Jump to content

Favorite Color Print Film


wilfredo

Recommended Posts

Another vote for Reala from me. Natural (not oversaturated) colours for my taste, with very good flesh tones. (Those who prefer something like Agfa Ultra 100 may well find Reala a bit uninspiring though. No good or bad here though, all a matter of personal taste)

Link to post
Share on other sites

agfa optima was my fave..

 

but if i use negative color then it is either portra 160 both according to needs and i also love the fuji npz 800 very much (love it more than press 800). fuji pro npc/s 160 are good ones as well, slightly different look than the portra kodak but equaly good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to scan yourself, and not rely on someone else to scan for you, don't even think about Fuji 4-layer negative film.

 

The 4th layer is a nightmare, in my experience.

 

Kodak films are much better in this regard, although slide film is better still. With slide film, you have a true original as a reference, not a print made by someone else.

 

I have found that colour print films are generally much more difficult to work with. If you get it right, they're OK (Kodak ones), but get it wrong and the colours are all over the place. I'll never take another print film - I'll stick to Astia in future.

 

Just my 2 penneth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the AZ strong and contrasty lighting, I like the Kodak Portra 160 NC and Portra 400 VC.

 

Like William said, the 160 NC really works great for me. It provides great skin tones, just the right contrast in AZ, great color rendering, very fine grain, great DR, and reasonable saturation. If I want a little more saturation, I can always fix that in the post-processing of the scan. In AZ, I have tried the Fujis, the Kodak UC, and the 160 VC, but they are all too contrasty and block up.

 

For 400 speed, I found the 400 NC too flat and just don't like the Fuji offerings. The 400 VC added just the right amount of punch without being overwhelming as it was in the 160 speed.

 

Just my experience and preference in AZ.

 

Best,

 

Ray

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to scan yourself, and not rely on someone else to scan for you, don't even think about Fuji 4-layer negative film.

 

The 4th layer is a nightmare, in my experience.

 

Kodak films are much better in this regard, although slide film is better still. With slide film, you have a true original as a reference, not a print made by someone else.

 

I have found that colour print films are generally much more difficult to work with. If you get it right, they're OK (Kodak ones), but get it wrong and the colours are all over the place. I'll never take another print film - I'll stick to Astia in future.

 

Just my 2 penneth.

Could You describe this in a more details? Why is the 4th layer a nightmare for scanning? What is the best 100 ASA color negative film for scanning? Is Fujifilm 100 without the 4th layer better than Fujifilm Superia 100 or Superia Reala?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to scan yourself, and not rely on someone else to scan for you, don't even think about Fuji 4-layer negative film.

 

The 4th layer is a nightmare, in my experience.

 

Kodak films are much better in this regard, although slide film is better still. With slide film, you have a true original as a reference, not a print made by someone else.

 

I have found that colour print films are generally much more difficult to work with. If you get it right, they're OK (Kodak ones), but get it wrong and the colours are all over the place. I'll never take another print film - I'll stick to Astia in future.

 

Just my 2 penneth.

 

Andy,

 

I'm also interested in a little more detail regarding the 4th layer nightmare.

 

For the past two + years I've been scanning various Fuji print films (Reala, Superia, Press) on a Nikon Coolscan V with no issues at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

I've noted your comment on Fuji before and questioned my use of it. At £0.97 a 36 exp roll I've persisted and found it to produce satisfactory results.

 

I like the attached image on the Superia film.

 

However, I did go through a nightmare when the lab I use changed its scanner, but last 50 rolls have been satisfactory to me. No doubt Portra etc could be better, but at 3x the price I'm sticking with Fuji. :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, I'm also curious about the Fuji 4-level scanning problem.

 

What I'm looking for is an iso 200 or 400 C-41 color film that is commonly available in most shops in Europe and scans well. Any suggestions?

 

Mike

 

Portra 160 NC for bright scenes, Portra 160 VC for dull days, Portra 400 VC for lower light. All made for scanning with tougher negative bases than Fuji and very natural color and quite fine-grained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...