lct Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1301 Posted June 9, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Makes little sense to compare M to SL bodies indeed. What some people would like is a rangefinder w/o the drawbacks of optical rangefinders. Not including me i must say but i would be interested in a digital rangefinder if it is possible to make one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Hi lct, Take a look here What do you want in the next digital M?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
cirke Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1302 Posted June 9, 2016 Makes little sense to compare M to SL bodies indeed. What some people would like is a rangefinder w/o the drawbacks of optical rangefinders. Not including me i must say but i would be interested in a digital rangefinder if it is possible to make one. same here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1303 Posted June 9, 2016 Makes little sense to compare M to SL bodies indeed. What some people would like is a rangefinder w/o the drawbacks of optical rangefinders. Not including me i must say but i would be interested in a digital rangefinder if it is possible to make one. It is not really comparing, it is looking for alternatives if a system shows serious drawbacks for the use one intends it for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1304 Posted June 9, 2016 It is not really comparing [...] Really? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/215101-what-do-you-want-in-the-next-digital-m/?do=findComment&comment=3059017'>More sharing options...
jmahto Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1305 Posted June 9, 2016 Really? So we all want a no compromise AF 50mm lens as the same size of MF 50mm lux ?? While we are dreaming, why not wish for a pancake as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cirke Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1306 Posted June 9, 2016 So we all want a no compromise AF 50mm lens as the same size of MF 50mm lux ?? No it can be bigger , but a Canon 50 1.4 is not very big Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1307 Posted June 9, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Really? Yes. Now put that Summilux on the SL... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmahto Posted June 9, 2016 Share #1308 Posted June 9, 2016 No it can be bigger , but a Canon 50 1.4 is not very big Are you referring to this Canon lens to compare with Leica 50mm 1.4? http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/12140-USA/Canon_2515A003_50mm_f_1_4_USM_Autofocus.html I cry foul... Seriously I would like to know whether they are equivalent in your usage? (I know that in my usage they are not comparable). If they are not equivalent in your usage then the comparison is moot. Engineering design is all about compromises.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cirke Posted June 10, 2016 Share #1309 Posted June 10, 2016 No rumors at all on a new M ?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicaiste Posted June 12, 2016 Share #1310 Posted June 12, 2016 Now that the SL has replaced my M240 as my M camera for some time, I realized that what is missing for me on all M cameras is a great in camera diopter adjustment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.