lct Posted April 8, 2014 Share #21 Posted April 8, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I would not mind having a Nex-like T if it makes better images with M lenses. Remains to see how better the EVF will be compared to that of the M240 though. Could be interesting if it works with the latter as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 8, 2014 Posted April 8, 2014 Hi lct, Take a look here The leak. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rosuna Posted April 8, 2014 Share #22 Posted April 8, 2014 I would not mind having a Nex-like T if it makes better images with M lenses. Remains to see how better the EVF will be compared to that of the M240 though. Could be interesting if it works with the latter as well. The key is in the lenses: if the lenses are as good as the X-Vario zoom... then... this new system will be an object of desire! (A simple body made of metal with simple interface and tactile quality may be more than sufficient...). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sc_rufctr Posted April 9, 2014 Share #23 Posted April 9, 2014 I like it. It's different and I'd be willing to bet it will perform very well. One big plus. It's compact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted April 15, 2014 Share #24 Posted April 15, 2014 That rumour site touts the T as having WiFi but if the body is an aluminium shell it will act like a Faraday Cage so it's unlikely to have very effective WiFi propagation, if at all. Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted April 15, 2014 Share #25 Posted April 15, 2014 That rumour site touts the T as having WiFi but if the body is an aluminium shell it will act like a Faraday Cage so it's unlikely to have very effective WiFi propagation, if at all. Like unibody Macbooks have no effective WiFi propagation? (Sent from my unibody MBP via WiFi.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted April 15, 2014 Share #26 Posted April 15, 2014 Like unibody Macbooks have no effective WiFi propagation? (Sent from my unibody MBP via WiFi.) Thanks for the unnecessary sarcasm, Michael. You might be right but the MBP is a clam shell design that when open provides plenty of opportunity for rf propagation through the keyboard and screen whereas rf would need to enter the T (if the rumoured design of a solid Al body is correct) through the relatively small LCD or the lens, which will undoubtedly comprise a number of thick glass elements that will inhibit rf. Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.