Jump to content

Noise with Leica DIgilux 3 - What to do?


Ida

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi everyone!

 

I own a Leica Digilux 3 and lately I have been noticing a noise even when shooting with only ISO 200, not to speak more ISO. I need the camera for work and with this amount of noise it's almost impossible to use it. Is this usual with this camera? I doubt that it was that bad when I bought it.

Thoughts, anyone? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don´t know the Digilux but other FT Cameras and think this is normal.

Noise is changing with different light situation and WB-Settings.

 

Use a tool like noise ninja or neat image and it will be gone...

Of course You must be careful because these tools are also able to cost You a lot of detail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi Ida,

 

I use the Dig 3 with kit lens which I guess you are doing. Obviously it is not possible for me to give you a definitive answer based on one image but:

 

The file looks immediately familiar noise wise, but I would not expect to see it show up so aggressively at ISO 200. This looks more like 800 or even 1600. You may also notice some banding of the noise from top to bottom and slightly slanted. If you really want to use the ISO function it helps a lot if you create a film 2 setting with maximum red suppression - and zero everything else off.

 

Personally I always stick with ISO 100 - mainly because of the banding. And I have just bought the Leica 25mm f1.4 for faster work.

 

Hope this helps

Johnny

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few tips to reduce noise: Make sure you don't underexpose your shots. Try bracketing or shooting in manual mode with an incident meter. Shoot in low-contrast mode. Set the white balance manually instead of automatic. Basically try to get the exposure/colors correct in camera rather that recover them in post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here you go:

Just a question. Your picture "example" has a format of 960 x 960 pixels. It is transported as jpg in 60 kb. In png it would take 830 kb.

Is the jpg-format (not loss free) the right choice for your problem?

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...