Jump to content

Noctilux on M8 looks sharper than on M9


eleskin

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I had a chance to test the M9 with my late generation f1.0 Noctilux at the Photo Expo Plus in New York City last month and I get the impression the M8 produces sharper files with this lens than the M9. I showed prints enlarged to 22"x17" to a friend of mine who is also a photographer, and he believes this is true as well, in fact, comparing the two cameras was like comparing apples and oranges. Yes, I know many of the issues with the M8 were solved with the M9, but as a picture making machine, is the M9 really that far ahead of the M8? I think not. Posted here are some Noctilux pics to show what I mean. the first set was with the M9

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

x
  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

These are more M8 shots

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not going to comment on the photos, as they are manual focus cameras, and the DOF at f1 is ridiculosly shallow so the chance for user error is considerable, but I am quite sure the M9 has an AA filter, and the M8 doesn't, therefore the M8 files should appear sharper than the M9 without any PP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not going to comment on the photos, as they are manual focus cameras, and the DOF at f1 is ridiculosly shallow so the chance for user error is considerable, but I am quite sure the M9 has an AA filter, and the M8 doesn't, therefore the M8 files should appear sharper than the M9 without any PP.

 

Sorry but there is no AA filter in the M9, just an IR/UV filter.

 

Apart from that I support phatnev from my own experience with Nocti and M8. There will always be a certain amount of errors in focusing, so a substantial comparison of differences between M8 and M9 should consider:

  • tripod and self-timer
  • a static object
  • focus bracketing to be sure to focos spot on

Not a quick task at all.

 

Best

Holger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but there is no AA filter in the M9, just an IR/UV filter.

 

Apart from that I support phatnev from my own experience with Nocti and M8. There will always be a certain amount of errors in focusing, so a substantial comparison of differences between M8 and M9 should consider:

  • tripod and self-timer
  • a static object
  • focus bracketing to be sure to focos spot on

Not a quick task at all.

 

Best

Holger

 

My apologies. Its always much more fun to use the noct on any M9 body than compare sharpness :D I imagine the extra DOF might actually help with focusing on the M8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Well I can see the point in how the M9 and M8 have different depth of feild qualities. Here, the M8 may be a wonderful camera for Noctilux photography in that it gives much better focus accuracy while giving one that beautiful out of focus painterly background.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but as a picture making machine, is the M9 really that far ahead of the M8? I think not.

 

I agree, the M9 is not "that far ahead" but I'm not sure what you think your comparison shots prove. Still, if it makes you happy who am I to rain on your parade?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a couple of things to consider here reg M8 vs M9.

 

1) FF sensor has different DOF. We can see this easily by comparing any FF camera against any crop sensor cameras. FF equals shallow DOF (when comparing against same lense in crop sensor camera)

 

2) comparing sharpness in hand held photos is pure speculation always. ultimate sharpness cannot be achieved handheld

 

3) crop sensor cameras only use the center most portion of the lense. for most lenses that is definately the sweet spot thus easily giving the idea of a sharper camera/lense combination

 

4) if I'm not mistaken, the M8 has better lp/mm ratio which easily can give the impression of sharper pictures as there's more information available for a certain area.. thus if you crop the exact same area of picture from M9 and M8 picture, the M8 actually has better resolution.

 

So I agree with your oranges and apples comparison, but I'm not ready to give any verdicts on the sharpness. Someone should have M8 & M9 on a tripod shooting the exact same subject. Definately use a remote trigger for the shutter or self-timer. And to compare the same lense, one would need to move the M9 further behind to achieve the same FOV as the M8. That would also equalise pretty much the pixel count for the 100% crops as well.. And then make comparisons on sharpness.

 

So it's not an easy task to get scientific info on this matter. And I'm quite sure I just missed something critical from my "lab setup"...

 

The other thing is then the purely subjective evaluation or perception of sharpness.. some ppl will like the M9 and other will like the M8. Main thing is that hopefully many ppl will like Leicas :)

 

I have (should I say will have, when it gets back from Solms) the M8. I would have propably gone for M9 if I had the money.. And that decisions would have been purely made on the idea that with the M9 all the lenses will be what they were designed to be and also for the possibility of better ISO performance.

 

Just my 2c,

 

Juha

Link to post
Share on other sites

First picture I ever took with the new Noctilux 0.95 at a demo day.

M9 but lens setting for Summilux ASPH 50, wide open 1/40sec.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks indeed a bit soft compared to other FFs at slower apertures but 0.95 has no competition. Also, from raw files i've picked up on the web, i wonder if M9 pics don't need a bit of sharpening where M8's can do without. Just a guess though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest WPalank

I don't think it was stated in any of the posts above, if so, my apologies.

 

But, have you tried any other lenses wide open with the same M8/M9 combo?

 

There is the possibility that the M9 may need calibration whereas the M8 is spot on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be very surprising if the M8 were not sharper in this configuration. Especially the Noctilux has exponentially increasing aberrations out of the center. The M8 cuts of a large part of that. That was exactly the complaint about the 1.3 crop factor by users (KM25 springs to mind) that disliked that it took away the character of the lenses. The M9 by being FF has redressed that. Now repeat the test with for instance the Summilux 50 asph @ 4.0, or the ApoSummicron 90 asph @ 4.0. Then you will see a different outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here are the pics

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A crop of the pic

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...