Jump to content

Lux 50 Asph to Summi 50 AA


ananda

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Nocticron?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but you should acknowledge it was an amusing rejoinder.

Not especially. In the Leica M world, the term or even the lens nocticron is as relevant as the fabled PizzaDonut.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is summi? Summarit? Summar? Summitar? Summilux? Summicron? "Summi" is so ambiguous.

 

Cron means only one thing: summicron. No ambiguity.

 

So then I guess you'd be fine with marrit, mitar, and milux.  'Cron' is just as annoying IMO....as you say, we have enough useless terms already.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

So then I guess you'd be fine with marrit, mitar, and milux.  'Cron' is just as annoying IMO....as you say, we have enough useless terms already.

 

Jeff

 

 

Crony?

 

Rick

Link to post
Share on other sites

So then I guess you'd be fine with marrit, mitar, and milux. 'Cron' is just as annoying IMO....as you say, we have enough useless terms already.

 

Jeff

This is basic's basic comon sense and I can't believe it's so hard to understand. You simply can't ask people to choose between "two summi" and expect them to understand that you are refering to a summilux and a Summicron. Not Even Gandalf has this power.

 

But you can always ask people about "two crons" and expect them to understand that you are talking about two Summicrons.

 

Besides, the terms Cron and Lux are standardized terms that have an exact meaning. They aren't useless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides, the terms Cron and Lux are standardized terms that have an exact meaning. They aren't useless.

 

Oh, you mean Lux as in Summilux or Noctilux?

 

If not useless terms, certainly grating IMO.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

...

Besides, the terms Cron and Lux are standardized terms that have an exact meaning. They aren't useless.

This is a meaning of the term "standardized term" I haven't been aware of before.

 

I agree that they're not useless. Using those terms turns your well thought out posts into gibberish for all but the initiate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, you mean Lux as in Summilux or Noctilux?

 

If not useless terms, certainly grating IMO.

 

Jeff

Noctilux is never refered to as lux.

 

Obviously you know all this. Basic stuff, really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeff S, on 05 May 2016 - 13:31, said:snapback.png

Oh, you mean Lux as in Summilux or Noctilux?

If not useless terms, certainly grating IMO.

Jeff

Noctilux is never refered to as lux.

Obviously you know all this. Basic stuff, really.

 

I think Jeff was being sarcastic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noctilux is never refered to as lux.

 

Obviously you know all this. Basic stuff, really.

 

I'm awaiting your Leica compendium.  I'm sure it will include better terms like Noct or Nocti.

 

Methinks you don't understand the concept of irritating or grating.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cron an Lux etc. have a clear meaning: they indicate that the user is a fully paid-up member of the Leica incrowd and a proud Leica Man.

Crons. Noctis, Luxes etc. are solely intended for use on the M10. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...