Jump to content
dmclalla

The Sony A7 thread [Merged]

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

According to Sonyalpharumors website the NEX-FF photocamera project will come within 2 months.

In light of the quality expressed by the Sony RX1®, is there a possibility that - from a technical perspective - the new NEX-FF will impact on Leica affecting the new M240 in terms of overall image quality and sales (being offered at a more affordable price)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether Sony even wishes to deal with Leica wideangle lenses remains to be seen. They prefer to sell their own

I have no complaint about delivery (five weeks), and others around me are reporting Ms arriving that were ordered sometime this spring. There is quite some movement in the "deliveries" thread too.

It appears we are entering a post-glacial era now

Edited by jaapv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wheter Sony even wishes to deal with Leica wideangle lenses remains to be seen. They prefer to sell their own

I have no complaint about delivery (five weeks), and others around me are reporting Ms arriving that were ordered sometime this spring. There is quite some movement in the "deliveries" thread too.

It appears we are entering a post-glacial era now

 

It's evident, from the lack of bitching and moaning on this forum, that the things are arriving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Sony is in no better position to deal with the inevitable Italian flag issues than Leica is, and they have less incentive to try. Why would Sony care whether you could use third-party lenses?

 

Also it is still a rumour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
According to Sonyalpharumors website the NEX-FF photocamera project will come within 2 months.

In light of the quality expressed by the Sony RX1®, is there a possibility that - from a technical perspective - the new NEX-FF will impact on Leica affecting the new M240 in terms of overall image quality and sales (being offered at a more affordable price)?

 

I ordered the M one day after announcement and still do not see the light at the end of the tunnel. If my M is not delivered before NEX FF becomes available, I will be certainly interested in its performance with Leica lenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sony is in no better position to deal with the inevitable Italian flag issues than Leica is, and they have less incentive to try. Why would Sony care whether you could use third-party lenses?

 

Also it is still a rumour.

 

The point I was making Michael is that with some proper competition, Leica might care about releasing a camera with Italian flag issues, especially if a competitor had them sorted.

 

I agree that Sony is unlikely to offer serious competition for Leica, too much engineering work when the lens business is not theirs and too much of a niche market for a company making thousands of cameras a day, not tens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It appears we are entering a post-glacial era now

 

Yes, it does appear that whatever it was causing them to drag their feet is now fixed so maybe lead times will improve. Either that, or they've sub-contracted the work out to Panasonic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sony is in no better position to deal with the inevitable Italian flag issues than Leica is, and they have less incentive to try. Why would Sony care whether you could use third-party lenses?

 

Also it is still a rumour.

 

Very simple, it opens an entirely new market and vastly broadens the potential customer base. If you need further proof you need look no further than Ricoh's GRX A12 module. The Japanese camera companies know who owns Leica glass, and it's a perfect target demographic for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not be so quick to pooh pooh a Sony FF Nex. Even if it had issues with Leica wide angles it could present an interesting choice as a backup to a M9 or M(240). For some people it could be a substitute -- assuming of course that an EVF was acceptable vs. RF. Sony makes some of the best sensors out there, and the RX1 shows it can get down to 35mm. Surely Sony will seek to improve on that.

I for one would consider a FF Sony as a backup and/or for use with longer lenses or in an emergency, wides. I would not consider it a substitute as I prefer the optical rangefinder for focusing. But for a backup, I have not been happy with the less than FF alternatives so I am eager to see whether Sony can pull it off, if for no other reason to see Leica pushed by competition. The technology competition is benefiting us consumers and the more the better.

Edited by WeinschelA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sony is in no better position to deal with the inevitable Italian flag issues than Leica is, and they have less incentive to try. Why would Sony care whether you could use third-party lenses?

 

Also it is still a rumour.

 

This problem is not specific to Leica lenses, they may need to resolve it for their own (and Zeiss) lenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest borge

I think this could be a very good thing, if the rumor is true.

The sensor from the RX1R is superb. You can actually use it to make great B&W images at 25600 ISO without any visible banding. Basically you don't ever have to think about "ISO" again. Just shoot.

 

Wether they want to correct for M-mount wide-angles or not: I don't care. As long as it performs nicely with 35mm+ M-mount lenses I would purchase it in a heartbeat if it actually performed nicely with M-mount lenses. It would have been a great companion to my MM as a new M240 is just too expensive to purchase and own alongside the MM for the occasional color shot.

 

Sony could charge what they charge for the RX1R minus the lens and they would make a lot of money on it, and my guess is that it would sell like hot-cakes.

 

That's all considering if it performs well with M-lenses and if this rumor is true at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This problem is not specific to Leica lenses, they may need to resolve it for their own (and Zeiss) lenses.

Normally when you design a camera system you would make sure there isn’t an issue in the first place. That is you would design the mount so it could accommodate near telecentric lenses that don’t have this issue. Only the E-mount is too small for that if you have to deal with a 43 mm image circle. Just take a look at the image on the sonyalpharumors.com site: (SR4) UPDATED: FF-NEX coming soon? Stay tuned on SAR!!! | sonyalpharumors. That is not at all what I want to see when looking through the mount of a modern system camera. Either the sensor would need to be smaller (as so far it is in the Nex system) or the throat diameter be bigger.

 

If I were Sony I wouldn’t build this camera. A new FF system would be a different matter, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This problem is not specific to Leica lenses, they may need to resolve it for their own (and Zeiss) lenses.

Yes, but their solution wil likely not work for Leica (and Zeiss ZM) lenses; they can design their own lenses to avoid the problem on their own sensor- it is ja matter of choosing specific compromises when designing the whole system.

And, of course, commission Zeiss to make a premium series of NEX lenses.

 

Edit: As Michael explains, it will be bit of a challenge. They might run into a choice between overall lens quality like vignetting and CA vs telecentricity.

Edited by jaapv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very simple, it opens an entirely new market and vastly broadens the potential customer base.

Sony has been going through some difficult times recently, but surely they are not that desperate that they saw going after the Leica M market as vastly (!) broadening their customer base. I would think they are after bigger fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is not at all what I want to see when looking through the mount of a modern system camera. Either the sensor would need to be smaller (as so far it is in the Nex system) or the throat diameter be bigger.

 

If I were Sony I wouldn’t build this camera. A new FF system would be a different matter, of course.

 

I think this is nothing more than a bit of photoshop hyperbole on the part of SonyAlpha Rumors. My guess is that the only thing a full frame NEX would have in common with the E mount predecessors would be the name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By nihilisation
      Hello everyone, 
      I just spotted some white particles on the far edge/periphery of one of the lens element of my summarit 75 2.5 .
      I bought this lens used two months ago and at the time I could not see anything. I cannot say 100% but I suspect those particles were not present.
      They are hard to perceived. I only spotted them while taking pictures of my first born this morning when I was about to fit the cap onto the lens and had a look at inside.
      The sun was very bright and I could perfectly see them, them were almost shining like crystals ??
      Pictures are not affected at all and I am only worried for the case of a fungus. I do not care about dust, but this is the first time I see something like this, hence me asking for your help/advises.
      Because they are on the far periphery of the lens element they are hard to picture. For the pictures below I had to flash the front element with a led light and it creates some ghosts/artefacts.
      For instance you can see that this "line" of particles appears twice, mirroring itself onto the next lens element. They only appear on one side of the lens and I also pictured the other "clean" side as a reference. 
      Pictures are not great but this is what I have for now. 
      I Thank you for input and wish you a pleasant week,
      Best,
      Fabien
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By leicand
      I owe to Leica the opportunity of this image. In fact, a couple of days ago, the Leica Store of Rome, Via dei Due Macelli, gave me a Leica S with a 30-90 lens, for me to have fun for an hour. It was about sunset. So, I climbed up the Spanish Steps, and also the stairs of the Church of "Trinità dei Monti". And then, I waited ... As I was pointing at the shadow of the balustrade of the stairs and of myself taking the photo, a couple climbing the stairs of the Church entered my viewfinder. It was easy, then, to seize the moment.
    • By robsonj
      - Leica M Typ 240
      - Screen protector (already on the camera, the protector has some surface scratches)
      - ThumbsUp grip
      - Leather case (unused)
      - Olympus EVF2 (logo removed, see pic)
      - RRS M240 L Bracket
      - Battery
      - Battery Charger
      - Neck strap (unused)
      - Original packaging and documents
      Everything is in fully working condition. As you can see there is some brassing on the body. The EVF2 I purchased used, the previous owner had removed the Olympus logo. The EVF works perfectly, though I didn't use it very much. The base plate is in excellent condition, it along with the leather case have been stored in the original packaging unused, I used the RRS baseplate on the camera.
      Price includes PayPal fees and insured shipping via FedEx to CONUS.
      Shutter count is hard to know, from the numbering of my dog files I'd say its in the 5000-10000 range.
      Happy to take additional photos and answer any questions.
      I have many sample shots taken with this camera on my Flickr feed for reference... https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=26449190%40N00&sort=date-taken-desc&view_all=1&text=Leica M 240
    • By Winfoto
      Leica Q, neuwertig, inclusive Original-Verpackung zu verkaufen.

    • By tom0511
      Aufgrund Umstieg auf SL2 biete ich hier an:
      Leica SL Gehäuse
      sehr guter Zustand, nur privat und sehr wenig genutzt Es war von Anfang an ein Displayschutzfolie auf dem Display mit allem Originalzubehör und Originalverpackung gekauft im deutschen Fachhandel (Fotogena, Worms) Die Kamera kann auch bei mir in Bensheim nach Absprache gerne besichtigt werden. Fragen bitte gerne stellen.
      Am liebsten wäre mir Abholung gegen Barzahlung. Versand bei Vorkasse wäre auch möglich. 
      Bei Paypal müssten wir über die Gebühren reden.
      Wer nicht die 47MP der SL2 braucht, kommt hier zu einem sehr günstigen Preis den Einstieg in das SL System. Die Flexibilität - SL Objektive, M-Objektive, Voigtländer, Nikon etc., der tolle Sucher und die Leica Bildqualität und Bedienphilosophie machen für mich die SL/SL2 zu einer der universellsten Kameras, die man heute kaufen kann.
×
×
  • Create New...