Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why?

 

My suspicion would be smearing affect with the EVF particularly if hand held due to any movement. It may be possible if the M240 was supported on a monopod or a tripod. But, focus may be an issue since you can not focus with the EVF except in the center and since the camera/EVF does not offer any scrolling.

 

Rich

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any fast moving photography (music, motorsport etc) is not easy. In this image, I shot this at 1/180th at F4 on ISO400 (-1.5EV). Nowadays, I tend to shoot gigs with my 180/2 cron. This is done at ISO400 often at 1/60th - 1/90th sec hand held. You cannot use monopods/tripods or flash for gigs.

 

Ergonomically the DMR is great for shooting with long lenses. The Billy Joel shot is a very slightly cropped (only to make it almost square) portrait image. The DMR base is shaped like a grip and it has an extra shutter button on the base. The EVFs just don’t refresh quickly enough to enable you to catch that fleeting split second.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Stunning bird and shot!

Where did you put your focus?

 

The M240 has a 10X magnification and focus aid was used to determine the focus on the bird's head, beak to determine precise focus before shutter was released.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love the M240 to be a proper R solution. But it isn’t a total solution. Sure, if something is going to stay still for a few moments while you dial in the mag on the EVF - fine. But there’s still bird shooting and moving bird shooting.

 

10MP on the DMR works fine with its 16 bit colour depth. I print my DMR images regularly to A2 size on my Epson 3800. I’m not saying the DMR is perfect, as it’s crippled by its limited ISO range (as well as the battery and spare parts issues). But the M240 is too clumsy for some shooters.

 

I’m not saying that I don’t like Ms either. I have a M9, M6TTL and a M2 (my favourite). It’s just that they are different tools.

 

Iceland - Puffins 2006 R9/DMR 80-200/4 ROM

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

M240 can never be a choice tool for chasing fast moving objects. Cannon and Nikon DSLRs with fast autofocus are the right tools.

 

It is like comparing a MB SL to a 911 C2 although the price range is comparable. There is no distinct winner as both have different merits and appeal to different driver / owner desire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you said that my M240 is only good for capturing stationary objects, consider this:

 

9183404280_23319f5509_b.jpg

L1007457-1 by sillbeers15

I caught a baby humming bird, shocked it to stay stationary to attract the mother bird to return for another stationary pose ;P

 

9181187539_f06a95c250_b.jpg

L1007470-1 by sillbeers15

Surely the mother bird returned to pose stationary for my slow M240 to finally take a snapshot successfully.

Edited by sillbeers15
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

A Weaverbird, I think, There are many variants and morphs, so not too easy. If this one was shot in South Africa I would say Cape Weaver.

(image source: Piket-Bo-Berg)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by jaapv
Link to post
Share on other sites

These are Humming birds variant commonly found in South East Asia. These birds feed on bougainvillea flowers. These birds come into my yard for feeding every evening before sunset at fixed locations. These shots were taken just 2 to 2.5M in focal length as I hide comfortably behind a window indoors.

 

The lifesize birds in my images do not exceed 8cm in length (adult;from beak to tail end) and it has a distinctive long sharp downwards curved beak. The bougainvillea flowers and branches will be a good source of reference for the size of the birds in the images.

 

First image shows a male bird,

2nd image is a baby bird and the third image has the baby and a mother bird captured in a split second feeding moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hummingbirds are members of the family Trochilidae and are found only in the Americas. Your birds may be occupying a similar ecological niche but they are not hummingbirds. These three birds are, in order, Costa's Hummingbird, Rufous Hummingbird, and probably Calliope Hummingbird.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies for mistaking what I've shot as Humming bird as the shape, size and nectar feeding habits are similar to one.

 

I'm no bird expert. So I have to admit my mistake. After doing some research, The birds I've caught on images are actually a variant of Sunbird. The Sunbird is also distantly related to Humming bird according to Wikipedia information.

Edited by sillbeers15
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...