Jump to content

The Sony A7 thread [Merged]


dmclalla

Recommended Posts

x
  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest polygamer
i've read something about problems with reflection from the sensor surface to the backside of the lens and back - could that be the problem they were talking about?

Hi, there are threads on internal sensor mirroring in the SONY A7/A7R.

 

So, this can happen, and one should not be disappointed, even if a modern Leica lens

with new design is used ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

Hi, the picture with the 3,8/24 ASPH was taken with the camera held in a natural position.

 

With the Heliar 4,5/15 picture below I had to hold it at an angle showing the candles at the upper border of the frame.

 

I find this rather strange, because the Heliar has the reputation of being difficult on the M9,

and on the NEXen with pink corners. I would have expectes all sorts of funny effects.

 

So, we have to rely on trial and error (or the camera systems from the manufacturers) ...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

Hi, flares with the SONY A7 and the ZEISS Biogon 4,5/21, f4,5, and pink in the lower middle, despite the app ...:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, flares with the SONY A7 and the ZEISS Biogon 4,5/21, f4,5, and pink in the lower middle, despite the app ...:

 

Hr. Polygamer,

 

SAR reported that SONY will update software for A7/A7R on 19, March. One of them is the "smooth reflection" app.

 

I'm not sure wether it can solve the flare problem. You may evaluate its performance when available.

 

Greuss!

 

Thomas Chen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thank for the information, Thomas.

 

We shall see what the new app does, and what its side effects are ...

 

I am presently thinking about what the corner softness of the SONY A7 with Leica M

mount lenses does to landscape pictures.

 

A little softness might translate into large blurry areas.

 

I would not like to fall behind what I can do with the M9 (first picture) or NEX-6.

 

But in a couple of days I shall be in the mountains to find out.

 

Viele Grüße, and have a nice weekend, Immo!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

Hi, when using Leica lenses with the SONY A7/A7R one can see corner softness with wide apertures.

 

To show what we are talking about, two decorated windows (sorry, some people like brick walls better;)).

 

SONY A7, first ZEISS Biogon 2/35, then Voigtländer Ultron 2/40, Nikon mount.

 

I took these, because my Leica Summicron 2/35 is from 1988.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

Hi, and now let's look in the upper right corner, both lenses fully open:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

So, this can happen, when using Leica M mount lenses with the SONY A7.

 

I did not post the pictures to spoil the SONY party.

 

But they might prevent some disappointment.

 

Our Leica lenses may perform dramatically better than the ZEISS, let us hope ...;)

 

Maybe, I should try my Summicron 2/35 V4 ---

Link to post
Share on other sites

An extraordinary amount of experience here with A7/A7R. I am about to purchase a Sony for use with my limited collection of R glass (19/2.8 V2, 35-70/4, 80-200/4). I am leaning toward the 7 for electronic first curtain and also because I think 24MP should be plenty. My concern with 7R is shutter vibration, although I haven't finalized my decision :confused:. Any comments on pros/cons of 7 vs 7R would be very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

Maybe, I should try my Summicron 2/35 V4 ---

Hi, returning to the topic of SONY softness in corners with Leica M mount lenses

I found something in my files with the Leica Elmarit 2,8/28 ASPH on the A7

(Sorry, no brick walls;)).

 

First the decorated window f8:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

And now the crops f 2,8; 4; 5,6; 8:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer

So, this is an example of what one can expect from a modern Leica WA.

 

F8 I find satisfactory. The problem with Leica M mount lenses on the A7 is,

that results are unpredictable.

 

Hopeless cases on the M9 or NEX-6 work nicely with the app,

former favourites on both like the ZEISS Biogon above, show

poor results wide open.

 

The only good thing that can be said about the unpredictable performance

of Leica M mount lenses on the A7 is:

 

Since I have the A7, I have not bought any lens!

 

Hassle-free adaptation of Leica M mount lenses can be had for little money

with the SONY NEX-6.

 

I have (presently only) one ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two questions spring to mind, is that performance any worse than it does on the M9 or M240? And is the edge performance better at the larger apertures on the Nex 6?

I dont have that lens, 28 is not a field of view I like much but I do have a 28/1.9 Ultron.

Thanks for all your work!

 

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest polygamer
Two questions spring to mind,

1. is that performance any worse than it does on the M9 or M240?

2.And is the edge performance better at the larger apertures on the Nex 6?

Hi, I inserted numbers in your reply:

 

ad 1. Yes, I think so. However, I do not have direct comparisons, because I normally

put only one camera in my pocket and I hate changing lenses in the open.

 

But the window is quite close to where I normally park my car, so I could

take two cameras with me, and change optics inside the car.

 

ad 2. Yes, with the lenses I have, I would say so. A direct comparison is difficult, again.

 

I do not have exactly comparable lenses, if I take the ZEISS Biogon 2/35 on the NEX-6 and the ZEISS Planar 2/50,

I have focal length equality (due to the crop factor of the NEX-6), but different lens

performance characteristics.

 

But this worth a try ...

 

On the other hand, I know that the difficulties turn up with WA lenses.

 

The Planar works beautifully on the A7, even wide open.

 

So, I should use the 35mm ZEISS on the A7, and the ZEISS 2,8/25 on the NEX-6,

this comes close.

 

I must think a little about what to take ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...