Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is my plan for a future v2 lux. Then I would use my SR round hood from the reissue and use a 43mm>46mm adapter and mount it on the v2. Just like how I have it mounted on my current VM.
 

A “poor man’s” steel rim

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 69xchange said:

This is my plan for a future v2 lux. Then I would use my SR round hood from the reissue and use a 43mm>46mm adapter and mount it on the v2. Just like how I have it mounted on my current VM.
 

A “poor man’s” steel rim

 

I believe I'm correct in saying that your 35 Nokton is the v1 (in Siver-Chrome to boot. V-Nice!)? Can you confirm that you don't suffer from edge cut-off from having the hood mounted so far forward with your system?

Philip.

Edited by pippy
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, pippy said:

I believe I'm correct in saying that your 35 Nokton is the v1 (in Siver-Chrome to boot. V-Nice!)? Can you confirm that you don't suffer from edge cut-off from having the hood mounted so far forward with your system?

Philip.

Hi Philip, 

Correct, this is the V1 MAP edition Nokton Classic 35mm 1.4.
 

With the updated Leica 12486 hood, step-up ring + b+w filter (Xs-pro/masters), I can confirm that there is absolutely no vignetting when tested on a full frame (M9).
 

However with this fake silver 43mm Leica filter from AliExpress (very thick), there is only a tiny bit of vignetting (but way less than the original/initial 12486 hood on the SR). A 2% border crop in post would get rid of the vignetting when shot at f8 with this set up.
 

I also tested an aftermarket 43mm round ventilated hood and had no issues with vignetting. However, it didn’t look aesthetically pleasing vs the Leica 12486 hood, step up ring + the fake Leica 43mm silver filter.  Photo comparison of hoods below..
 

Leica 12486 hood + step up ring

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

aftermarket 43mm hood:

Edited by 69xchange
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 69xchange said:

Correct, this is the V1 MAP edition Nokton Classic 35mm 1.4.

Not sure I understand... Why not just use an original CV hood? The MAP Camera version comes with a unique 'coarse' finish hood, which is impossible to replace should it be damaged. However, the hood for the standard version is fully compatible. FWIW, I have left the original one in the box and use the standard one. No vignetting with either hood and a B+W Master 43mm UV filter.

Also, I'm not familiar with the SR reissue. How would its hood (or the fake ring) attach to a Summilux 35/1.4 v2?

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ecar said:

Not sure I understand... Why not just use an original CV hood? The MAP Camera version comes with a unique 'coarse' finish hood, which is impossible to replace should it be damaged. However, the hood for the standard version is fully compatible. FWIW, I have left the original one in the box and use the standard one. No vignetting with either hood and a B+W Master 43mm UV filter.

Also, I'm not familiar with the SR reissue. How would its hood (or the fake ring) attach to a Summilux 35/1.4 v2?

My copy was second hand and never came with the limited edition textured hood. Plus, I already have the 12486 hood from my steel rim reissue and didn’t want to purchase the standard LH-6 hood for my MAP edition.

So to attach the 12486 (SR reissue round) hood onto a summilux v2 pre asph, I would have to do the ring mod for it to accept 43mm filters (exactly like what OP did) and then use the step up ring like how I attached the 12486 hood onto my MAP edition and transfer the whole thing onto the v2 pre asph.


I also use this 12486 hood on my 35mm summilux asph pre-fle as well. So this hood is currently interchangeable between 3 of my lenses. 
 

 

Edited by 69xchange
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

1 minute ago, 69xchange said:

My copy was second hand and never came with the limited edition textured hood. Plus, I already have the 12486 hood from my steel rim reissue and didn’t want to purchase the standard LH-6 hood for my MAP edition.

So to attach the 12486 (SR reissue round) hood onto a summilux v2 pre asph, I would have to do the ring mod for it to accept 43mm filters (exactly like what OP did) and then use the step up ring like how I attached the 12486 hood onto my MAP edition and transfer the whole thing onto the v2 pre asph. 

Thanks. It's clearer now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 69xchange said:

Hi Philip......Correct, this is the V1 MAP edition Nokton Classic 35mm 1.4....

Apologies! I had typed quite a long-winded reply well over an hour ago yet for some reason the upload failed (almost certainly my fault somewhere) but, in any event, the exchange which took place subsequently between yourself and Ecar covers many of the points I was going to be raising.

On which point...

Not being familiar with the (very pretty) Limited-Edition MAP version of the Nokton 35 f1.4 I had a google and loved this description;

"On the 25th anniversary of Map Camera, with a limited edition of “NOKTON Classic 35mm F1.4 MC VM” (and) with the cooperation of Cosina Co., Ltd. A limited lens hood that is made of dust and candy is included in the limited body of silver chrome pear, which is not a regular product...."...

Dust, Candy and Pear? How Very Sweet!......😸......

Just FWIW; if I were you, 69xchange, I would seriously reconsider acquiring an LH-6. It is one of the finest hoods - in every respect - that I have ever come across and, aesthetically, will look just a little bit 'More Classic / Classy' (IMO) that the set-up you are using at present as well as considerably shortening overall depth.

Originally I used a generic 43mm vented reverse-conical hood screwed onto a 43mm filter with the 40 Nokton but - although it is just a lenshood - buying the LH-6 was one of the best accessory-purchase decisions I have ever taken.

Philip.

Edited by pippy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pippy said:

Apologies! I had typed quite a long-winded reply well over an hour ago yet for some reason the upload failed (almost certainly my fault somewhere) but, in any event, the exchange which took place subsequently between yourself and Ecar covers many of the points I was going to be raising.

On which point...

Not being familiar with the (very pretty) Limited-Edition MAP version of the Nokton 35 f1.4 I had a google and loved this description;

"On the 25th anniversary of Map Camera, with a limited edition of “NOKTON Classic 35mm F1.4 MC VM” (and) with the cooperation of Cosina Co., Ltd. A limited lens hood that is made of dust and candy is included in the limited body of silver chrome pear, which is not a regular product...."...

Dust, Candy and Pear? How Very Sweet!......😸......

Just FWIW; if I were you, 69xchange, I would seriously reconsider acquiring an LH-6. It is one of the finest hoods - in every respect - that I have ever come across and, aesthetically, will look just a little bit 'More Classic / Classy' (IMO) that the set-up you are using at present as well as considerably shortening overall depth.

Originally I used a generic 43mm vented reverse-conical hood screwed onto a 43mm filter with the 40 Nokton but - although it is just a lenshood - buying the LH-6 was one of the best accessory-purchase decisions I have ever taken.

Philip.

Thanks for the advice Philip! I’ll look into the standard voigtlander LH-6 hoods. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 69xchange said:

Thanks for the advice Philip! I’ll look into the standard voigtlander LH-6 hoods. 

Happy if it might help.

If it might be of use I will try to take comparison snaps showing my original '43mm filter / 43mm screw-in-hood' system on the 40mm with one showing the LH-6 on the lens.

Philip.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pippy said:

Happy if it might help.

If it might be of use I will try to take comparison snaps showing my original '43mm filter / 43mm screw-in-hood' system on the 40mm with one showing the LH-6 on the lens.

Philip.

That’ll be great. Also you gave me an idea of trying to replicate the limited LH-6 hood. I wonder if I can respray the standard LH-6 hood using some grey/black wrinkle engine paint to mimic the texture of the MAP edition.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 69xchange said:

This is my plan for a future v2 lux. Then I would use my SR round hood from the reissue and use a 43mm>46mm adapter and mount it on the v2. Just like how I have it mounted on my current VM.
 

A “poor man’s” steel rim

Looks closer to the original steel rim (& prettier) than the SR remake :p 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go. Hope it helps.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, Ecar!

Not much to add but just by way of a comparison here is a hastily rattled-off comp. which shows a 43 generic screw-in (+ filter) and the LH-6. As the LH-6 hood bayonet-fits on to the lens rather than the front-edge of a filter it sits considerably lower than the other type;

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Philip.

Edited by pippy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For the CV Nokton I now prefer the Haoge LH-ZV02P Lens Hood. It mounts on the ZM/VM hood bayonet:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

7 hours ago, pippy said:

Thanks for that, Ecar!

Not much to add but just by way of a comparison here is a hastily rattled-off comp. which shows a 43 generic screw-in (+ filter) and the LH-6. As the LH-6 hood bayonet-fits on to the lens rather than the front-edge of a filter it sits considerably lower than the other type;

Philip.

 

9 hours ago, Ecar said:

Here you go. Hope it helps.

 

 

Thank you guys for the photos. No doubt that the LH-6 hood looks nice on the VM, but the limited edition hood is very beautiful. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 69xchange said:

...No doubt that the LH-6 hood looks nice on the VM, but the limited edition hood is very beautiful...

It is!

My own opinion is that it's such a pity when special edition sets are split-up such as with 69xchange's MAP Crackle-Finish LH-6 style from the lens. Similar story when the 35mm 'Steelilux' is separated from the M Edition 60.

Philip.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2024 at 1:38 AM, pippy said:

Thanks for that, Ecar!

Not much to add but just by way of a comparison here is a hastily rattled-off comp. which shows a 43 generic screw-in (+ filter) and the LH-6. As the LH-6 hood bayonet-fits on to the lens rather than the front-edge of a filter it sits considerably lower than the other type;

Philip.

Picked up a LH-6 hood and tried to spray it with a hammered finish. A bit disappointed because the paint wasn’t as textured as I hope and it’s too glossy. It was advertised as matte too. Anyways here’s the finish product.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...