Rona!d Posted November 21, 2009 Share #1 Posted November 21, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Just a snapshot at poor light and bad color-temperature (mixed light), but whitebalance, colors and focus are really good for "out of the box" Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/104412-x1-iso-1600-140sec-f-128/?do=findComment&comment=1124896'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 21, 2009 Posted November 21, 2009 Hi Rona!d, Take a look here X1 - ISO 1600, 1/40sec., f 1:2.8. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Tenor1 Posted November 21, 2009 Share #2 Posted November 21, 2009 Thank you for sharing this photo. Do you like the X1? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rona!d Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share #3 Posted November 21, 2009 Some could complain about the highlights, but it was no easy light and this issue would need further tests. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rona!d Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share #4 Posted November 21, 2009 Thank you for sharing this photo. Do you like the X1? Will need some further "real world" tests to say more, but it´s an interesting camera, lightweight, compact and big sensor. The user interface (buttons, menue etc.) is good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
holgerf Posted November 21, 2009 Share #5 Posted November 21, 2009 Just a snapshot at poor light and bad color-temperature (mixed light), but whitebalance, colors and focus are really good for "out of the box" [ATTACH]174489[/ATTACH] It’s a good example for what you can get with a big senser in terms of composition! Best Holger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted November 21, 2009 Share #6 Posted November 21, 2009 Just a snapshot at poor light and bad color-temperature (mixed light), but whitebalance, colors and focus are really good for "out of the box"... Do you mean it is a jpeg? If not, what raw converter did you use if i may ask? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rona!d Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share #7 Posted November 21, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Do you mean it is a jpeg? If not, what raw converter did you use if i may ask? No matter if JPEG or (non tuned-) DNG, both looked the same. For the DNG i use C1 Pro (V4). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted November 21, 2009 Share #8 Posted November 21, 2009 No matter if JPEG or DNG, both looked the same. For the DNG i use C1 Pro (V4). You mean exactly the same? First time i would see this but i will believe you since you are a moderator. I asked this because i use C1 v4 myself and i seemed to retrieve its 'look'. Does a great job in reducing noise with all my digicams. Very neat result anyway, thanks for sharing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted November 21, 2009 Share #9 Posted November 21, 2009 Given the mixed lighting sources, your picture is highly commendable and a very promising example of what the little X1 is capable. Thank you for sharing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglasco Posted November 21, 2009 Share #10 Posted November 21, 2009 No comments so far from the usual X1 critics Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted November 21, 2009 Share #11 Posted November 21, 2009 ronlad promising.....can't wait till mine arrives :-) have high hopes for the X1:D Andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rona!d Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share #12 Posted November 21, 2009 You mean exactly the same? First time i would see this but i will believe you since you are a moderator. I asked this because i use C1 v4 myself and i seemed to retrieve its 'look'. Does a great job in reducing noise with all my digicams. Very neat result anyway, thanks for sharing. No big difference for these web-pictures, so one could save the time for DNG-converting if he only wants (quick) web images. What i wanted to say, is that the AWB worked so well, that i didn´t need any WB-switching in the RAW-converter. Sure for highest quality one should always shoot RAW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted November 21, 2009 Share #13 Posted November 21, 2009 No big difference for these web-pictures, so one could save the time for DNG-converting if he only wants (quick) web images. What i wanted to say, is that the AWB worked so well, that i didn´t need any WB-switching in the RAW-converter. Sure for highest quality one should always shoot RAW. Main issue is digital noise at those high isos, Ronald. C1 v4 does a great job in reducing noise, much better than camera firmwares generally. Reason why i wanted to know if your pic above is a jpeg direct out of the camera or a jpeg direct out of... C1 v4. See what i mean? Just curious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted November 21, 2009 Share #14 Posted November 21, 2009 No comments so far from the usual X1 critics........only a few criticised the camera's IQ .........still there are the nikon D300/D90 style blown highlights presents, but that is the nature of that sensor at high isos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted November 21, 2009 Share #15 Posted November 21, 2009 Most C1 pics look fine gents, even my old Epson's @ 1600 iso. Larger file here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grober Posted November 23, 2009 Share #16 Posted November 23, 2009 Thank you, Ronald, for posting the X1 pix. This makes me even more eager to get my hands on mine . . . already have one ordered from an authorized Leica dealer. -g Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chkphoto Posted December 12, 2009 Share #17 Posted December 12, 2009 I'm not even interested in the X1 but I don't think you can complain about the highlights in the presented shot. They are near specular highlights. A lot of which are outside the plane of focus. You would need a polarizer to reduce the glare on the metallic top panel. The file also retained a good amount of detail in the fabric of the dark bag on the right. It's a pretty nice file for mixed glaring light. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.