surfside Posted May 21, 2011 Share #1 Posted May 21, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) these are the first shots from my m8.2. it is my first leica m (i wrote about my experience in the m8 forum here), and i haven't yet learned how to use capture one (or another post-processing software package), so these photos are pure, undefiled m8.2. all of the pics are taken with a 40mm summicron f2.0; i'm really pleased with the results. [ATTACH]258725[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]258726[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]258727[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]258728[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]258729[/ATTACH] and one more fun parting shot [ATTACH]258730[/ATTACH] any thoughts/criticisms/suggestions are encouraged -- i'd love to hear what you think. all the best, surfside Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 Hi surfside, Take a look here big smile. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
biswasg Posted May 21, 2011 Share #2 Posted May 21, 2011 Thanks for posting these images. As I am also contemplating buying the Summicron C 40/f2, would be interested to know the EXIF details (aperture, shutter and ISO). As some of the images appear a bit soft, wanted to know whether you used the rf focusing or zone focusing. From your post it seems you shot in jpg and not RAW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfside Posted May 21, 2011 Author Share #3 Posted May 21, 2011 Thanks for posting these images. As I am also contemplating buying the Summicron C 40/f2, would be interested to know the EXIF details (aperture, shutter and ISO). As some of the images appear a bit soft, wanted to know whether you used the rf focusing or zone focusing.From your post it seems you shot in jpg and not RAW. looking at iphoto, iso was 160 for each of these, and the shutter speed was either 1/360 or 1/500. and you're right -- i shot in jpg and not RAW. as for the focusing, i used the RF -- i haven't learned about zone focusing just yet. hope this helps, surfside Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpitt Posted May 21, 2011 Share #4 Posted May 21, 2011 Thanks for posting these photo's. I like the third one best. With a little cropping it will make a fine portret. For unprocessed jpgs they do not seem overly soft to me. Although it must be said that compared to the ASPH lenses these old summicrons always are a bit softer. To me that is not a bad thing. You can always adjust in PP. A pre-ASPH summicron 50 will probably be better but it will also cost a lot more than you paid for the 40. If you are beginning to learn PP. I sugguest you have a look at Aperture 3 if you work on a Mac. It is more intuitive to use than capture one and gives great results. Some will argue that capture one is better in the IQ department, and maybe they are right. But i feel that the differences in learning curve outweigh the differences in IQ. Looking forward to seeing more of your foto's! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spo Posted May 21, 2011 Share #5 Posted May 21, 2011 Nos 1 & 3 are the best for me, excellent subject:D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuny Posted May 22, 2011 Share #6 Posted May 22, 2011 Lovely subject. #3 would be stronger (and a superb image with a coupel of inches cropped from teh lefft or the right to move her out of the center. 4&5 are fun and charming. 6 doesn't work for me. These seem to be in the US. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezc203 Posted May 23, 2011 Share #7 Posted May 23, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) What an adorable lady. #4 is definitely my favorite, but a stellar series all together. Love it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
epand56 Posted May 23, 2011 Share #8 Posted May 23, 2011 Hello Surfside, first of all I'm happy for helping you in choosing this lens. This said I have a question: did you shoot these pics with a UV/IR filter on the lens? I'm asking this because I find a lack of contrast in these pics as well. I'm used to have more saturated colors and more contrasty images with my Cron 40. And even the focus is softer than this lens can deliver. As far as filters are concerned, I've red many different threads about the difficulty of mounting an E39 filter on the Cron 40, but i just screwed one between the lens and the hood without over tighten and screwed the hood on it and it's there since a couple years without giving any problem. Unless you're shooting for B&W, on the M8 the UV/IR filter and Lens recognition UV/IR-On are almost a must. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roguewave Posted May 23, 2011 Share #9 Posted May 23, 2011 Welcome Aboard. You have chosen a very fine kit. I love my Cron 40 & also have the Rokkor version of this lens. Both are very fine lenses & I love the small package of the 40 & the M8. As you are in CA, with lots of light, you might consider purchasing the Rokkor version, as it has advanced coatings which reduce unwanted flair. Also, do you have the screw on lens shade? That will be very useful in daylight. What I think you will really enjoy is shooting at dusk & in the evenings, with the aperture wide open. The bokeh of this lens rivals the Summicron 35 & older Summicron 50's, IMHO. Anyway, have fun & post often. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfside Posted May 23, 2011 Author Share #10 Posted May 23, 2011 Hello Surfside, first of all I'm happy for helping you in choosing this lens. This said I have a question: did you shoot these pics with a UV/IR filter on the lens?I'm asking this because I find a lack of contrast in these pics as well. I'm used to have more saturated colors and more contrasty images with my Cron 40. And even the focus is softer than this lens can deliver. As far as filters are concerned, I've red many different threads about the difficulty of mounting an E39 filter on the Cron 40, but i just screwed one between the lens and the hood without over tighten and screwed the hood on it and it's there since a couple years without giving any problem. Unless you're shooting for B&W, on the M8 the UV/IR filter and Lens recognition UV/IR-On are almost a must. thanks for your comments enrico. to answer your questions, yes i was shooting with an UV/IR filter on the lens, and i'm pretty sure the camera had "lens recognition UV/IR-On" (less certain about that last bit). as for your comments about more saturated colors and contrasty images, to be honest given i'm so new to the technical side of photography i'm not sure i really understand what you mean. is there something i am possibly doing wrong or something i can do differently to produce better results, or are you concerned that i got a "bad" or less capable lens? could it possibly be due to the fact that these are untouched jpegs (as opposed to RAW files manipulated with post-processing software)? and as for the images being less "focused" than this lens can deliver, i'm guessing that is do to "user error" -- i am brand spanking new to using a rangefinder camera, and am still learning how to properly focus. i really do welcome any suggestions or other comments from anyone that would like to help a noobie! all the best, surfside Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
animefx Posted September 29, 2011 Share #11 Posted September 29, 2011 The 3rd and 4th ones are my favorites. Nice work I have a 40mm rokkor-m with my M8 which is basically the same lens. I love mine. I would highly recommend shooting in RAW though so you can get even sharper photos... In my opinion the M8's in camera JPGs are a bit soft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmyjoe Posted September 29, 2011 Share #12 Posted September 29, 2011 Four and five are my favorites. I too have the M8.2 and dearly love it, though I haven't acquired a 40mm yet. All in due time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jc_braconi Posted September 29, 2011 Share #13 Posted September 29, 2011 #3 the most natural for me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergiofigliolia Posted October 5, 2011 Share #14 Posted October 5, 2011 it looks like it is sharp in the center and soft in the corners. I am interested in this lens for its size and price... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.