Jump to content

Zeiss Ikon is no more


stunsworth

Recommended Posts

From Zeiss' annual report of 13.12.2012

The Camera Lenses, Sports Optics and Planetariums divisions together generated revenue of EUR 178 million, a rise of 11 percent on a year-on-year basis (prior year*: EUR 160 million).

No mention of the camera division, and for a good reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

End of the Road: Zeiss Ikon Rangefinders To Be Shuttered

 

I don't think I ever saw one, but it must have been difficult competing against the used Leica market.

 

I think part of the problem is competing with Leica and Voigtlander. Too expensive to compete with Voigtlander, doesn't have the build quality and reputation to compete with Leica. I do have a silver Ikon and I really enjoy it. A bit thinner and lighter than my Leica and durable enough for my needs, but still I hate to see them go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this leaves Leica as the last maker of 35 mm film cameras. Obviously, Zeiss wants to spare the effort of developing a digital Ikon, which probably would sell at lower run rates and prices than the digital Leicas.

 

The situation is certainly different in the lens market. Thinking about it, a Biogon 1.4/35 could be an interesting alternative to the 35 Summilux.

 

Stefan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this leaves Leica as the last maker of 35 mm film cameras.....snip

 

No, there are still the Voigtlanders, and I think Nikon still lists the F6 at least. The nooks and crannies of Photokina might have yielded one or two others.

 

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, there are still the Voigtlanders, and I think Nikon still lists the F6 at least. The nooks and crannies of Photokina might have yielded one or two others.

 

Gerry

 

Actually Nikon list two 35mm SLRs on their website. Then there are the various 'Lomo' type cameras too, but it's always a shame to see another one go.

 

However, how many members here bought a Zeiss body?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this leaves Leica as the last maker of 35 mm film cameras...

 

As James says, there are plenty of camera manufacturers still producing film models in different corners of the world - Lomo is constantly introducing them to a wider audience. And the supply of reliable used film cameras will always make it difficult for products like the Ikon: how can such a high-end model compete against a 50-year old M2 that's still going strong?

 

I only ever saw one Ikon 'in the flesh' - on the shelf of Copenhagen's premier camera shop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From Zeiss' annual report of 13.12.2012

 

No mention of the camera division, and for a good reason.

 

Well, the main reason for not mentioning it, is that Zeiss doesn't have a "Camera division". The late Zeiss Ikon bodies were produced by Cosina which used the Zeiss name and its revenues for distributing the camera. Zeiss doesn't produce cameras any more since 1972.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this leaves Leica as the last maker of 35 mm film cameras. Obviously, Zeiss wants to spare the effort of developing a digital Ikon, which probably would sell at lower run rates and prices than the digital Leicas.

 

The situation is certainly different in the lens market. Thinking about it, a Biogon 1.4/35 could be an interesting alternative to the 35 Summilux.

 

Stefan

Stefan, Cosina is still producing the Voigtlander branded M mount film cameras as far as I know.

I guess that you already know that Cosina manufactured those Zeiss Ikons and most of the ZM lens range too? The couple of ZM lenses actually made by Zeiss are unsurprisingly priced similarly to the Leica M lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...