Jump to content

Leica Vario-Elmarit R 21-35mm f/3.5 Lens VS two other brand zooms


thebarnman

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

3 hours ago, wlaidlaw said:

I could not get any of the 21-35 sellers to knock a single cent/centime/milli-zloty off their asking prices, which took them outside my budget. I did find a 24/2.8 ROM lens, where the German seller (from whom I have bought in the past) reduced the price from €1100 to €1001, which I therefore bought. Unlike some other sellers, this one includes the pin mount hood and I am sure I must have an e60 skylight or UV filter somewhere. 

Wilson

Ah well, worth a try. At least it gives some idea of the degree of elasticity in the market (that is to say, little or none)!

According to Brian Bower (Leica Reflex Photography) this lens has a floating element, and has a very good performance, which evolved originally from a Minolta design. According to Puts, Minolta stopped production, so Leitz had to adapt the design to glass from different sources. I presume that, being a ROM lens, yours will be the latest type, therefore with the greatest amount of Leica tweaking  to the original optics.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, masjah said:

Ah well, worth a try. At least it gives some idea of the degree of elasticity in the market (that is to say, little or none)!

According to Brian Bower (Leica Reflex Photography) this lens has a floating element, and has a very good performance, which evolved originally from a Minolta design. According to Puts, Minolta stopped production, so Leitz had to adapt the design to glass from different sources. I presume that, being a ROM lens, yours will be the latest type, therefore with the greatest amount of Leica tweaking  to the original optics.

 

John, 

It will be interesting to compare the Elmarit-R to my 25mm/2.8 ZM Biogon. I bought the Biogon about 13 years ago, when I was still occasionally photographing yacht interiors for money. It was more rectilinear and a more recent design than the 24/2.8 Elmarit-M and it is an excellent performer. It is very resistant to flare, which is important, when you are using multiple snoot lights to illuminate the interior evenly. Of course I can now do a direct comparison on the SL, as I have the M adapter L and R adapter L. 

Wilson

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 11/24/2016 at 10:15 AM, JonPB said:

To update to my post from last month about scale focusing the 21-35 on an M9:

 

35mm appears to be as marked.

 

21mm appears to be one mark closer than indicated. To explain, the 21-35 has marks in meters at infinity, 7, 3, 2, 1.2, etc. If you want to focus on a subject 7 meters away, set the lens to 3 meters; if you want to focus on a subject 3 meters away, set the lens to 2 meters.

 

I found the same on my 21-35 on a A7. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I caved in a few months ago and bought a lovely example of the 21-35. It works beautifully on my M10-R as well as on my various R cameras. I might as well sell my 21 Super Angulon-R 3 cam and 24 Elmarit-R ROM now, as I don't see them getting any use. 

Wilson

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...