Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Advertisement (gone after registration)

13 minutes ago, pedaes said:

We need to know if this guy is for real - buys a RAW only camera with no way of post processing. Do people do that, and then fuss about the 'look'? Not sure!

I can edit the RAW DNG files on my Mac desk top.  Very lucky for me that they were both made in 2016…!

Edited by Anthony MD
Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, pedaes said:

We need to know if this guy is for real - buys a RAW only camera with no way of post processing. Do people do that, and then fuss about the 'look'? Not sure!

You can edit RAW DNG files…!

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Anthony MD said:

I can edit the RAW DNG files on my Mac desk top.

jeez! You indicated you could not. Learn to do it properly then and good luck and good bye!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, pedaes said:

Apologies, I had forgotten that. Unprocessed RAW is worse than j-peg in appearance. You really need to take stock as a RAW only camera does not fit with an unprocessed workflow. Or are just messing us about?

Correction:

The Leica M-D 262 shoots compressed loss-less DNG…!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Anthony MD
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, pedaes said:

jeez! You indicated you could not. Learn to do it properly then and good luck and good bye!

This is what I use in post processing.  It’s what’s built in my desk top.

I said I could not download Capture One or Light Room…🥸

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Lord!  Any hacker could walk into that computer blindfolded! And now you put things like serial number and configuration on the Internet. I hope you don’t do private and banking stuff on it. 
I’ll delete that attachment. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, jaapv said:

Good Lord!  Any hacker could walk into that computer blindfolded! And now you put things like serial number and configuration on the Internet. I hope you don’t do private and banking stuff on it. 
I’ll delete that attachment. 

Not connected with any financial accounts, but thanks for your concern…!

Edited by Anthony MD
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Anthony MD said:

Correction:

The Leica M-D 262 shoots compressed loss-less DNG…!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

The point you seem to be missing is that a .dng file is an un-rendered image, it is the raw image data, not complied into a pleasing image through Leica firmware as a JPEG, and in need of user editing or software editing to do simple things like correct brightness, contrast, colour, etc. This is the back end of being a photographer, knowing these things, knowing when something isn’t right, and knowing when a raw .dng file needs editing to be transformed like a butterfly emerging from a chrysalis.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said:

Nobody prints images from film these days, do they? They just leave them as the negative - it's more natural and encourages the photographer to develop their skills.

I have always dreamed of shooting 10x8, so I can have decent sized pics and the crispness of contact prints. That's the closest I've got ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Dazzajl said:

I have always dreamed of shooting 10x8, so I can have decent sized pics and the crispness of contact prints. That's the closest I've got ;)

That's my ambition as well!

I like the cheapskate approach: print an image in negative monochrome onto A4 acetate transparency (you can buy it for inkjet) and then make cyanotypes.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Peter Karbe explains the Leica Look is how the designers make the lens by controlling the wave lengths of light not to distort…👀

Edited by Anthony MD
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anthony MD said:

Peter Karbe explains the Leica Look is how the designers make the lens by controlling the wave lengths of light not to distort…👀

So do you think all the other lens manufacturers do it an entirely different way and don’t understand? So other manufacturers missed this in the decades of lens development between all of them? Given you couldn’t tell the difference between a 50mm Voigtlander and a 50mm Leica from a photograph why do you insist on this BS?

Edited by 250swb
Changed it because it’s questionable if BS is a question or an accusation.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that’s time spent reading 14 pages of nonsense I won’t get back (even without reading the OP’s posts - but I get the drift).  Leica look - can I have what you’re smoking?

There’s a lot of myth and marketing hype in this forum about Leica this and Leica that which, to my mind, obstructs what they do really well.  When I bought my first Leica, I had forgotten about the rangefinder and I really didn’t know much about the lenses.  It was the straightforward presentation of a well made camera with direct, physical controls of what matters and the reasonably well hidden electronic parts which attracted me; manual focus, aperture ring and shutter dial all nicely packaged.  When I bought my M9, I had no idea about the lenses and simply accepted the recommendation from Meister Berlin to buy the 35 Summicron ASPH.  I just assumed that everything else would be up to standard, and I was right.

To be honest, I thought my Nikon lenses were as good for what they did.  I expected the Leica lens to be good, and I liked the camera.  In truth, I think a top of the range lens from any of the top makers is as good as any other in practice.  None of them are “bad lenses”.

I do applaud Leica for the fact that we can use almost 100 years of lenses on the latest M camera, and each has character.  But a consistent “Leica Look”?  Stuff and nonsense.  Leica glow does exist, along with so many other aberrations, but that is another topic, along with veiling flare, coma, focus shift, soft corners and barrel and moustache distortion.

Keep smoking!

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, IkarusJohn said:

Well, that’s time spent reading 14 pages of nonsense I won’t get back (even without reading the OP’s posts - but I get the drift).  Leica look - can I have what you’re smoking?

There’s a lot of myth and marketing hype in this forum about Leica this and Leica that which, to my mind, obstructs what they do really well.  When I bought my first Leica, I had forgotten about the rangefinder and I really didn’t know much about the lenses.  It was the straightforward presentation of a well made camera with direct, physical controls of what matters and the reasonably well hidden electronic parts which attracted me; manual focus, aperture ring and shutter dial all nicely packaged.  When I bought my M9, I had no idea about the lenses and simply accepted the recommendation from Meister Berlin to buy the 35 Summicron ASPH.  I just assumed that everything else would be up to standard, and I was right.

To be honest, I thought my Nikon lenses were as good for what they did.  I expected the Leica lens to be good, and I liked the camera.  In truth, I think a top of the range lens from any of the top makers is as good as any other in practice.  None of them are “bad lenses”.

I do applaud Leica for the fact that we can use almost 100 years of lenses on the latest M camera, and each has character.  But a consistent “Leica Look”?  Stuff and nonsense.  Leica glow does exist, along with so many other aberrations, but that is another topic, along with veiling flare, coma, focus shift, soft corners and barrel and moustache distortion.

Keep smoking!


What are you smoking It was a video…😁

Edited by Anthony MD
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Anthony MD said:

Peter Karbe explains the Leica Look is how the designers make the lens by controlling the wave lengths of light not to distort…👀

Sounds like King Canute to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...