Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

When I get a new car,  I run 1000 grit wet dry over all the corners.  Then I take a punch and  light hammer and chip the paint on forward sides.  That way it looks old and professionally driven and thieves don`t bother it.

 

I like the cameras pristine so they go into a blue velvet bag, Chevis Regal, before going in the camera carry bag.  

 

Personal choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually thinner can be quite effective, used that on my red dot to create a metal colored one :)

 

I appologize for the crappy cropped iPhone photo :)

 

24401723139_240bc2daaf_b_d.jpg

IMHO - you ruined the mystique - I hope the Mojo was retained.. 2each his own..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I think about this topic....the only way to "brass" your camera is by using it .....like milage 

 
It also makes  me chuckle
Lots of years ago, we used our cameras hard,with less thought. They were sturdy tools to be used and not babied.  A beat up kit  was a badge of courage.
 
I think as our cameras became little computers we treat them differently. Bump a camera today and you have a big repair. They get the same amount of use but I treat them with more care.
 
So today I don't want my cameras to look used. I'm far more concerned with bumps, dirt ,sand etc.I dont miss shots I'm just more thoughtful with my cameras
 
Just a thought from then and now.
Yours are welcome
 
 
Edited by ECohen
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A beat up kit  was a badge of courage.

 

Odd, I always thought that a beat up camera was more often than not the sign that it belonged to somebody else (as in employer) ;) .

 

And FWIW few professionals I've ever known have deliberately treated their cameras badly - nobody wants a camera to break at an inopportune moment if they can avoid it least of all somebody who relies on it to make a living with.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd, I always thought that a beat up camera was more often than not the sign that it belonged to somebody else (as in employer) ;) .

 

And FWIW few professionals I've ever known have deliberately treated their cameras badly - nobody wants a camera to break at an inopportune moment if they can avoid it least of all somebody who relies on it to make a living with.

 

 

I was so focused on getting the shot/shots and a camera was  just a hammer.

Also Hasselblads and Nikons of old could take a licking. Its not like you threw  them onto a cement floor but you didn't baby then either....it wasn't deliberate ...it just was.

If you needed another hammer /camera ....you bought one. They were tools to be used...and all day every day they were used hard...of course you were careful.....but the job came first

You rarely knew what you would be walking into mud,  rain,salt water, a dirty factory....comerical photography isn't clean 

 

And yep my cameras were used,  not mint....... and they didn't owe me anything .  Did I say always carry a backup, thats part of being a professional? 

 

But the point is todays camera are little computers more delicate than cameras of old......don't you think?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

But the point is todays camera are little computers more delicate than cameras of old......don't you think?

 

When I was studying the newest thing came out - the Nikon F3. Totally reliant on electronics and we were told that it was likely that the lcd would need replacing after some years use (did it, I'm doubtful). Are digital cameras any less reliable? I don't know. Digitals shoot a great many more images generally speaking so long lived in terms of time or usage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

todays Leica M240 cant thai the same knocking around as a Nikon F or Hasselbad ELM .......can it?

 

Back in the mid 80's I worked/assisted  a NYC fashion photographer....We or he was shooting a  layout in the Caribbean. Plunk there went the motor driven Nikon F with the 105 in to the blue water. With out missing a beat he turned and said "get me another 105"  and the job went on

 
I guess I had bad teachers;-)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if they are more unreliable, I think the monitors and contacts are more prone to general knocks and possible dropping... My old D90 is still plodding along & the Fuji/Leica 1.3mp Digilux I bought around '97 is still going strong.../

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...