Jump to content

New Leica M in September 2016? The speculations.


Paulus

Recommended Posts

x
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Why? What has happened today? What news have I missed?

I talked to some people. The talk was also about how some in the management behaved the last time. Not with a "heart" for Leica as a beautiful camera, but more a "hard" for profit. Profit can be good or course, but it made me a little pessimistic about the outcome of the new M. No real facts. Nobody says anything about a new M. ..But , normally around this time, they were saying something between the lines, but now. Nothing.

 

On the other hand, in the time that they annonced the MP as a succesor/teamplayer after the M7, or should we say, M6, i cannot recall that anybody saw that coming. Same with the M8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, it is going to be a very nice one. They just need some more time for testing for the more complicated aspects.

Leica is very well aware that especially with the M series profit is generated by appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

There are small improvements to the electronics (faster EVF, etc.) that might be nice on a new M. More than anything, I'd like to see it lose some weight and perhaps a little bit of bulk (though the size of the M Typ 240 in hand doesn't bother me, I picked up a friend's M8 (which I also had a long time ago) recently and it was great.

 

I recently went on a long trip and brought my M and my Q. My Q ended up coming with me almost everywhere; the M stayed in the hotel safe in the evenings. Some of this was the better high ISO  performance of the Q, but I don't mind a little bit of noise and would have happily taken the M. Honestly, the biggest deciding factor was the weight. I'm not looking for the M to go plastic, of course--I think some heft helps me steady my shots. But the Q seems to be just about perfect from a weight standpoint, at least for me.

 

I very much like shooting with my M and my (new!) Monochrom Typ 246. I'll wait and see what happens with the SL but I'm probably set for a long time. That said, I'd consider a lighter, smaller M in a heartbeat, even with the same electronics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to speculate that it won't have autofocus in which case thighslapper and I will have a discussion about a ten pound note.  :D

 

Having bought a 2016 Jeep Wrangler (for delivery tomorrow) with Dana 44 locking rear axles front and rear, a heavy-duty manual transfer case, and six-speed manual transmission with standard AM/FM/CD radio and manual heater controls to replace my aging Toyota FJ Cruiser with HD locking rear axle, six-speed manual transmission, manual transfer case, AM/FM/CD, and manual heater controls, I'd be disappointed in anything BUT a manual-focus rangefinder/viewfinder M.  Can I get in on that bet?  ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I talked to some people. The talk was also about how some in the management behaved the last time. Not with a "heart" for Leica as a beautiful camera, but more a "hard" for profit. Profit can be good or course, but it made me a little pessimistic about the outcome of the new M. No real facts. Nobody says anything about a new M. ..But , normally around this time, they were saying something between the lines, but now. Nothing.

 

On the other hand, in the time that they annonced the MP as a succesor/teamplayer after the M7, or should we say, M6, i cannot recall that anybody saw that coming. Same with the M8.

What's wrong with making a profit by making and selling cameras? If they make a profit, it means they are making something that people want at a price they're willing to pay.

Making a profit does not have to mean competing with everyone else in the mass market by lowest cost manufacturing - it can mean producing a quality product with strong design and features that other cameras don't have. Leica are not the first to thing along these lines and make it work.

 

The one thing that is absolutely certain is that if you do not set out to make a profit, you will be out of business pretty quickly.

I'm glad Leica tries to make a profit!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's wrong with making a profit by making and selling cameras? If they make a profit, it means they are making something that people want at a price they're willing to pay.

Making a profit does not have to mean competing with everyone else in the mass market by lowest cost manufacturing - it can mean producing a quality product with strong design and features that other cameras don't have. Leica are not the first to thing along these lines and make it work.

 

The one thing that is absolutely certain is that if you do not set out to make a profit, you will be out of business pretty quickly.

I'm glad Leica tries to make a profit!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbsJ7j9GxgE

 

Unfortunately only in german since Enterprise media now seems to own the rights to the english one :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's wrong with making a profit by making and selling cameras? If they make a profit, it means they are making something that people want at a price they're willing to pay.

Making a profit does not have to mean competing with everyone else in the mass market by lowest cost manufacturing - it can mean producing a quality product with strong design and features that other cameras don't have. Leica are not the first to thing along these lines and make it work.

 

The one thing that is absolutely certain is that if you do not set out to make a profit, you will be out of business pretty quickly.

I'm glad Leica tries to make a profit!

I learnt in bookkeeping classes, that there are different ways of making a profit. You can make a profit for instance by selling your stores and then renting them for a lower price. Fire your experienced workers and take cheap young labourers. Fire your good managers, because they are thinking, this is not the way to handel and hiring cheaper " yes " sayers. Just exemples, but there are different ways of making a profit. Some profits are short term profits which destroy your firm. Others are long term descisions making a solid business. Making a profit is not always about selling an item. It's the way you structure your firm, or the way you please your investers/stockholders.

I can sel 1000 items without making a profit, but I also can sel 10 items for the same price and make a huge profit. It's all about management and bookkeeping I believe, but of course something has to be sold in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until now no news of a new Leica M. But because christmas is coming. I have some requests for Leica AG

 

Please make the new Leica the same as the M-P  240 with some enhancements.

 

Better sensor

 

Higher ISO

 

3 pictures per second and holding until SD card is full.

 

 

That's all, thank you!

My requests would be -

 

1:  Lose the video button - and video capability too while we're at it

2:  Back illuminated CMOS sensor

3:  Higher maximum ISO, perhaps around 50,000. 

4:  Same dimensions as the M240/M-P (not an overgrown "M-P 5" sized camera)

5:  Lose the live view button.  Activating live view inadvertently when shooting in portrait orientation is a pain in the ass. Make live view selection a menu option.

6:  For the love of all that is holy, no touch screen!!

 

Why #1 and #6, you ask?  Simple:  The M cameras are still cameras - there's no need for video.  And the M cameras are cameras, not video games.  There's no need for a touch screen that will inadvertently change settings in the middle of a shoot the way the damn live view button does. 

 

These changes would make an outstanding camera even better.  Dropping video and forsaking a touch screen on the M240/M-P successor would make it more of a camera oriented to professional photographers IMHO; this would be a good step forward as Leica already has many offerings for the hobbyist and/or casual photographer folks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My requests would be -

 

1:  Lose the video button - and video capability too while we're at it

2:  Back illuminated CMOS sensor

3:  Higher maximum ISO, perhaps around 50,000. 

4:  Same dimensions as the M240/M-P (not an overgrown "M-P 5" sized camera)

5:  Lose the live view button.  Activating live view inadvertently when shooting in portrait orientation is a pain in the ass. Make live view selection a menu option.

6:  For the love of all that is holy, no touch screen!!

 

Why #1 and #6, you ask?  Simple:  The M cameras are still cameras - there's no need for video.  The M cameras are cameras, not video games.  There's no need for a touch screen that will inadvertently change settings in the middle of a shot the way the damn live view button does.

Red highlight mine.

I agree it is a pain. This is why LV and movie buttons are inactivated for me all the time in M240. If need them then they are accessible by menu (stored in user profile).

 

I don't understand the repeated calls (by some) to remove these features. They can be configured to disappear. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...