Jump to content

Has anyone tried the 50mm APO on the M-10


Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I have just traded a 50mm Summilux for a 50mm APO on the basis that the M10's sensor will more than make up for the slower aperture and I'll have a smaller, lighter and sharper lens. Time will tell if it was worth the price difference!

 

 

IMO they are completely different lenses with different looks.

I had the 50 APO, Noctilux and Summilux until just recently when I wondered why I needed three 50mm lenses :)

 

After a medical exam showed I had a screw loose, I sold the Summilux.

I quickly regretted that decision...I think I will end up buying another one soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nowadays WOW is good

On the 'more days, more pays' basis, Neil, but not on a productivity / attract rare capital one...

 

On the M10 / Elmar M, I would definitely say use it before making any decisions on buying an APO. The Elmar M is a fantastic lens, and you alrady have it rolling around your pocket.

 

At some stage you may like to think about whether buying additional 50's is adding anything to your photography, or just diluting your use of what you already have. For a collector, more is better. For a photographer, I tend to think the opposite is often so. YVMV.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

IMO they are completely different lenses with different looks.

I had the 50 APO, Noctilux and Summilux until just recently when I wondered why I needed three 50mm lenses :)

 

After a medical exam showed I had a screw loose, I sold the Summilux.

I quickly regretted that decision...I think I will end up buying another one soon.

I did the same with my 50 Summilux ASPH. For me the Noctilux 0.95 at 1.4 has similar rendering so I've never missed the Summilux. The only big tradeoff is obviously the weight.

 

The 50 APO is there as a more perfect, clinical and compact lens.

 

I love shooting 50mm lenses. All ages, all types. Each has its own look, feel and strengths. Can never have too many lenses!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

On the 'more days, more pays' basis, Neil, but not on a productivity / attract rare capital one...

 

On the M10 / Elmar M, I would definitely say use it before making any decisions on buying an APO. The Elmar M is a fantastic lens, and you alrady have it rolling around your pocket.

 

At some stage you may like to think about whether buying additional 50's is adding anything to your photography, or just diluting your use of what you already have. For a collector, more is better. For a photographer, I tend to think the opposite is often so. YVMV.

You Very Much Very ?????lol

 

I loved my Noctilux on the M240 just before I got rid of it.................couldn't focus it worth a sh!t at the beginning due to not having the correct diaper on. I also agree that to have two of the same focus length doesn't make sence, but maybe having the Elmer M and the Noctilux would/could make sence if you know what I mean ? 

 

Neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

You Very Much Very ?????lol

 

I loved my Noctilux on the M240 just before I got rid of it.................couldn't focus it worth a sh!t at the beginning due to not having the correct diaper on. I also agree that to have two of the same focus length doesn't make sence, but maybe having the Elmer M and the Noctilux would/could make sence if you know what I mean ? 

 

Neil

 

 

 

I can only imagine how sh!!ty it must be trying to focus a Noctilux wide open while not having the right diaper on, Neil. 

Glad you found a proper solution

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You Very Much Very ?????lol

 

I loved my Noctilux on the M240 just before I got rid of it.................couldn't focus it worth a sh!t at the beginning due to not having the correct diaper on. I also agree that to have two of the same focus length doesn't make sence, but maybe having the Elmer M and the Noctilux would/could make sence if you know what I mean ?

 

Neil

I always use the EVF for focusing my Noctilux. Nail focus every time.

 

I figure once you put a huge, heavy lens like that on the compact M240/M10 etc what difference does a small plastic viewfinder make!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always use the EVF for focusing my Noctilux. Nail focus every time.

 

I figure once you put a huge, heavy lens like that on the compact M240/M10 etc what difference does a small plastic viewfinder make!

 

 

the difference has nothing to do with size or weight...its all about speed. I have no issues nailing focus with the rangefinder and its twice as fast.

BTW- no diopters and I wear glasses. It just takes some practice.

 

I use the EVF about 25% of the time though with the Noctilux, and will usually switch back and forth leaving the EVF on the camera. But its so much more enjoyable shooting w/o EVF even with improved performance on M10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the difference has nothing to do with size or weight...its all about speed. I have no issues nailing focus with the rangefinder and its twice as fast.

BTW- no diopters and I wear glasses. It just takes some practice.

 

I use the EVF about 25% of the time though with the Noctilux, and will usually switch back and forth leaving the EVF on the camera. But its so much more enjoyable shooting w/o EVF even with improved performance on M10.

Yeah I guess it depends on your style of shooting too. I usually shoot quite slow so the EVF speeed is not a huge problem. For speed shooting the rangefinder is much better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I guess it depends on your style of shooting too. I usually shoot quite slow so the EVF speeed is not a huge problem. For speed shooting the rangefinder is much better.

 

 

and by speed I didn't necessarily mean speed :)

its more about the blackout and clunkiness of using the EVF...even with the improvements in the M10, the blackout still interrupts your connection with the subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and by speed I didn't necessarily mean speed :)

its more about the blackout and clunkiness of using the EVF...even with the improvements in the M10, the blackout still interrupts your connection with the subject.

Yes I agree the blackout is still there but much better then the M240. Shooting landscape is no problem for me, shooting street photography would be but working on the streets at 0.95 would become an exercise in luck rather than skill ;-)
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Hi Neil,

 

 The 50 APO is great on the M10. Is very compact and well balanced. The colors are wonderful. I have been using the 35 Lux FLE, the 90 APO and the 50 APO on the M10 so far and the 50 APO is by far my favorite, just in another league.

 

 PD, The correct diaper on is mandatory with this lens. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

and by speed I didn't necessarily mean speed :)

its more about the blackout and clunkiness of using the EVF...even with the improvements in the M10, the blackout still interrupts your connection with the subject.

Completely agree.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Hi Neil,

 

 The 50 APO is great on the M10. Is very compact and well balanced. The colors are wonderful. I have been using the 35 Lux FLE, the 90 APO and the 50 APO on the M10 so far and the 50 APO is by far my favorite, just in another league.

 

 PD, The correct diaper on is mandatory with this lens. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...