Jump to content

The Sony A7 thread [Merged]


dmclalla

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

An elegant and secure way to drive the corner smearing created by A7R+Leica WA lenses out of your computer monitor. Could be useful for landscape phtography.

 

1. Set the aspect ration from 3:2 to 16:9

2. Send the files to Apple McPro Retina or other computers with monitor (mostly 16:9 ratio).

3. Save the chore of cropping in PP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
An elegant and secure way to drive the corner smearing created by A7R+Leica WA lenses out of your computer monitor. Could be useful for landscape phtography.

 

1. Set the aspect ration from 3:2 to 16:9

2. Send the files to Apple McPro Retina or other computers with monitor (mostly 16:9 ratio).

3. Save the chore of cropping in PP.

 

Then why have a full frame sensor when you can't use the whole thing? The A7/r will be just fine if you can be satisfied using FE lenses. However, tell me if I'm wrong, I don't see any faster than f/1.8 on the their lens "dream" map and the three they do have are large in comparison to what Leica offers in the same focal length.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then why have a full frame sensor when you can't use the whole thing? The A7/r will be just fine if you can be satisfied using FE lenses. However, tell me if I'm wrong, I don't see any faster than f/1.8 on the their lens "dream" map and the three they do have are large in comparison to what Leica offers in the same focal length.

 

I agree with you that Leica M camera is best for Leica M lenses.

 

A7R and its successor too will have their places in the history of camera development.

 

After one week's hard working I realize that the team combining Leica lenses with A7R will work best taking A7R as a tripod camera, no matter R lenses or M lenses.

 

A7R is really a R solution, hand-held (within my R collection) or sitting on a tripod.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does like a tripod. Weird isn't it, I can handhold the M9 down to a fraction of the lens length but not the A7r. Is it just the resolution or shutter speed and body weight/design? I wonder.

 

Still it takes away a stop or two of high iso advantage and the sony likes to be above base iso in London where light is rationed very carefully throughout the winter months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember that a camera store owner told me not to get the 800, even though he sold it, because so many of the early adapting pros were having big problems focusing it with the high MP count he surmised.

 

That thought stuck with me when ordering the a7R and I am pretty much convinced it will be mostly if not entirely a tripod mounted camera. I will be mostly using my R glass (and maybe a few M lenses) where I can use 15, 21-35, 35-70, 24-90, 60, 80, 180 and long R zoom lenses. In this way splitting off R duties to the a7r will keep some dust from entering the M240 where I tend to go for the majority of my landscape shooting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you able to post to this thread? Smoke signals? ;)

...well, not with an M9, :rolleyes:

it was in the context of taking photos, and not worrying about which new gadget will work with my M lenses.:confused:

Although come to think of it, the Android thingy I often use for this forum has a 13mp camera built in......, but unlike the M9 its cheap enough to be 'disposable' when its obsolete.

 

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

In one sentence: "I bought one on Monday, and sent it back today."

 

"Two Days with a Sony A7r!

I bought one on Monday, and sent it back today. Martin asked what I felt on a picture, but I thought it might be easier with a separate post. Remember, this is just my grumpy old man opinion, everyone else seems to think it's the dog's doodahs!

 

I tested the A7r with the 28'cron, 35FLE and the 50 'lux and the WATE. They were all lovely and sharp in the middle, the 50 lux was slightly compromised in the corners wide open, the 35 FLE more so and the 28 'cron really unusable. The WATE was pretty good. The 60mm macro elmar R was great.

I was expecting vignetting. I wasn't expecting the smearing.

When it was good it was very very good, and when it was bad it was horrid.

The camera itself was great to use, the EVF excellent and the shutter made a rather pleasant but very loud KerChunk noise.

I didn't try any 'native' lenses (because none were available). There should be 4 by the end of Jan (35 f2.8, 55 f2.8, 24-70 f4 and kit zoom). 4 lenses does not a system make.

 

Basically, I thought it would be good with M lenses now, and others later, but it was just too much of a compromise.

 

I felt that the extra resolution would only be visible on 36" prints, and even then only looking at them from a foot away. So, for me at least, no deal" ...copied from Facebook.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does like a tripod. Weird isn't it, I can handhold the M9 down to a fraction of the lens length but not the A7r. Is it just the resolution or shutter speed and body weight/design? I wonder.

 

Still it takes away a stop or two of high iso advantage and the sony likes to be above base iso in London where light is rationed very carefully throughout the winter months.

 

I bet its the shutter that's not allowing you to shoot like you do your Leica.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noct 0.95 @ iso 1000 on A7r

 

Not bad ....... possibly some edge smearing on other images but hard to be sure. WB, colours and exposure all spot on, but you need focus magnification under about f4 to be sure to hit focus. I will have a day tomorrow to take a good range of images .... plus ....

 

FE 35/2.8 arrives ....

 

Unless the performance is stupendous with a native FE W/A lens I cannot justify keeping this camera ....

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malland

Am more interested in commenting on the dog than the camera: Picture 1: the hell with cameras, it's the dog that has the soul; and Picture 2: a wet nose that only a "mother" could love.

 

EDIT: in keeping with the ethos of this forum: "if you fell you need a friend, get a dog." :D

 

—Mitch/Chiang Mai

Looking for Baudelaire [WIP]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know as I don't have the M240 but the M-E. I too have no issues hand holding at slow shutter speeds.

 

In the M6 era I can shoot at 1/4 second hand held if put camera against a pillar or wall.

 

For a M digital camera, the metal shutter virates bit much if compared to the rubberized cloth shutter on M6 or MP. No more such slow shutter speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...