Jump to content

Leica Hektor 7,3cm M39


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Ich habe ein Hektor 7,3cm 1:1,9 für meine IIIa gekauft. Jetzt habe ich probiert die Produktionszeiten zu vergleichen (soll ja wenn möglich passen). Leider hat dass Hektor eine Seriennummer 96xxx. Ich habe immer gedacht die Serieenummern gehen erst ab 100.000 los? Im Internet habe ich gesucht, leider nichts Gescheites gefunden. Hat Jemand einen Tipp? Danke im Voraus

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Dein Hektor mit einer Nummer 96.... dürfte von 1932 stammen und eines der ganz frühen Exemplare sein. Gut bewahren!

 

Wenn Du den zweiten Thread im diesem Unterforum aufrufst, findest Du einen Link zur Recherche mit Seriennummern.

 

P.S: Du hast im internationalen Teil des Forums gepostet; hier wird üblicherweise Englisch gesprochen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh sorry, I continue in English of course. Here there is the possibility to enter the serial number and to receive the production date. But even here there was no answer. So once again: Why do the official sites (incl. standard google search) talk about serial numbers for lenses beginning from 100'000 and this one is 96xxx? Do someone know a good internet side or has an answer for it? Best regards Rotwang

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for the bad picture quality ;-)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Leitz lenses' serial numbers began notoriously before 100.000, and Hektor 7,3 is one of the typical lenses which can (not often) be found with such numbers: Hektor 5 cm 2,5 and "Fat" Elmar 9 cm also exist numbered under 100.000 (but I never saw numbers below 94.000, I seem to remember).

I haven't ever read precise statements about this question of numbering... but I can make this hipotesis :

- First Leicas were fixed-lens - no reason to give a specific number to the lens in itself

- First Leicas with interchangable lens were the so called "non-standard mount" - lenses had to be matched for the specific body, and the lenses were engraved with the last 3 numbers of the body

- But, Leitz had built for years "non-Leica" lenses, sold for 3rd party plate cameras : surely they had a factory numbering... can be the the first lenses for the "Standard" Leica mount started from numbers which followed that numbering system.

 

Un-numbered standard lenses also exist... I have an Elmar 13,5 and a "Fat" Elmar 9 of this kind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Un-numbered standard lenses also exist... I have an Elmar 13,5 and a "Fat" Elmar 9 of this kind."

 

According to Laney: Leica Collectors Guide - lenses without visible engraved serial numbers often have a number scratched on the inside of the barrel somewhere.

 

Also (Ibid) lenses prior to the introduction of the standardized screw mount in 1931 were engraved with the same serial number (or the last 3 digits, as Luigi says) of the matched camera body - not an independent number. So lens numbers were still just a copy of camera numbers.

 

Presumably at some point in 1931-32, Leica realized they needed a separate numbering sequence for LTM lenses (and keep a record of them), and picked up where the last "dedicated-to-camera" lens numbers left off - somewhere between about 60,000 and 100,000.

 

The Hektor 7.3cm was introduced in 1931, and Leica was up to the 100,000 mark by 1933, which narrows the date window for this lens to (most likely) late 1931 or 1932. Which is about as close as one can get with any Leica numbering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

(P.S. : try SERIOUSLY to guess what I took at Westlicht auction... ;))

 

 

Not easy as first you collect not only Leitz/Leica items,

second they were few lenses and I do not think one was missing in your collection

so....!

181 had no bid

182 ?

 

 

93118.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not easy as first you collect not only Leitz/Leica items,

second they were few lenses and I do not think one was missing in your collection

so....!

181 had no bid

182 ?

 

 

 

You are a lot near... it's the "400 I miss"...and indeed I thought to 181...; but YOU ought to notice a CERTAIN item... ;);)... a bit outside of my bodies...

 

P.S. : fine the 93.118, in millimeters and 11 'o clock ! Normal RF coupling ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a lot near... it's the "400 I miss"...and indeed I thought to 181...; but YOU ought to notice a CERTAIN item... ;);)... a bit outside of my bodies...

 

P.S. : fine the 93.118, in millimeters and 11 'o clock ! Normal RF coupling ?

 

Dear Luigi,

Here are the "below 100.000" serials enciuntered in my Fontenelle Collection :

- 93133 Elmar 1:3,5 F=50mm nickel, 11 o'clock, mtr

- 93367 idem

- 93624 VAROB nickel

- 94086 Hektor f=5 cm 1:2,5 nickel, focus button cylindrical, 11 o'clock

- 96423 idem

- 96833 Elmar f=9cm 1:4, fat, black and nickel

- 99886 Elmar f=5cm 1:3,5 nickel mtr 7 o'clock

My first "above 100.000" was an Elmar f=10,5cm 1:6,3 black and nickel, feet #107222.

Pierre

Cordially

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can show you a Hektor lens from the same time with a N° 96 501 from my own collection. The glasses are very clean and the body has a nice patina.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...