for the new 28 Summicron (and Elmarit) WAS changed, unlike for the 35 Summicron... http://www.slack.co.uk/leica-m-resolution.html Jeff 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
indergaard Posted June 13, 2018 Share #25 Posted June 13, 2018 (edited) It is different. Not totally different ... but different enough to make the update worthwhile when 28 mm is an important focal length to you. That's right. That's wrong. That's right. That's wrong. Not much info in those statements. Please elaborate. Edited June 13, 2018 by indergaard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darylgo Posted June 14, 2018 Share #26 Posted June 14, 2018 The 24mm would be my choice. Will this be for landscape or other? The EVF is the achilles heel of the M10 and M240. Three possible solutions to eliminate it are: 1- use the camera viewfinder and realize you will have more in your image than you will see, 2- use live view on the camera monitor and 3- use an optical viewfinder, these are smaller than the EVF and more Leica-like than the bulbous plastic EVF that could snap off in harsh situations encountered with landscapes. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
low325 Posted June 15, 2018 Share #27 Posted June 15, 2018 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Sometimes I find myself wondering about this too. Though in my case, thankfully i already have an option in my Q. And its totally the mindset that I wanted to keep as I acquired the M after the Q. Though, I would vouch for the 21 as a second lens to the 50. In terms of clarity and just sheer IQ brilliance that the 50APO delivers, I would like Leica to take my money already for a 35APO. ;D. The two lenses I will take to my grave. Edited June 15, 2018 by low325 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 15, 2018 Share #28 Posted June 15, 2018 Sometimes I find myself wondering about this too. Though in my case, thankfully i already have an option in my Q. And its totally the mindset that I wanted to keep as I acquired the M after the Q. Though, I would vouch for the 21 as a second lens to the 50. In terms of clarity and just sheer IQ brilliance that the 50APO delivers, I would like Leica to take my money already for a 35APO. ;D. The two lenses I will take to my grave. APO designation for a 35 might make you feel good, but it wouldn’t mean much technically, as Andy (adan) explains... https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/281798-does-anyone-expect-a-35mm-summicron-apo-in-the-future/page-1?do=findComment&comment=3461163 Jeff 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkmoore Posted June 16, 2018 Share #29 Posted June 16, 2018 I just picked up the 28 LUX and didn't realize how big it is compared to my 28 Cron V2. I'm sure the IQ is beautiful as has been reported by everyone but the size is a legitimate reason to go for the cron v1 or v2. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
low325 Posted June 17, 2018 Share #30 Posted June 17, 2018 APO designation for a 35 might make you feel good, but it wouldn’t mean much technically, as Andy (adan) explains...https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/281798-does-anyone-expect-a-35mm-summicron-apo-in-the-future/page-1?do=findComment&comment=3461163 Jeff I guess the SL owners will be feeling good then. Karbe teased at the new park openings about a possible 35 APO SL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 17, 2018 Share #31 Posted June 17, 2018 I guess the SL owners will be feeling good then. Karbe teased at the new park openings about a possible 35 APO SL. Leica most definitely understands the magic 3 letters for their customers.... GAS Jeff 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-A-C Posted June 17, 2018 Share #32 Posted June 17, 2018 50 Lux ASPH - better bokeh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
odeon Posted June 17, 2018 Share #33 Posted June 17, 2018 Interestingly, but not surprisingly there was no one to speak up whether the owner would suffer from distortion or not. In my viewpoint, in using a wide, the distortion issue must be crucial. Another consideration, or reservation would be the degree of fall-off. In sprite of some shortcomings, 28'cron has a great character to be reflected on the sensor, or the film. Leica M (typ 240) 28'cron at f/2.0 ISO-2000 Izmir, Turkey 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now