jdlaing Posted March 27, 2015 Share #81 Posted March 27, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Focus peaking is for sissies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Hi jdlaing, Take a look here Is there a new M on the way?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Manoleica Posted March 27, 2015 Share #82 Posted March 27, 2015 Focus peaking is for sissies. narrow minds in Texas.......... It's like syncro' not needed but a great advantage Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted March 27, 2015 Share #83 Posted March 27, 2015 As is movie, live view and focus peaking ... Maybe. But, once the LV genie was out of the bottle... Rick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gpwhite Posted March 27, 2015 Share #84 Posted March 27, 2015 Taken - gladly. Have a look at the sensor array of the (4/3rds) sensor array of the OM-D, with sensor cleaning and stabilisation. A similar ff sensor would add at least 5 mm to the thickness of the M body.... Interesting observation you make, Jaap. But why, then, is a Sony A7II thinner than my M240? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted March 27, 2015 Share #85 Posted March 27, 2015 Interesting observation you make, Jaap. But why, then, is a Sony A7II thinner than my M240? It isn't... once the adapter is attached it is actually thicker. Rick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mornnb Posted March 27, 2015 Share #86 Posted March 27, 2015 But why, then, is a Sony A7II thinner than my M240? The mount flange distance. Sony's saved a whole 1cm by bringing the lens closer to the sensor. E Mount. 18mm M Mount. 27.80 mm EF Mount. 44 mm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.