Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

5 hours ago, raphael said:

I'm considering buying the magnifier again.
I had the 1.25x version once and sold it. Unfortunately, I do not remember why. Probably because of the protruding bump on the back of the camera.

Two questions:
1. Which one would you suggest (1.25x or 1.4x) when I'm mostly shooting a 50mm lens (actually it's the 45mm Planar)
2. Does the protruding bump bother you when wearing the camera around your neck?

1. I find the 1.25x to be a good compromise of magnification and size.

2. It doesn't protrude any more than the thumb grips I use, so I haven't noticed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 1.25 when a 75mm lens is mounted to my M 262.   I don't think I'd use it with a 50mm lens, but I don't have a 50mm for my M so can't say for sure.   The protruding bump doesn't bother me, possibly because with my 75mm lens the camera tends to hang from its strap lens down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2016 at 12:20 AM, lucerne said:


I visited my optician with my camera and he was able to test my eyes with the various diopter strengths to find the optimal value which I then purchased from a leica dealer. I wouldn't be without it now on my M.

Would it be possible to hav a slight diopter adapter? I find my M9 Monochrom has the optimal place virtually for the RF patch; however on my newer camera I have to squeeze my eyes, strain them. I do wear glasses. Over time of course I need new glasses (last time 3 years ago), and that agrravates the problem of seeing clear close by.

now that tells me that adding a slight diopter would bring the virtual position of the RF spot closer to where it is on the M9M. Slight - not intended to replace my glasses.

is that a good reasoning, idea?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alberti said:

Would it be possible to hav a slight diopter adapter? I find my M9 Monochrom has the optimal place virtually for the RF patch; however on my newer camera I have to squeeze my eyes, strain them. I do wear glasses. Over time of course I need new glasses (last time 3 years ago), and that agrravates the problem of seeing clear close by.

now that tells me that adding a slight diopter would bring the virtual position of the RF spot closer to where it is on the M9M. Slight - not intended to replace my glasses.

is that a good reasoning, idea?

That’s might be difficult.   Plus 0.5 or Minus 0.5 but nothing in between.
or is there a 0.5.??

  Talk to an optician.

 Good luck

 

Edited by lucerne
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica used to sell a diopter ring to fit with your own lens, but as far as I know stopped doing so, as most opticians switched from manual lens shaping machines to automatic ones, and those cannot do a round 10 mm lens.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks, indeed found the nearest dealer (kameraExpress) lists them, € 155.- but it is for a Leica M (the picture shows a film camera) so I'm 100% sure this is not for a digital M10. Jaap will be right, not available. But wait . . .

1) I probably should visit my optician & [also] get myself a new pair of lenses measured, because when new, the distant part allows reading sharp to less than 1m, by now it is worse and drifting towards 2m.

- For me, wearing my bi-focal glasses, infinity is sharp, and my natural vision is sharp with a 'visus' of 140 ; i.e. a 20/10-vision - , so I also quickly see any deviations.

2) BHP says something in line with my reasoning and suggests I look in my manual.

Quote

Improving the viewfinder image for far-sighted users, this Leica Correction Lens M provides a +0.5-dioptric adjustment to the camera's finder for more comfortable viewing and a reduced need for wearing eyeglasses while shooting. Leica rangefinders, by default, are preset to -0.5 diopters, and this correction lens will bring the final strength to 0.0 diopters.

Manual: The Leica Correction Lenses M [Material number  24008] provide optimum eye-to-camera matching for the M10, making composing images in the viewfinder more precise and comfortable. They are available in grades of +/- 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 diopters.

Please note that the Leica M-Viewfinder is preset by default to -0.5 diopters to guarantee a comfortable view through the viewfinder at medium distances.

Q: is there indeed a difference between M8, M9 and the Leica-M (240), M10?

 

Edited by Alberti
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Alberti said:

Q: is there indeed a difference between M8, M9 and the Leica-M (240), M10?

Yes, the M10 has enlarged viewfinder so the eyepiece needs adapter to use former accessories.

I use 24001 "thread adapter" on my M10 (14mm wide) to be able to screw-in my magnifier x1.25 or diopters (12mm wide) from my former/older Leica M.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...