Jump to content

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Steve Ash said:

No issue at all, go for this far better solution:

 

https://www.filmomat.eu/autocarrier

Not particularly useful for medium or large format scanning though. 

While the Epson V700 etc isn't great for scanning 35mm it does mean photographers don't need specialist bits of kit for every different film format they want to try. Also after the negs are loaded there is no touching and feeding and focusing to do, just use the software to get a digital contact sheet or do four or five high resolution scans. I imagine there will be a lot of medium and large format photographers buying up the last stocks because it's quite good with larger negs. If mine gives up the ghost I'll miss it a lot, even though I do all my high res scans with a camera nowadays.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a V500 which I haven't used for photos in years, though I used it to scan all my old family prints which had no negatives or which were in better condition than the negative. For negatives now I use a camera. I still use it for document/invoice/receipt scanning (I'm treasurer for a couple of small organisations), but it takes up a lot of space. I wonder if I could get away with one of those scanners the size of a rolling pin that you just feed a sheet through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've got a V850 that mostly scans invoices these days, or the odd print. Much quicker and easier to scan with a digital camera (D850 in my case). Even with a 35mm format camera, one can get very good results with a 120 (square typically in my case) negative or slide, and with AI software easily up-res etc. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with flatbed negative scanners is that they were never very good. Specifications tell you that the best Epson scanner can do 6400 dpi, but the resolution you see in your file is nowhere near that. In other words, you can get sharper results with a 24 megapixel camera, a macro lens, and a light-source/neg-holder like the one linked above (other brands are available).

Flatbeds are fairly decent for large format film, but that's too small a market for a company like Epson. I'm using an Agfa scanner from the mid-1990s for that, so it's not the type of equipment that they can re-sell every four or five years like a printer.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had several flatbed scanners, the first one probably back around 1990 but never used any of them for scanning my thousands of negatives and diapositives as results where too low quality.
Now i have two printers - a Brother 2730DW B/W Laser and a Epson ET-7750 Photo InkJet and both have a scanner included and i use the Brother scanner frequently for business purposes.

It is on my to-do list to scan some of my photos on film, but the lack of a with good quality scanner let me postpone it and i may do some tries with my SL2 and the 105mm macro i have.

Chris

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...