Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

color me just as grateful for the focusing tip. Even though I looked at all the Photoshop tools, and couldn't find the grateful tool, I colored myself that anyway.

 

Two additional points from trying this:

1. the down arrow de-zooms the screen

2. using "white" for peak focusing is really effective in macro, since "white" is not a color but rather it vibrates the picture. it really makes peak focusing dead-on

Edited by bags27
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if you go so far, we allready could give Dimitris the Nickname: Merlin

 

 

Oh I like it. Don’t know if Demitris would. He’ll have a vote. Maybe. :-)

 

 

Haha, thank you for the kind comments guys!! I really don't mind whatever you call me (as long you don't call me an @$£%^! or whatever!)

 

By the way, the Adafruit neo pixel ring arrived and it works great. I will use it as the first step for prototyping my ring flash idea. It seems it is quite a popular cheap way for ring light. 

 

https://learn.adafruit.com/3d-printed-camera-led-ring

 

 

L1210245.jpg

Edited by zampelis
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I like it. Don’t know if Demitris would. He’ll have a vote. Maybe. :-)

 

It´s  this, what i mean: "Merlin (WelshMyrddin) is a legendary figure best known as the wizard featured in (...) Welsh Poetry"

 

 

Because zampelis Pictures are more than just Photos. For sure they are visual Poetry...  :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it utterly pretentious for the film "purists", on one point to reject post editing techniques and on the other point to willingly use any type of film they like from their big arsenal in order to alter the colours to the way they like, depending on the occasion.

This is always a discussion worth having. Until a few years ago, I resisted post-processing, but then I conceded that, it's not just choice of film, but all the tricks in developing and printing that evolved over the century when film was king that made it a lot closer to digital post-processing.

 

And, of course, now that film is digitized and can even be rendered in massive TIFF files, there's very little difference in technology. I'm sure it would be quite easy to chose one of the film presets in post-processing a photo from a digital camera and compare it to a photo from film that's been digitized and have them look fairy identical. I absolutely love the film thread on this site, and there are many photos there that maintain the "film look." But that's an aesthetic choice, not a moral one!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Flowers today in Chatham, MA. Macro. It's especially tough getting super sharp photos out in the the wind. I took hundreds of shots to get a few that are decent. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Flowers

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...