jaapv Posted September 3, 2009 Share #61 Â Posted September 3, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) In that case it would be a lot simpler and cheaper to have an EVF camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Hi jaapv, Take a look here New Visoflex for M9. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest BigSplash Posted September 3, 2009 Share #62 Â Posted September 3, 2009 In that case it would be a lot simpler and cheaper to have an EVF camera. Â It is amasing 4 pages of threads in one day for a product that many say is not required and somehow bastardises the purity of a rangefinder "M" when the proposal is an accessory that enhances the units performance. Â I really wish that the nay sayers who have so much to contribute and have serious knowledge actually suggest ways of how to do the function rather than shooting the idea down. I hope that the messanger is not shot down either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigSplash Posted September 3, 2009 Share #63 Â Posted September 3, 2009 In that case it would be a lot simpler and cheaper to have an EVF camera. Â Jaapv can you be more specific? Â Are you sugesting a Lumix GF1 with appropriate adapters or a modified GF1 for use with an M or R lens. (ie two versions). Â If yes then what about sensor quality compared to a M8 and how would focussing be achieved? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ash Posted September 3, 2009 Share #64  Posted September 3, 2009 May be a new visoflex would more likely look like this: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/95249-new-visoflex-for-m9/?do=findComment&comment=1016083'>More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 3, 2009 Share #65 Â Posted September 3, 2009 A GF1 is not full frame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 3, 2009 Share #66 Â Posted September 3, 2009 May be a new visoflex would more likely look like this: Not without live-view Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manolo Posted September 3, 2009 Author Share #67 Â Posted September 3, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thank you to all that contribute to the thread. Â My hopes are to have a viewfinder-adapter that would turn an M9 into an R10 (I don't think there is a substitute for the mechanical optics to see through a lens and Leica is good at this). Â I'd have a ff native digital solution for my M & R lenses (and Leica would have a very elegant [to me] exit out of the R to concentrate on the M & S and in the future leave a reflex 35mm window) Â I plan to use more film for ff in my R9 & M5 and continue to use the M8 & DMR for digital without a hurry to make a change. Â MR10 2010 (with S2 tec)? Â Thank you again for the effort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mascarpone Posted September 14, 2009 Share #68 Â Posted September 14, 2009 Maybe it's a stupid question, but... does one of the old Visoflexes fit on an M9? Â Well, and if it does, metering could be difficult...? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpstjp Posted September 15, 2009 Share #69  Posted September 15, 2009 Maybe it's a stupid question, but... does one of the old Visoflexes fit on an M9? Well, and if it does, metering could be difficult...?  Yes. The M9 is the same size as the M8, hence the Visoflex III fits.  Yes. This has been debated before in the M8 forum.  dpstjp Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.