Rus Posted November 25, 2014 Share #1 Â Posted November 25, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi guys, I've noticed an issue with the Canon LTM 50mm F1.2 lens that I have, and I'd be grateful if anyone could shed some light on it. Â The lens works fine in daylight situations...nothing weird whatsoever...the "bokeh" of backgrounds without bright spot light sources is quite smooth... However... at night with bright spots.... the bokeh ball shows a weird shape inside them.... Â Â Here is the 100% crop: Â And more similar shots: Â 100% Crop: Â The Lens is fine when I look through it. But when I put a strong light through it at certain angles..I can see this bluish patch shown in the first photo below. Sometimes you can also faintly make out the edge of it when there is a strong light source, as shown in the 3rd photo below. Â I have attempted a partial disassembly of the lens..(separating the front groups of elements and the rear groups, it's pretty easy with this lens)..and I know the defect is in the rear groups. What's more it does not seem to be on the rearmost element, nor the surface of the lens element immediately behind the aperture blades. I'm suspecting its on a surface somewhere in between. Â Can anyone identify this bluish patch perhaps? Is it some dried up fluid? or is it a coating problem? (Since it leaves this distinct edges in the bokeh ball I'm wondering if it is in fact a coating problem...) I hope it is not some problem occurring to the glue that holds the two lens elements together in the rear groups..coz that will be a huge pain to clean.... Â Anyway..all opinions and suggestions welcome!! Â Thanks!! Â -Ed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 Hi Rus, Take a look here Weird Coating / cleaning mark problem??. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Rus Posted November 25, 2014 Author Share #2 Â Posted November 25, 2014 Oops...forgot to include a key photo: Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgcm Posted November 26, 2014 Share #3 Â Posted November 26, 2014 Rus, a do it yourself is not advisable. In your shoes, I would send the lens to a reputable shop for cleaning. Ciao Franco Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbealnz Posted November 26, 2014 Share #4 Â Posted November 26, 2014 I'm guessing separation? Gary Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted November 26, 2014 Share #5  Posted November 26, 2014 I'm guessing separation?Gary  Me too think that is a problem of this kind... can be a degradation of the glue/cement that couples two glass element or, more probable imho, some kind of stress (not a shock, a longterm stress) that forced the two coupled surfaces to separate : I haven't idea on how is the repair situation on Canon lenses.... on many Leica lenses, even old, the issue can be solved by expert labs (I have it done recently, for a similar problem, on a lens dated 1964). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted November 26, 2014 Share #6 Â Posted November 26, 2014 It looks like separation to me too - I can't see a coating problem looking like this unless there was an obvious ingress of something to cause it. FWIW I have a 35mm Summicron v.4 which had separation of the rear doublet - this showed as 'Newton's rings', like colour zebra's stripes, when looking through the lens and a slight performance loss in one corner. I am fortunate in that I was able to use a local optical expert to disassemble and then re-cement this doublet - this IS a specialist job as the elements need to be realigned to very tight tolerances indeed. Whilst I disassembled much of the lens, final removal of the doublet was undertaken by a Leica specialist, as I couldn't get it out, and who is rebuilding the lens at the moment. As I paid very little for the lens it has proved economic to do this. Â If you want the lens repaired and rebuilt you may well need to source two services - a competent repairer who can disassemble the lens and reassemble it after another specialist has separated the elements, cleaned them and re-cemented them to relevant tolerances. Be aware that today they will use a UV curing adhesive (the Summicron does not readily transmit UV apparently and I was informed of this as it probably needed a strong dose) which once cured, I believe, will be difficult to disassemble again so it must be correct first time. Â The problem you have is viability of repair cost - its perfectly possible to find specialists and repair such problems but is unlikely to be cheap (I was fortunate in that I knew the relevant person to re-cement the lens as a 'one-off' so it was not too costly). So I suspect that you may need to look at replacement value versus repair cost I'm afraid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bocaburger Posted November 26, 2014 Share #7  Posted November 26, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I have a 35mm Summicron v.4 which had separation of the rear doublet - this showed as 'Newton's rings', like colour zebra's stripes, when looking through the lens  I've seen that exact issue before on that particular model lens. I'm hoping it doesn't happen with mine, but I have a v.3 to back it up just in case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted November 26, 2014 Share #8 Â Posted November 26, 2014 I've seen that exact issue before on that particular model lens. I'm hoping it doesn't happen with mine, but I have a v.3 to back it up just in case. I'm pretty sure that it was an impact which caused the problem although it was there when I got the lens. I am under the impression that the cement was a UV cured adhesive not Canada Balsam though I can't remember where I found this out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted November 26, 2014 Share #9 Â Posted November 26, 2014 Welcome to Focal Point - Lens Repair and Lens Cleaning Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted November 26, 2014 Share #10 Â Posted November 26, 2014 Yep, the defect is replicated in the OOF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted November 26, 2014 Share #11 Â Posted November 26, 2014 Thanks for pointing this out! I learn something new everyday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted November 26, 2014 Share #12 Â Posted November 26, 2014 On my lens I was told 'optical centring is better than 30 seconds now' - I don't know what is a good or bad figure but have been told that this is pretty good.... anyone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.