Jump to content

Leica R on Nikon D300 (Leitax again) - with pictures!


integrale

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Ok, I know this has been the topic on several threads previously, including andybartons's excellent post found here: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/92138-mounting-leitax-mounts.html, but having just finished converting 3 Elmarits to Nikon F mount with the Leitax solution I thought I would share my experience with you.

 

If you're fed up with hearing about this "Digital solution for the R lenses" then just move on...

 

When I stumpled upon some cheepish Elmarit lenses, I decided to try and have a go at the Leitax solution.

 

These are the convert candidates:

 

15p6a9g.jpg

 

Leitz Elmarit R 35mm, 90mm and 135mm all in very good condition. I paid app. USD 500 for the 35mm and the 135mm together with a Nikon 100E 2.8. The 90mm was slightly more expensive.

 

I especially like this view of the barrel-like 135mm:

 

2pzxima.jpg

 

I ordered 3 conversion kits from David Lladó and I recieved the following a few days later:

 

4kutrl.jpg

 

With trempling hands I started dismantling the lenses, starting with the 35mm; here, I'm halfway through the conversion of the 35mm:

 

drcxs3.jpg

 

Notice the tiny parts!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most dificult conversion was the 90mm where I had some trouble fitting the F-bayonet. This was entirely due to my mistake and not strictly following David's very instructive fitting instructions available on leitax.com!

 

Well, all is well that ends well and the conversion of all three lenses took about 40 minutes, so it really IS quite easy.

 

Here, the 90mm is fitted to my D300:

 

9rolt3.jpg

 

It looks and - more importantly - feels very balanced.

 

Here is the 35 mm (is it just me, or does the D300 look tiny in this shot?):

 

2my9s0x.jpg

 

The lenses work very well on the D300 in M (full manual with exposure iondication) or A (aperture priority) modes. Focus is indicated in the viewfinder and I can choose to link focus indicatio to any one of the 51 focuspoints.

 

Here are the first shots; my daughters and my dog filling in as models. Sorry about the noise, but I had to shoot on ISO3200.

 

135mm at 1/60 and f:1/2.8:

 

56zvm.jpg

 

90mm at 1/40 and f:1/2.8:

 

71pykx.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

And finally a shot from the beach the day after the conversion with the 35mm, here on f:1/5.6 and 1/1.600:

 

o74k0h.jpg

 

I think the 35mm surprised me the most; the sharpness of this final pictures is - to me at least - quite good, considering, i.a., that these are my first shots with manual focus; I have made a crop of the beach shot where the details on the fur are impressive (to me at least):

 

mvowaq.jpg

 

All in all I can highly recommend this solution; the R lenses are quite inexpensive and most af them can deliver very high IQ.

 

Next for me is a eye piece magnifier, and then a D700 - thanks for reading!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I traded the D300 up to a D700 and MY Gosh it's a great combo with the Leitz lenses.

 

My Elmarit 35mm is still doing absolutely great, but also the 90mm is superb on the D700. This is just a testshot during evening cooking and only mildly tweeked in PP (cropped and resized for web; D700, 1000 iso, f/2.8, s=1/80s):

 

xf4tw2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

R lenses work just fine in aperture priority mode on Nikons

 

Yes they do, but only on the more pro models. From the current lineup that's from D300 upwards. Even with the D90 you only have full manual. It's really a shame nikon has cripled the consumer models like this. For the models below D90 it actually gets worse, there you also lose the ability to use AF-D lenses. So they can only be shot in manual mode with old manual focus lenses and won't autofocus lenses without the AF-S system.

 

Enough dslr info for now :)

 

 

Just to make up for my "evil dslr info" I also handled M8.2 yesterday at a local digiexpo consumer trade show... Still amazing camera! They didn't have the M9 with them because it seems there's only 2 M9's shipped to Finland so far!!! They also said there are piles and piles of M9 orders in. It was their conclusion that S2 is getting delayed because Leica wants to put out as many M9's as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting these. I'm a recent convert to "R" lenses on a DSLR and looking forward to my next lens purchase, a 35mm Cron. My first and only R lens is a 90mm Elmarit and I love what I've captured thus far. Here are some repeat images. I've done post-processing on these but it helps when you have something worthwhile to begin with. I'm sold on R lenses. I don't miss the AF.

 

These were done with a Canon 5D II. Cayucos, California.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a shot taken with my Canon Digital Rebel T1i and the Elmarit. On the Rebel, bulk and size are reduced, which makes it a less intrusive DSLR.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I purchased the Leica R 35 on my Nikon D300. There are some photos making on nikkor 35 1.8 (first) and leica r 35 (the others) ....

Any ideas :eek:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I'm bumping this (very) old thread because it's exactly relevant to my situation.

 

Like Garic, I Leitaxed a Cron 35 (I) on my newly acquired D300. The 35 was said to perform quite badly on digital cameras, and I had seen examples of soft corners on the images - and at this point I suppose what I had seen were pics taken with the second version of the lens.

 

I thought the issue wouldn't be blatant on cropped sensors like mine, but boy, I was wrong!

So I did some tests shots with my 35, first version.

At f/2 it's almost comical, it behaves just like... a Thambar, ha ha, that's the first thought that popped up in my mind when I looked at the trial picture. Also, color fringing, and not by a small margin. It gets better by f/4.

 

Picture related, Cron 35 v1 @ f/2, crop from the middle-top of the frame

 

 

Today I've switched to Leitax mount to my Elmarit 28, a first version too.

The bad weather did not leave me much chance to make proper tests, but a quick series from f/2.8 to f/11 showed me that the lens' performance should be decent - especially compared to the Cron.

 

But I've noticed something: in this series of shots, I've noticed that the bigger the aperture, the darker the resulting image; i.e. a picture taken at f/2.8 will be noticeably darker than one taken at f/5.6. All shot in A mode (aperture priority), centre-weighted metering (metering performed on the same area, of course).

How is that :confused: Do you have any take on this?

 

Cheers

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...