Jump to content

E-Clypse of Leica magnifier? x1.25 or x1.4


ptarmigan

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Looks like my long(ish) search for a 75mm APO cron is over :D

 

I'm a specs wearer and am thinking I will need a 1.25 or 1.4 eyepiece magnifier.

 

So my question, any benefits in going for the Leica one over the E-Clypse? And what about the 'eye cup', is it of benefit? What about the x1.25 vs x1.4 for use with a 75mm lens? I assume the latter is no good for a 50mm lens?

 

Especially like to hear from spec wearers using either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try the lens without a magnifier and see how it goes.

I have the 75 cron and the 90 Elmarit and don't find I need a magnifier to focus them correctly. But I have sent my M8 in a few times to have the RF adjusted, especially in the vertical direction, and I have done the wheel adjustment myself to get both of those lenses to focus spot on at close distances.

 

I do own the Leica x1.25 mag but never use it. It's just a pain putting it on and taking it off. Also I find I need a different diopter lens on the magnifier then I normally use on the camera without magnifier, +1 normally and a +1.5 with the magnifier, What the maginfiers really do is bring the view/rangefinder images closer to the eye. When that happens I need to increase the diopter lens strength just like I need to wear stronger reading glasses if I'm working on something close up (other then at reading distance).

Because of this to use the magnifier I first have to unscrew my normal diopter lens and stow it, then get the magnifier (which always has the +1.5 diopter screwed on) and screw that onto the camera then if I want to go back to wide angle I need to reverse the steps hoping I haven't lost or misplaced the normal diopter lens I use and that I don't have finger prints on the glass.

 

Like I said a pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 75 cron and the Leica 1.25 mag, and I wear glasses. I find that I don't need the mag, but occasionally will put it on to see even more clearly. The 1.4 would be overkill for me. (FWIW, I use the M8.2)

 

I once considered getting Tim's 1.25 mag with eyecup since the Leica rubber o-ring continually comes off and is tough on my glasses. Plus, the E-Clypse is far, far less expensive. I also liked that the E-Clypse comes in two diameters, since I would have opted for the smaller one.

 

In the end, however, I didn't get one since I just don't use the mag enough to justify getting another one. But, I did email Tim and spoke with 2 dealers here (in US) about the product, and all were willing to let me try it out and return it if it didn't work. I suggest you call your UK dealer (Robert White?) and see if you can try it out and see for yourself.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have only the 1.25 version, and keep it on one body, for the 75mm Summicron. I find that in good light, it really isn't necessary, but that in low light--clubs or at night on the street--and at intemediate distances [5-10M] it's very useful, and increases the proportion of "keepers." As for the O-ring, I took it off completely,since it wouldn't stay on, and used a narrow strip of black gaffer tape, bent over the lip, which keeps me from scratching my glasses. I can barely see the 50mm frame with my Rx, so I suspect the 1.4 might not work for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...