Ida Posted August 24, 2010 Share #1 Â Posted August 24, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi everyone! Â I own a Leica Digilux 3 and lately I have been noticing a noise even when shooting with only ISO 200, not to speak more ISO. I need the camera for work and with this amount of noise it's almost impossible to use it. Is this usual with this camera? I doubt that it was that bad when I bought it. Thoughts, anyone? Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 24, 2010 Posted August 24, 2010 Hi Ida, Take a look here Noise with Leica DIgilux 3 - What to do?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
pop Posted August 24, 2010 Share #2 Â Posted August 24, 2010 A sample of a noisy image would possibly be useful. Take a small portion of the image (no more than - say - 500 pixels on a side) at a magnification of 100%. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ida Posted August 24, 2010 Author Share #3 Â Posted August 24, 2010 here you go: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pop Posted August 24, 2010 Share #4 Â Posted August 24, 2010 The problem with this (partial) picture is not with noise. The picture is completely out of focus. I would suggest submitting a properly focused image. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ida Posted August 24, 2010 Author Share #5 Â Posted August 24, 2010 yeah, out if focus, because the focus was on something else in the photo. this was the part of the photo where you can see the noise best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zoz Posted August 24, 2010 Share #6  Posted August 24, 2010 I don´t know the Digilux but other FT Cameras and think this is normal. Noise is changing with different light situation and WB-Settings.  Use a tool like noise ninja or neat image and it will be gone... Of course You must be careful because these tools are also able to cost You a lot of detail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggurat Posted August 24, 2010 Share #7 Â Posted August 24, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi Ida, Â I use the Dig 3 with kit lens which I guess you are doing. Obviously it is not possible for me to give you a definitive answer based on one image but: Â The file looks immediately familiar noise wise, but I would not expect to see it show up so aggressively at ISO 200. This looks more like 800 or even 1600. You may also notice some banding of the noise from top to bottom and slightly slanted. If you really want to use the ISO function it helps a lot if you create a film 2 setting with maximum red suppression - and zero everything else off. Â Personally I always stick with ISO 100 - mainly because of the banding. And I have just bought the Leica 25mm f1.4 for faster work. Â Hope this helps Johnny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan01 Posted August 24, 2010 Share #8 Â Posted August 24, 2010 A few tips to reduce noise: Make sure you don't underexpose your shots. Try bracketing or shooting in manual mode with an incident meter. Shoot in low-contrast mode. Set the white balance manually instead of automatic. Basically try to get the exposure/colors correct in camera rather that recover them in post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlosecpf Posted August 25, 2010 Share #9 Â Posted August 25, 2010 I would recommend shooting RAW and using Nik's Dfine 2.0 to reduce chroma noise in the pictures. I use this with my Digilux 2 and Digilux 3 and I am pretty happy with the results! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted August 25, 2010 Share #10 Â Posted August 25, 2010 I'd just split it in LAB obliterate A and B with Gaussian recombine and live with the result. Since I dont know how big the original is I have no idea if the 'grain' is a problem or not. Depends I guess. Â [ATTACH]217722[/ATTACH] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jankap Posted August 25, 2010 Share #11 Â Posted August 25, 2010 here you go: Just a question. Your picture "example" has a format of 960 x 960 pixels. It is transported as jpg in 60 kb. In png it would take 830 kb. Is the jpg-format (not loss free) the right choice for your problem? Jan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.