vic vic Posted October 4, 2006 Share #1 Posted October 4, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) mp 50 hp5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 Hi vic vic, Take a look here rakeli - photographer. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
stuny Posted October 4, 2006 Share #2 Posted October 4, 2006 Victor - I like the joy and energy in #2, and #3 is intriguing. The others don’t appeal to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fernando_b Posted October 5, 2006 Share #3 Posted October 5, 2006 What is the camera she is holding? Let me look well... BUT IT IS NOT A LEICA! Shame on her, Victor. Did you blame her? I like much her portrait in second image. Fernando. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uulrich Posted October 5, 2006 Share #4 Posted October 5, 2006 Hi Viktor; from all four I can only favour #2, #1, 3, 4 are not sharp and the highlights are blown, at #3 I even don't know what the boy on the right hand side has in his mouth. Does he eat something....? Also, she always holds the Nikon slightly rotated. I cannot imagine how HER results may look like. :-) You should ask her to join us! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share #5 Posted October 5, 2006 thanks alot for your coments...:-))) well - she is a a journalist and social photographer - she uses nikon digital rite now, but very attracted to the m8 idea... she told me that i should get the m8, keep on using my mp, and she will photograph with m8 :-))))) anyway - she is a very good photog :-))) anyway - the first two photos are done with the last lights ofg the day (it is evening)... the others in the darkness... uwe - try to photograph in alomst darkness while the flash comes from the camera :-))))))) u probably not gonna have details in highlights of the flash or light source :-))))))... ah - the face was eluminated with two or three candeles on the table :-)) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share #6 Posted October 5, 2006 thanks alot for your coments...:-))) well - she is a a journalist and social photographer - she uses nikon digital rite now, but very attracted to the m8 idea... she told me that i should get the m8, keep on using my mp, and she will photograph with m8 :-))))) anyway - she is a very good photog :-))) anyway - the first two photos are done with the last lights ofg the day (it is evening)... the others in the darkness... uwe - try to photograph in alomst darkness while the flash comes from the camera :-))))))) u probably not gonna have details in highlights of the flash or light source :-))))))... ah - the face was eluminated with two or three candeles on the table :-)) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackart Posted October 5, 2006 Share #7 Posted October 5, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) #2 is potentionaly good case, but whites are badly blown. You may want tu turn Your flash down 1 1/2 EV-s. -jaak Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share #8 Posted October 5, 2006 hi jack whats up..:-) man- where do u see the flash :-)) i dont even have flash (nor in camera - it is mp, non on camera flashes :-)))) it is dark in the garden and the face in that particular picture is eluminated by the light from the kitchen :-))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uulrich Posted October 5, 2006 Share #9 Posted October 5, 2006 No, that's clear to me.... There is only one flash. The flip-off from her D200 in #3 and that's the one from HER. HOwever, it's just a reflection and not the working flash! Viktor didn't use flash here, that's apparent to me, that is. Viktor... Again, ask her to join us! Get her the tools - just a click and credit card details away... :-) We deserve it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share #10 Posted October 5, 2006 d200 ? never remeber those names.. anyway - it was photographed more than year ago .. now she has some late model or whatever.. wait wait uwe... :-))) u want me to buy leica m8 for some one else even if it is good friend ??? :-)))))))) im not a milioner man :-))) not yet at least:-))) or maybe im just not ware how rich i am ??!!! :-)))))))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uulrich Posted October 5, 2006 Share #11 Posted October 5, 2006 d200 ? never remeber those names.. anyway - it was photographed more than year ago .. now she has some late model or whatever.. wait wait uwe... :-))) u want me to buy leica m8 for some one else even if it is good friend ??? :-)))))))) im not a milioner man :-))) not yet at least:-))) or maybe im just not ware how rich i am ??!!! :-)))))))) OK, OK... A D100 then, not aD200. Anyway, both are too slow. As fas as your second statement is concerned.... QUOTE: ":-)))))))) im not a milioner man :-))) not yet at least:-))) or maybe im just not ware how rich i am ??!!! " to tell you.. The difference between a decent income and having money is a good accountant. (mind from whom you heard this first!) :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share #12 Posted October 5, 2006 ha ha - deffenetly agree with u about income/money... gonna work on this part seriously :-)))))))))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gverdon Posted October 6, 2006 Share #13 Posted October 6, 2006 Victor, for me, #4 speaks louder... expressive, intense... Gérald Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted October 7, 2006 Author Share #14 Posted October 7, 2006 thanks gerald.. :-) ya - i love this photo too :-)))))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.