Jump to content

Today is a sad day


mikemgb

Recommended Posts

That's a shame.  With the number of emulsions being dropped over the past few years, it makes sense to stock up on your favourites if you are able.  I've got a bunch of almost expired Provia in the freezer, along with bits and bobs of numerous films.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just shot and processed my last roll of Kodak BW400CN. It's been in the freezer for 6 years.

 

I like the look this film gave, I'll miss it.

How sad. My favourite B&W film

 

However, I've still got 30 or so rolls on ice......

Link to post
Share on other sites

How sad. My favourite B&W film

 

However, I've still got 30 or so rolls on ice......

I, too, have quite a few rolls in my fridge. I have access to some more - Perhaps I'd better stock up - It is nice film.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not having used BW400CN, is Ilford XP2 Super noticeably different?

 

J

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I haven't shot XP2 in 20 years so I don't know how it compares. I'm going to buy a couple of rolls to try out though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't shot XP2 in 20 years so I don't know how it compares. I'm going to buy a couple of rolls to try out though.

Highly recommend you going back to XP2. But sad to see the passing of BW400CN; I too was a fan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not having used BW400CN, is Ilford XP2 Super noticeably different?

 

J

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Properties are similar -long and smooth tone scale, sharp, good accutance, very fine grain. Both are really excellent films.

 

A big difference is that BW400CN has an orange mask like  colour negative film, while XP2 looks like a conventional B&W film. The mask was intended to make printing easy on colour paper by 1-hr processing shops. The orange mask makes BW400CN much tougher to print on normal B&W paper, while XP2 prints easily and beautifully.

 

XP2 is a wonderful alternative. Expose for 200ASA for optimum negatives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Properties are similar -long and smooth tone scale, sharp, good accutance, very fine grain. Both are really excellent films.

 

A big difference is that BW400CN has an orange mask like  colour negative film, while XP2 looks like a conventional B&W film. The mask was intended to make printing easy on colour paper by 1-hr processing shops. The orange mask makes BW400CN much tougher to print on normal B&W paper, while XP2 prints easily and beautifully.

 

XP2 is a wonderful alternative. Expose for 200ASA for optimum negatives.

Thank you, I just ordered some in 35mm and 120 to try it. I also ordered a new C41 kit, mine has been mixed for 5 months, I think it has processed 11 films and it's getting long in the tooth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel your sadness. The other day I was clearing out a cupboard and found an empty Kodachrome box...

At least BW400CN can still be processed, unlike those poor people who have freezers full of Kodachrome.

 

And yes, I miss Kodachrome too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've loaded a roll of BW400CN in my Canon F1 New in your honour, Mike. I'll see if the tribute results in better photography...

What makes me even more sad is that I just received a call to say my M2 that has been out for repair will be back with me tomorrow, I could have run the film through that rather than my III, a much better tribute.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel your sadness. The other day I was clearing out a cupboard and found an empty Kodachrome box...

Supposedly safe in the deep freezer but really, they might as well be as empty as the box you found.

 

I keep them to remind my wife that I really *am* an optimist,

s-a

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

s-a, your photo shows minutes of life not lived. :(

 

My sympathies. Now that the film is worthless it is time to try developing it for B&W. Shall we look into that?

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

s-a, your photo shows minutes of life not lived. :(

 

My sympathies. Now that the film is worthless it is time to try developing it for B&W. Shall we look into that?

.

You can get that Lomography cross processed look out of Kodachrome for just $25 per roll: https://shootfilmco.com/blogs/shoot-film-co/kodachrome-processed-in-color-seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

s-a, your photo shows minutes of life not lived. :(

 

My sympathies. Now that the film is worthless it is time to try developing it for B&W. Shall we look into that?

.

Especially the TechPan. I have a few rolls of 120 waiting for me to decide on a suitable subject. The Kodachrome B&W-developed images I've seen don't look great, but probably worth sacrificing a roll for the experience. I have 2 rolls of exposed Kodachrome 64, which I have no idea what they are of (at least 25 years ago), so I figure that's worth making a remjet mess for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

s-a, your photo shows minutes of life not lived. :(

 

My sympathies. Now that the film is worthless it is time to try developing it for B&W. Shall we look into that?

.

I think I'll hang on to these. I've never met anyone familiar with Kodachrome (the bad processing period aside) who didn't remark about the images it produced, a quality they couldn't quite put their finger on. These represent a path I chose not to take, a fetish. So it's back into the freezer they go, with the squash and peas. For B&W there's still Tri-X (& Co). You know that has changed too but it's still pretty damn good. What really matters is getting out there regardless the film (or camera).

 

s-a

Link to post
Share on other sites

Especially the TechPan. I have a few rolls of 120 waiting for me to decide on a suitable subject. The Kodachrome B&W-developed images I've seen don't look great, but probably worth sacrificing a roll for the experience. I have 2 rolls of exposed Kodachrome 64, which I have no idea what they are of (at least 25 years ago), so I figure that's worth making a remjet mess for.

Tech-Pan's extended red sensitivity was a palette I never liked. Can't argue about the grain though.

 

s-a

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...