Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I tested out the SL having owned the Q.  I loved the bright view finder- the photos that were perfect were amazing with great color and almost 3-D in appearance.  I didn't even mind the weight.  But... once inside the slow lenses and fast moving children did not work.  I looked at some of the amazing photos, then realized the lenses are not practical for photos indoors or for very fast children outside with the 24-90 zoom.  Leica please make some faster zoom lenses quickly- I really want to buy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The zooms are fast enough compared to the competition. I shot Nikon’s f/2.8 zooms (14-24, 24-70, 70-200) and it wasn’t the aperture the made a huge difference for what you’re describing.

 

The AF system was the biggest difference.

 

If you’re looking for something comparable to the Q, you won’t find it with zooms. Try the native primes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can shoot SL at ISO1600 without even thinking. The DNG file will later easily withstand a two-stop push. It makes the zooms fast enough. I've been using the SL with both zooms almost since the day that it was introduced, and most of what I do is shoot ballet. Believe me, it is much faster than children :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I tested out the SL having owned the Q.  I loved the bright view finder- the photos that were perfect were amazing with great color and almost 3-D in appearance.  I didn't even mind the weight.  But... once inside the slow lenses and fast moving children did not work.  I looked at some of the amazing photos, then realized the lenses are not practical for photos indoors or for very fast children outside with the 24-90 zoom.  Leica please make some faster zoom lenses quickly- I really want to buy.

If you have problem tracking children running outdoors with modern AF gear you probably dealing with either future Olympic medallists or characters from X-Man. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

My four and two years old grandchildren are also too fast, indoors. They often run at you much quicker than the SL and the 24-90 zoom can focus. Also tried the 50 SL Lux with latest SL firmware – not good enough for my grandchildren, perhaps even slower? Works though if they sit still as in front of an iPad screen.

Edited by ericborgstrom
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I tested out the SL having owned the Q.  I loved the bright view finder- the photos that were perfect were amazing with great color and almost 3-D in appearance.  I didn't even mind the weight.  But... once inside the slow lenses and fast moving children did not work.  I looked at some of the amazing photos, then realized the lenses are not practical for photos indoors or for very fast children outside with the 24-90 zoom.  Leica please make some faster zoom lenses quickly- I really want to buy.

 

I have had great success photographing my two young grandchildren since they were born using manual focus lenses primarily. There is an abundance of very fast, very fine MF lenses. Shooting moving targets indoors is a challenge, but it can be done, if you plan ahead and are prepared. With the SL, ISO 6400 is no problem, and even 12,500 is better than decent, if you use a good noise reduction program.

Edited by robgo2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

The fastest lens for the SL is the SL 50 (well, fast in the sense of aperture).

But now with the 3.1 firmware update the SL 50 is also in AF a fast lens - at least as fast and quiet as prime lenses from other providers. (Of course the SL 90-280 is still faster focusing in many cases, but the gap is much smaller now.).

For a while the SL 50 was maybe a reason to be disappointed with the SL system, but now it is a really great lens (and can rightfully be called a reference lens).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had great success photographing my two young grandchildren since they were born using manual focus lenses primarily. There is an abundance of very fast, very fine MF lenses. Shooting moving targets indoors is a challenge, but it can be done, if you plan ahead and are prepared. With the SL, ISO 6400 is no problem, and even 12,500 is better than decent, if you use a good noise reduction program.

Sorry, but a wonderful example of a misplaced modifier. So, your grandchildren were born using cameras? how precocious! :-)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...