Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi

Was just reviewing some M9 images which had exposure times of 2 seconds. Tripod, of course.

Subject matter is moving water.

When looking at the images it is clear that details such as bubbles and foam is not being

recorded as one continuous blur but rather 4 'pulses' where one can see the defined moving objects

recorded four times.

Would this be regarded as a normal process where a sensor is recording once every 1/2 second

in this particular case or could this be regarded as some sort of timing/writing inaccuracy?

 

Thx for looking

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's definitely not normal - I've done a lot of long exposure work with my M9, including moving water, and never seen this.

 

I don't think the CCD has the capability to do electronic shuttering, or multiple readout, so I can't imagine it can be that.

 

- Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be an actual physical effect

Sounds right to me. Easy to test - drop a white object in front of the camera on a similar shutter speed (paper or something light). I'll bet you just get a single blur and that your posted pic is an anomaly due to uneven water motion:).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Everybody,

 

Is it possible that these are ghosts from the flash or fill flash of ANOTHER nearby camera or flash?

 

Perhaps a camera that allows flash at higher shutter speeds by repetitvely flashing an electronic flash as the shutter curtain sweeps across the image plane.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Edited by Michael Geschlecht
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely not flash or other artificial light source related.

 

When I get home this evening, i'll try to source additional files from other cameras that I have shot

this particular scene over the years.

Other images in the same sequence with the M9 had similar characteristics so not a one off

write issue (if it is,even, an issue at all)

The M9 used was a reps loaner so can't replicate a situation with the specific camera.

 

The water,bubbles and foam in the original crop were travelling counter clockwise.

There is a small waterfall out of frame on the left and the area photographed in the crop was a

detail of a small whirlpool out of the main current

 

I have attached an additional file taken two summers ago with an S2 of the same whirlpool

File had exposure time of 8 seconds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...