Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting to think that somebody once apparently paid 10,000 BTC for 2 pizzas.

 

 

Hard to believe I sold a 50mm f1.0 Noctilux a few years ago for considerably less than the price of the least expensive M lens now available.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I remembered your saying so.

 

I don't miss the lens though, do you?

No. I only miss the £3000 or so extra that I could have sold it for if I'd hung on to it.

 

Could have been worse - I could have used 10,000 bitcoins to buy a couple of pizzas. :-)

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by wattsy
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

One kilo brick? Just to get shallow DOF and brag about it on Leica forums? Nope for me. I have some other lenses for it :) Nor, I'm the portraitist. I just live by most successful portrait photographers examples for it. Jane Bown with 85/2 as the portrait lens. And my daughter (also paid photographer) taking portraits by 24-105 f4 AF lens with image stabilizer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. I only miss the £3000 or so extra that I could have sold it for if I'd hung on to it.

 

Could have been worse - I could have used 10,000 bitcoins to buy a couple of pizzas. :-)

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I don't miss mine either . . . I've blissfully forgotten what I sold it for.

Glad to know you still have 10,000 bitcoins, at least you'll be able to afford the new 75!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Price aside, this is not for me - one of the primary reasons I keep a 75mm around is the extra-tight framing at 0.7/0.75 meters. 0.85m won't cut it.

 

Although it is understandable - when you focus close, you move all that glass farther out from the image plane/camera, and the lens barrel has to carry all that "cantilevered" weight hanging off the lens mount without torquing or binding the focusing (or floating element) helices/threads. Which means even more weight (thicker metal tubes).

 

And more viewfinder intrusion as well.

 

However, it seems to be an amazing technical exercise - mtf and almost zero distortion. Walter Mandler considered his 75 f/1.4 his greatest achievement, and I suspect Peter Karbe feels the same way (and should) about his 75 f/1.25.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter Karbe feels the same way (and should) about his 75 f/1.25.

Yeah? Should he? A 1055grams lens on an M? Where the 75lux was already considered as the heaviest reasonable lens for the M? Oh my poor M10 mount, I’ll protect you against such a monstrosity

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was fortunate to have used the pre-production M75Noc 2 months ago on my SL on a portraiture shoot.

The M75Noc is a fabulous lens with a identical character to the M50lux. I had the chance to take the same subject and location with the SL50LUX. The results were different in effect. The SL50LUX had very clinically good control to produce a realistic yet pleasing picture while the M75Noc produced a dramatic effect and the purple fringing effect identical to my M50LUX 0.95 due to very shallow DOF.

However I find it difficult to differentiate it from the M50Noc on pic effect. Shooting of the M50Noc, just tells me to get closer to subject as compared to the M75Noc. I do not get the passion to sell off my 0.95 and get in line to wait for the arrival of the 1.25.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...