Jump to content

Oh boy, where wil this lead to?


RichardM8

Recommended Posts

The camera that I lust after is an updated Leica Digilux 2 or a Leica X1 that allow interchangeable lens. Currently, I still own my first serious digital camera (pansonic LC1) - every now and then, I take off the shelf- love that Summicron lens F2 to F2.4 Zoom lens.

 

Not sure that I want a rangefinder.

 

Joan

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going down the wrong track comparing the X1 and the M9, IMO.

 

They are complementary, as any smaller and larger cameras are to each other: You'll always have the X1 within reach. Diehards apart, not everyone will always be carrying an M9 or M8.

 

I don't think it's an either-or purchase. Assuming that you would buy an M9 to use with Leica lenses, the price of an X1 is a fraction of the cost of one lens.

 

However the cameras do operate very differently and, money aside, that's where there is a choice to be made.

 

http://moneycircus.blogspot.com/search/label/PHOTOGRAPHY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember, it's about the images and not the gear, and also that rangefinder photography is not for everyone. If you're not prepared to try a film camera, why not get a used M8 and a 28 Elmarit to see if you like it. It'll give you a pretty compact package and a similar FOV to the X1. If you're set on the 50 'cron (why?), then you could try a 35 Summarit for about the same price as the 28 Elamarit. It would give you something close to the 50 mm FOV. Gear lust is a vicious thing :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a professional, you will know that the image is paramount to anything else. What you achieve with your Nikons has satisfied you up to now; if you suddenly decide to go for such an expensive beast, without any prior knowledge of same, just to achieve a reduction in weight, you are asking for a serious let down, and possible disillusionment. i would suggest using a film M7 to see if you can get on with the rangefinder system. It will cost a lot less, and you will know instantly whether or not you can use it. If you don't like it, you can sell it for a little loss. And bear in mind that Digital Ms do have a reliability problem that you cannot afford as a professional. Be warned !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this thread proves the genius of leica engineering in creating the x1-- it is like a "gateway drug" the images are that good

 

I too have toyed with buying a m9 and/or an used m8 but my wife has threatened divorce if i buy any more "stuff"- so i have to wait abit.. it's not like the x1 is deficient or anything (IMHO)- but it has inspired me to do more . . . and i suspect others as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Richard, you are doomed;)

 

Being bitten by the Leica bug is a scary experience. I would consider the M8 (2nd hand) i.s.o. the M9 - main (only) disadvantage would be the limited high ISO. At last reselling with little loss would be easier if you find you don't get on with a rangefinder.

 

For me the primary Leica selling point is the optical quality of the lenses - even the old ones are phenomenal by most (modern) standards.

 

Of course there is the knowledge of knowing the M9 is there......

Link to post
Share on other sites

upon thinking of this I wonder where this will bring you ....

 

Bob from down under will advice you to buy, Wendy from Washington will advice you not to ....

 

How does your own thinking fit into this?

 

Bit of a "link-baiting" sort of request isn't it similar to Facebook 13 year frollies asking each other if they should wear pink-, or white undies to the school dance next friday......

Link to post
Share on other sites

upon thinking of this I wonder where this will bring you ....

 

Bob from down under will advice you to buy, Wendy from Washington will advice you not to ....

 

How does your own thinking fit into this?

 

Bit of a "link-baiting" sort of request isn't it similar to Facebook 13 year frollies asking each other if they should wear pink-, or white undies to the school dance next friday......

 

i thought everyone on the internet is a 13 year old girl?;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waste of time !

 

X1 is cheep, M9 is expensive, and so ?

 

VW Polo is less expensive than a RR.

 

Any way, the X1 is imo - used by a clever person - one of the best P&S camera ever made, lot better than the Canon G.

 

Bjarke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...