Jump to content

Exercise in industrial design


adan

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

We'll see just how close I got in 8 weeks:

 

Of course, anyone can sketch out an idea for anything. However, here's what I came up with TWO YEARS before Leica announced the creation of the 75mm APO (note date on original posting).

 

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=004jpi

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Detail of top plate: exposure compensation, framing rate, shots remaining

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Battery compartment in bottom...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi Andy,

I really like your ideas and presentation. I would move the tab for the EV to the front for index finger access, similar to the meter mode adjustment on the R bodies. Also it would be nice if the shutter speed dial had a raised knurled rim for the same reason (also from the R bodies). If they have a one button easy custom WB, yuo'll need to add a button somewhere. I wonder if Leica will follow their tactile control identification and make the buttons feel differently. It will be fun to see how close you got.

Oh, and I agree that Airfix make a good kit.

Bob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob: Overhanging EV lever on the front is a good idea, although some may prefer adjustment via the shutter itself. Can't please everyone, I guess. Probably should have a lock button as well.

 

My Sony R1, which has no analog shutter/aperture controls (bleaahh!), does at least link EV +/- control to the vertical thumbwheel on the back, which makes it the most accesible and easiest-to-use EV control I've run across.

 

Steve - what I REALLY left out, I just noticed, is the AUTO setting on the shutter dial (double do-ooh!). Ah, well - at least I don't have to go back and retrofit 5,000 cameras!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chris_h

"My Sony R1, which has no analog shutter/aperture controls (bleaahh!), does at least link EV +/- control to the vertical thumbwheel on the back, which makes it the most accesible and easiest-to-use EV control I've run across."

 

 

Is this not the normal way to do design, to build cameras today ...?! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting! I wonder how many Leica people are choking on their cornflakes this morning.... Sadly no viewfinder magnification lever though!

 

C'mon Andy, how about a front view, without lens mounted? The metering pattern, the lens coding sensor, the red dot, the name, the viewfinder windows, any levers on the camera front?

 

Perhaps you should post over on rangefinderforum.com, we know Dr Andreas Kaufmann keeps an eye on that board!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob: Overhanging EV lever on the front is a good idea, although some may prefer adjustment via the shutter itself. Can't please everyone, I guess. Probably should have a lock button as well.

 

My Sony R1, which has no analog shutter/aperture controls (bleaahh!), does at least link EV +/- control to the vertical thumbwheel on the back, which makes it the most accesible and easiest-to-use EV control I've run across.

 

Steve - what I REALLY left out, I just noticed, is the AUTO setting on the shutter dial (double do-ooh!). Ah, well - at least I don't have to go back and retrofit 5,000 cameras!

Andy, The lock buttons on some Pro cameras can slow things down, but help keep your settings tamper proof. On the E-1, you can program one of the control dials to do EV adjustment, which I have done. Since you have left off the Auto mark, maybe your picture is the digital M6TTL....;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Mr Designer, I would have two requests (suggestions).

 

Could you make the left selector slanted like on the M7 ?

 

Also, we don't have a front view of the camera but I will assume that the ranggefinder has the same width as on other M.

Since there is no more pickup spool or mechanical hindrance, would it be feasible and benificial to widen the rangefinder and make it even more precise and easy to use ?

 

Thank You for your efforts.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

...would it be feasible and benificial to widen the rangefinder...

Beneficial yes but feasible no i'm afraid otherwise we could not use old and new M lenses with goggles like 35/2.8, 35/2, 90/4, 135/2.8... sorry.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chris_h

"Also, we don't have a front view of the camera but I will assume that the ranggefinder has the same width as on other M.

Since there is no more pickup spool or mechanical hindrance, would it be feasible and benificial to widen the rangefinder and make it even more precise and easy to use ?"

 

HÄRESIE ! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel: Goggles!!!

 

http://www.schouten-select.org/Pictures/Items_site/135mm2151846_3.jpg

 

and more goggles...

 

http://www.leica-camera.com/produkte/msystem/objektive/makro/index_e.html

 

...plus, the viewfinder/rangefinder unit contains about 100 parts. Using the same unit as in the film cameras saves on parts inventory, speeds development, and helps keep the cost and price down.

 

I'm sure Dr. Spichtig is willing to commit "heresy" if needed to save the company - but in this case using the existing RF/VF makes sense for many reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...