Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trying a new to me scanner, flatbed Epson style, and it's taking shape, but heaps to learn.

A couple of old 500C/M 80 Planar shots.

Agfa 100RS.

Gary

 

And another.

Bush work is either THE most dangerous, or if not, very close to being the most dangerous occupation in NZ.

Gary

Gary it's fine and nice

You highlight NZ by these pictures

Do you try to scan with original Epson softaware for comparison ?

Thanks for posting

Best

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another one from the same series.  It's a Leica IIIf with a 50mm Summicron collapsible on Portra 400 film.  It was f5.6, probably about 1/100th of a second, with the face on Zone VI.  Scanned.  It might be that the main distinctive aspect of the picture has more to do with the lens than whether it's film or digital.  And with this lens it seems to work better close, as opposed to landscapes, where it's pretty ordinary.  Up close, though, it's, well, I've never seen anything like it.  It looks much better at higher resolution than is allowed in these posts.

 

attachicon.gifRoll 2324 S22 med.jpg

Fin ,  I like much your portraits in color

Skin is beautiful and color is natural

Best

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Big Wheel on Thames

London

 

 

Kodak Portra 400

Leica M7

28 Summicron Asph

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

In comparison with digital for color and softness of the picture , it's without appeal ! :)

 

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Velvia 50


SWC


Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!


  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another one from the same series.  It's a Leica IIIf with a 50mm Summicron collapsible on Portra 400 film.  It was f5.6, probably about 1/100th of a second, with the face on Zone VI.  Scanned.  It might be that the main distinctive aspect of the picture has more to do with the lens than whether it's film or digital.  And with this lens it seems to work better close, as opposed to landscapes, where it's pretty ordinary.  Up close, though, it's, well, I've never seen anything like it.  It looks much better at higher resolution than is allowed in these posts.

 

attachicon.gifRoll 2324 S22 med.jpg

Very nice shot, Finarphin.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...