V_kids Posted July 29, 2010 Share #1 Posted July 29, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Is it possible to turn off the noise reduction at M9 ? I'm using RAW format, never turn on the noise reduction. However, everytime I'm shooting more than 1 or 2 sec, the camera always do the "noise reduction" I can see it on the LCD, right after the camera finished taking the picture. Please advice me how turn off this one. Thank You Andree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 Hi V_kids, Take a look here How to turn off noise reduction ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wattsy Posted July 29, 2010 Share #2 Posted July 29, 2010 You can't turn it off (which I suspect you knew anyway). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbretteville Posted July 29, 2010 Share #3 Posted July 29, 2010 The camera 'exposes' a black frame the same exposure time as your shot and uses that to reduce static sensor noise. As watsy mentioned, it can't be disabled. The digital Ms don't use a noise smoothing algo so it actually works well. Carl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
V_kids Posted July 29, 2010 Author Share #4 Posted July 29, 2010 Ahhh...!! so that's it. Thank you for the information Really appreciate it Andree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted July 29, 2010 Share #5 Posted July 29, 2010 I think I recall that Sandy told us here that there is now some in-built noise reduction at some higher ISOs (on the M9) even for DNG files. . That is slightly different to the system mentioned here for long exposures (which could actually be at a low ISO). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted July 29, 2010 Share #6 Posted July 29, 2010 Lets not confuse Noise Reduction with Noise Filtering, two very different things. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyb Posted July 29, 2010 Share #7 Posted July 29, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Lets not confuse Noise Reduction with Noise Filtering, two very different things. Steve Maybe you're right, but then there is something strange in the Wikipedia article about noise reduction Noise reduction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Even a black frame added to an image has to be considered a filter, don't you agree? At the end it's only a question of definitions and I think we all agree that there are big differences between filtering algorithms to achieve noise reduction. Please let me know if I got something wrong. Andreas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted July 29, 2010 Share #8 Posted July 29, 2010 Also the hot pixels eliminated (in JPEG and DNG files) by subtracting a dark frame and interpolating the affected pixels are not your ordinary kind of noise and have quite different characteristics. Calling this noise suppression is a bit misleading but camera vendors do it anyway. “Hot pixel elimination” would be a better term. And note that this has to be performed in-camera as the dark frame only exists in-camera. The only alternative would amount to storing two images (the image and its dark frame) and to shift the burden of dark frame subtraction to the raw converter, with no obvious benefits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted July 29, 2010 Share #9 Posted July 29, 2010 Andreas, irrespective of what Wikipedia says, 'noise reduction' is used by camera manufacturers to mean 'hot pixel elimination' as mjh has pointed out. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nafpie Posted July 29, 2010 Share #10 Posted July 29, 2010 The only alternative would amount to storing two images (the image and its dark frame) and to shift the burden of dark frame subtraction to the raw converter, with no obvious benefits. One obvious benefit would be, that you may be able to use ONE darkframe for a number of images (same exposure time & outside temperature for all of course) -> no more waiting for the darkframe after EACH single exposure. Stefan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted July 29, 2010 Share #11 Posted July 29, 2010 I think I recall that Sandy told us here that there is now some in-built noise reduction at some higher ISOs (on the M9) even for DNG files. .That is slightly different to the system mentioned here for long exposures (which could actually be at a low ISO). Several people have noticed (Sean Reid, Sandy, myself, ...) that in the M9 there is weak noise filtering being applied at ALL higher ISOs (the M8 only seemed to do it at 1250 and higher). If you want to make very large prints, it would be nice to turn this off and use tools that are optimal for the intended output, not a general solution. This is a frequently requested item in threads about future firmware features.. scott Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Negative Posted July 29, 2010 Share #12 Posted July 29, 2010 ...This is a frequently requested item in threads about future firmware features.. And we all know how well that works out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted July 30, 2010 Share #13 Posted July 30, 2010 Several people have noticed (Sean Reid, Sandy, myself, ...) that in the M9 there is weak noise filtering being applied at ALL higher ISOs (the M8 only seemed to do it at 1250 and higher). If you want to make very large prints, it would be nice to turn this off and use tools that are optimal for the intended output, not a general solution. This is a frequently requested item in threads about future firmware features.. scott Although I would agree with the request, the word " frequently" is better replaced by " rarely" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.