newpop Posted September 24, 2006 Share #1 Posted September 24, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) has anyone got there hands on this yet? I am 95% convinced that this is the camera for me, but would like some opinions, reviews. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 24, 2006 Posted September 24, 2006 Hi newpop, Take a look here any D-lux 3 users?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
marknorton Posted September 24, 2006 Share #2 Posted September 24, 2006 Interesting how many people on this forum don't know the difference between "there" and "their". I doubt their are any D-Lux 3s out their yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted September 24, 2006 Share #3 Posted September 24, 2006 I'm waiting to get one... black paint look so absolutely smashing! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted September 24, 2006 Share #4 Posted September 24, 2006 Read the impressions of the DLux2. Same horse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted September 24, 2006 Share #5 Posted September 24, 2006 Also, if it was that great Albert would already have the Panasonic LX2, which has been out long enough to be on ebay for yonks. Where are all the user raves about this one then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted September 24, 2006 Share #6 Posted September 24, 2006 2004 von Rob they could be a pair of geldings!!?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
789456 Posted September 24, 2006 Share #7 Posted September 24, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm waiting to get one... black paint look so absolutely smashing! +1 waiting... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Mitchum Posted September 24, 2006 Share #8 Posted September 24, 2006 Interesting how many people on this forum don't know the difference between "there" and "their". I doubt their are any D-Lux 3s out their yet. You mean "I doubt there are any D-Lux 3s out there yet" right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newpop Posted September 24, 2006 Author Share #9 Posted September 24, 2006 all apologies for the grammatical error Mark, I just wanted to know about the camera, didn't know I'd get a repremand on my english usage as well. Maybe I should visit a Roget's thesaurus forum instead?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newpop Posted September 24, 2006 Author Share #10 Posted September 24, 2006 reprimand, sorry again Mark... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted September 24, 2006 Share #11 Posted September 24, 2006 Not a reprimand, just a gentle reminder. The same would be due to people who think the singular of "lenses" is "lense" or that "it's" means "belonging to it" where actually it means "it is". And of course it's "I doubt there are any D-Lux 3s out there yet". Imagine what I am like to work for... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterb Posted September 24, 2006 Share #12 Posted September 24, 2006 Mark, to quote you from an earlier posting on another thread, "Get a life." Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted September 24, 2006 Share #13 Posted September 24, 2006 Hear, hear, Mark! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidE Posted September 24, 2006 Share #14 Posted September 24, 2006 Unable to afford the DLux3 or wait so bought the LX2 last weekend. Decided to buy DLUX 3 equivalent after reading Sean Reids review of the DLux2 (Thanks, Sean !) First impressions:- Beautifully made camera Very discreet Excellent 16:9 ration screen After using an SLR for a few years I am amazed at compact pocketable design, ergonomics and ease of use. Excellent image quality (but see below) The photograph was taken last weekend at about 7.00 a.m GMT from a hill top called Gummers How about 5 miles south of Windermere, Cumbria,U.K. ( incidentally Lake Windermere is situated to the left in the photograph under the mist ! ) I hope to improve when I get used to the camera and start using RAW when new Mac arrives in 2007 ( present system is an extremely slow iMac G 3) Many thanks to all contributors for their posts which I really enjoyed reading over the past 9 months while waiting for the launch of the LX2. Regards David Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/5869-any-d-lux-3-users/?do=findComment&comment=57503'>More sharing options...
peterb Posted September 25, 2006 Share #15 Posted September 25, 2006 From a current LX1 user, WOW! (ISO 100?) Thanks for posting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggabo Posted September 25, 2006 Share #16 Posted September 25, 2006 Not a reprimand, just a gentle reminder. The same would be due to people who think the singular of "lenses" is "lense" or that "it's" means "belonging to it" where actually it means "it is". And of course it's "I doubt there are any D-Lux 3s out there yet". Imagine what I am like to work for... You still understood his inquiry, did you not? It is poor form to be criticizing a person's english on an international forum, where it is likely that english is the person's second language. While you're at it, move your periods inside the quotation marks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newpop Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share #17 Posted September 25, 2006 Mark, I'm just a dumb fireman, so I'm glad I don't work for you. It would be fun to have you around the station correcting people's grammar, I'm sure you'd be quite the popular one! Everyone else, thanks for the replies, and that photo is very nice David, I have to admit that I'm also tempted to go with the Lx-2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drtrm Posted September 25, 2006 Share #18 Posted September 25, 2006 Mark, to quote you from an earlier posting on another thread, "Get a life." Peter Hi, Peter: Please explain, why can one "Have a Life" only with poor English? Tom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted September 25, 2006 Share #19 Posted September 25, 2006 From an LX1 user, I am not sure why the 'wow' but admit I am on a laptop. I am not sure why you would not be using RAW mode, surely you can access it with your current machine? It really does make a difference. It isn't worth waiting to get into it. Peter I thought everyone knew about EXIF info? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/5869-any-d-lux-3-users/?do=findComment&comment=57550'>More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted September 25, 2006 Share #20 Posted September 25, 2006 Hey Rob the Fireman, once you get the camera we can send in both the gramatic and liguistic genii and you can film the action in the station for us in LX2 / DLux3 movie mode. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.