jmr Posted July 4, 2006 Share #1 Â Posted July 4, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) La Defense possesses some stunning modern architecture, if you like that sort of thing; happily, I do. Â [ATTACH]1291[/ATTACH] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 4, 2006 Posted July 4, 2006 Hi jmr, Take a look here La Grande Arche, Paris. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
cboudier Posted July 4, 2006 Share #2 Â Posted July 4, 2006 Please, tell me that you didn't use a Leica lens for this shot !?! (The Arche is NOT a barrel...) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted July 4, 2006 Author Share #3 Â Posted July 4, 2006 Sorry Christophe, I used a Digilux 4.3 for this shot in April 2002. Â It was prone to barrel distortion, not something I now tend to get with the Digilux 2 which is much truer. Â I must admit that I have perhaps made things worse by some less than perfect perspective correction in Photoshop Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael-IIIf Posted July 5, 2006 Share #4  Posted July 5, 2006 John,  The distortion on the D2 annoyed me so much I bought this plug-in for PhotoShop. It works very well and I've used it for other cameras too.  http://www.kekus.com/software/plugin.html  Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted July 5, 2006 Author Share #5 Â Posted July 5, 2006 Michael, Â thanks for the link, I've downloaded the trial version and played around with it on a couple of images; I agree, it looks good. I've let it loose on the image above - which offended some people's sensitivities. While not perfect, I can see the difference. Â [ATTACH]1447[/ATTACH] Â Thanks again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cboudier Posted July 5, 2006 Share #6 Â Posted July 5, 2006 ... which offended some people's sensitivities ... Â Far better now JR, and thank you for your effort Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted July 5, 2006 Author Share #7 Â Posted July 5, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Christophe, Â thanks, you were right about the original. It's funny how one's feelings for a photo, and the time and place it represents, can make one blind to its shortcomings. I guess that's the real value of good criticism, thanks again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlancasterd Posted July 6, 2006 Share #8  Posted July 6, 2006 John  I like this shot - especially in its corrected form - but don't go a bundle on the vertical pipes(?) and their associated stays under the arch - are they permanent, or just a temporary scaffolding of some kind? I've only seen this building from a distance, so haven't had the chance to examine it in detail.  The Digilux 4.3 was my first essay into digital photography too and it almost put me off for good! The ergonomics are apalling for someone brought up on 'normal' rangerfinder and SLR cameras, the battery life is minimal and the memory cards are unreliable - it's no wonder that Leica left Fuji for Panasonic after that model, IMHO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted July 6, 2006 Share #9 Â Posted July 6, 2006 Everything you see there (including the scaffold towers etc) is a permanent fixture. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuna Posted July 6, 2006 Share #10 Â Posted July 6, 2006 Impressive capture of an impressive structure. Oh,...and an impressive fix. Â Tuna Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm1912 Posted July 7, 2006 Share #11 Â Posted July 7, 2006 A fascinating construction. Thanks for posting this (and for the fix). Â Best, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share #12  Posted July 7, 2006 Thanks guys.  John, as Andy says the "scaffolding" is permanent. Actually its the lift (elevator) shaft which takes you to an art gallery and a rather good restaurant at the top of the arch.  Here's a snap looking almost straight upwards  [ATTACH]1582[/ATTACH]   and one of the lift itself  [ATTACH]1583[/ATTACH] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.