Jump to content

Help please engraving on Summar


Recommended Posts

Screw mount lenses :

Summitar 2/50, m, rounded iris, no engraving

Summitar 2/50, m, flat iris, 8 engraving

Summicron 2/50 collapsible,m, 7 engraving

Summicron 2/50 rigid,m, no engraving

Elmar 2.8/50 feet & m no engraving

Xenon 1.5/50 no engraving

Summarit & Summarit TTH 1.5/50 no engraving

Summaron 3.5/35 SM E36 & E39 no engraving

Summaron 5.6/28 no engraving

Super Angulon 4/21 no engraving

Link to post
Share on other sites

Summicron 2/50 rigid,m, no engraving

 

If it is the 7-element rigid Summicron, then it will have the engraving on the inner part of the lens head. Only visible once you unscrew the lens head. And it is not simply a number, as with the older lenses, but instead indicates the focal length precisely, usually "51,7" if I remember correctly.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is the 7-element rigid Summicron, then it will have the engraving on the inner part of the lens head. Only visible once you unscrew the lens head. And it is not simply a number, as with the older lenses, but instead indicates the focal length precisely, usually "51,7" if I remember correctly.

 

Andy

 

Yes, it is,

there are several writings :

51,9

26

134411

S

46135

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess was that it was the "vertical 8" for infinity, but i never happened to see the meaning of putting this sign below the lock. Both my Summar (No. 3244xx) and Summitar (No. 5232xx) have it, both have the meter-scale. On postwar 50-Elmars (bayonet) i can't find anything similar.

Mine is SN 280090, scale in meters, and the "B" or "8" symbol.;)

Dave G in NJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps some information I found in Rogliatti's book on the Leica lenses (2nd - german - Edition) gives a clue in our riddle - but certainly no resolution:

 

The book shows pictures of early 3.5/50-Elmars with different buttons for the infinity stops. The early types had a "0" on the focus ring next to the button. Rogliatti explains that the "0" marked the mounts for convertible lenses, as the earlier ones could only be used with the camera they were produced for.

 

May be our strange engravings below the the button had something to do with this; though i don't see the reason to put it on lenses like Summars or Summitars which were never produced non-convertible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Perhaps some information I found in Rogliatti's book on the Leica lenses (2nd - german - Edition) gives a clue in our riddle - but certainly no resolution:

 

The book shows pictures of early 3.5/50-Elmars with different buttons for the infinity stops. The early types had a "0" on the focus ring next to the button. Rogliatti explains that the "0" marked the mounts for convertible lenses, as the earlier ones could only be used with the camera they were produced for.

 

May be our strange engravings below the the button had something to do with this; though i don't see the reason to put it on lenses like Summars or Summitars which were never produced non-convertible.

 

This not a zero it is a O for universal (used on interchangeable lens) and it is stamped on the front ring of the lens.

you will find the same O on the front flange of the camera (at noon) with universal thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my Leica Equipment Catalogue from 1957 thereis this listing under auxiliary Mounts for the Focoslide.

What does this mean, I wonder?

JImL

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, and thank You for the hint.

In my Leica Equipment Catalogue from 1957 thereis this listing under auxiliary Mounts for the Focoslide.

Alright, a quick look into the "Leica Collector's Guide" (2nd edition) say : "Special helical focusing mount for older 50mm Elmar lenses of focal groups 1 to 3 (marked under infinity catch of lens) ...".

So i had a look at the Elmar 5cm f/3.5 page (226) and, look at this "4" on the picture.

And read the legend:

"Note also the figure "4" under the focusing lever: this was a Leitz code for the true focal length of the lens which would vary within a few mm either side of the nominal value."

 

We should read the books, from cover to cover. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Note also the figure "4" under the focusing lever: this was a Leitz code for the true focal length of the lens which would vary within a few mm either side of the nominal value."

We should read the books, from cover to cover. :)

 

You are absolutely right Phillip, do you find if this number has to be *.1 to be added to the nominal focal lenght to find the real value ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...