Jump to content

Lecia Rumors claim partial upgrade to MP for M owners


hockey44

Recommended Posts

Since the buffer is out-- any speculation on what this might be and cost? Unless local service centers can do it I suspect this means a long time to wait...(starting in Q1 2015?)

 

Most probably: LCD sapphire screen cover and -maybe- top brass cover replaced or top engraving.

 

The cost of the additional memory (2GB vs 1GB in the M-P) should be lower than the cost of work time in the upgrading process, so I expect M + upgrade to be more expensive than M-P.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice of Leica to offer this, but unless the cosmetically improved top plate (or the big button vs the big red dot) or sapphire LCD is critical to your work, I don't quite see the point of investing further $$ into a M240. None of those changes will affect one's working style with the camera or have any impact on image quality. I'd rather save my money for the next model, which should have such things as improved EVF, processor upgrade from current Maestro and who knows what else (I am not looking for more megapixels but I suppose they may do it anyhow).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really split. I guess it depends on the cost, but there's no real photographic impact which is sort of why I wouldn't sell my M240 to upgrade. I just wish they'd do these at the beginning of the product line rather than late in the cycle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I would loved to have the lovely writing on the top plate. The downside is, it will cost me money whilst not helping my photographing skills in any way. :p

 

If everything had to be shoved through a Utilitarian Calculus to be justified we'd all be wearing Mao jackets. Thank goodness that's not the case.

 

s-a

Link to post
Share on other sites

If everything had to be shoved through a Utilitarian Calculus to be justified we'd all be wearing Mao jackets. Thank goodness that's not the case.

 

 

 

s-a

 

 

Point taken (and extremely well made). You're right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If everything had to be shoved through a Utilitarian Calculus to be justified we'd all be wearing Mao jackets. Thank goodness that's not the case.

 

s-a

 

I'd like a Mao jacket, but they are way too expensive in the local boutique.

 

The so called upgrade to the M240: It is pure cosmetics but doesn't make the camera more useful. I think, you can give the camera an eight year old girl with a bunch of acrylic pens. Then you get a nice camera back for free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't do if

 

(new) M-P - (2nd hand sale) M240 <= (upgrade) M240->M-P - (diff factor uM-P vs real M-P) £500

 

BTW I found this diff factor between the second hand price of the real M9 and uM9-P despite in that case no difference in functionality whereas there will be here

Link to post
Share on other sites

If everything had to be shoved through a Utilitarian Calculus to be justified we'd all be wearing Mao jackets. Thank goodness that's not the case.

 

s-a

Gees I hated calculus and that was in 1968. Still do....:D

I will keep my out of date 240 just like it is...:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really split. I guess it depends on the cost, but there's no real photographic impact which is sort of why I wouldn't sell my M240 to upgrade. I just wish they'd do these at the beginning of the product line rather than late in the cycle.

 

It's called marketing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...